From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:06:21 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44588dbd-8940-4fad-8ea3-407ac182515b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917125445.1376493-9-cassel@kernel.org>
On 2026/09/17 19:54, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> A command transfers the number of logical blocks that it asks for,
> bounded by the data buffer that the initiator provided. When the buffer
> is larger than that, the bytes beyond are not transferred, and the
> difference is a residual that the initiator is entitled to be told
> about.
>
> resp_read_dt0() reports it, as does resp_write_tape(), but the write
> paths for a disk do not: scsi_get_resid() keeps the zero that
> scsi_debug_queuecommand() initialised it with, so a write with an
> oversized buffer completes with GOOD status and a residual of zero, as
> though the whole buffer had been consumed. A READ of the same length
> into the same buffer reports the residual correctly, so the two
> directions disagree.
>
> Report it in resp_write_dt0(), resp_write_scat() and
> resp_atomic_write().
>
> resp_write_scat() needs a different expression from the other two. Its
> data-out buffer holds the parameter list header and the LBA range
> descriptors as well as the data, and sg_off walks over all of it, from
> the offset at which the data begins to the end of the last range that
> was written, so what the command consumed is sg_off and not the number
> of bytes that the last range transferred.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Yes. That goes with my comment about partial writes on v2.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 14:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44588dbd-8940-4fad-8ea3-407ac182515b@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox