From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:47:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqvvcEUo1u_6BqJS@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72659c27-3742-4760-8a5f-46d65ccf4012@kernel.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:11:39PM +0700, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > @@ -4290,6 +4290,19 @@ static int do_device_access(struct sdeb_store_info *sip, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> >
> > fsp = sip->storep;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * A data-out buffer that does not hold all of the data that the
> > + * command asks for is written up to the last whole physical block
> > + * that it does hold, so that a partial physical block is never
> > + * written. The bytes that are left over are reported as a residual.
> > + */
> > + if (do_write) {
> > + u32 avail = (sdb->length - sg_skip) / sdebug_sector_size;
> > +
> > + if (avail < num)
> > + num = round_down(avail, 1U << sdebug_physblk_exp);
>
> Nope, that is not correct. physical sector unaligned writes are OK with regular
> disks. They are not for ZBC, but we should check that in
> check_zbc_access_params() I think.
Patch [4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zonedwrites
does add a check for SWR zones, and for SWR zone only, which errors out if
the write is not aligned to the physical block size.
However, in the case of a short data-out buffer, the request is valid, so I
don't think that check_zbc_access_params() is the right place for the above
check.
But you are right that the check in do_device_access() should be gated on
SWR zones as well...
Something like this:
@@ -4263,6 +4273,8 @@ static int do_device_access(struct sdeb_store_info *sip, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
u64 block;
enum dma_data_direction dir;
struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb = &scp->sdb;
+ struct scsi_device *sdp = scp->device;
+ struct sdebug_dev_info *devip = (struct sdebug_dev_info *)sdp->hostdata;
u8 *fsp;
int i, total = 0;
@@ -4290,6 +4302,23 @@ static int do_device_access(struct sdeb_store_info *sip, struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
fsp = sip->storep;
+ /*
+ * For SWR zones, a data-out buffer that does not hold all of the data
+ * that the command asks for is written up to the last whole physical
+ * block that it does hold, so that a partial physical block is never
+ * written. The bytes that are left over are reported as a residual.
+ */
+ if (do_write && sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip)) {
+ struct sdeb_zone_state *zsp = zbc_zone(devip, lba);
+
+ if (zsp->z_type == ZBC_ZTYPE_SWR) {
+ u32 avail = (sdb->length - sg_skip) / sdebug_sector_size;
+
+ if (avail < num)
+ num = round_down(avail, 1U << sdebug_physblk_exp);
+ }
+ }
+
block = do_div(lba, sdebug_store_sectors);
/* Only allow 1x atomic write or multiple non-atomic writes at any given time */
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 14:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqvvcEUo1u_6BqJS@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox