Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 13:12:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917131251.445AC1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917125445.1376493-13-cassel@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] scsi_debug: ABBA deadlock between resp_atomic_write() and resp_comp_write()
- [Medium] scsi_debug: TOCTOU race in resp_atomic_write() via double evaluation
--

commit d00845f77d0b11824b6bd723b3a99d9e2026b838
Author: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>

scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16)

When logical block provisioning is enabled, commands that write user data mark
the region in the provisioning map. WRITE ATOMIC (16) leaves the map untouched,
so this patch calls map_region() and takes the metadata write lock across the
access.

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index 64f32d97455d6..33f2df26e5af7 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -6228,7 +6229,18 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (scsi_debug_lbp()) {
> +		sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
> +		meta_data_locked = true;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = do_device_access(sip, scp, 0, lba, len, 0, true, true);

[Severity: High]
Does this code introduce a lock inversion deadlock with resp_comp_write()?

Here in resp_atomic_write(), the metadata lock is acquired before calling
do_device_access(), which acquires the data lock:

resp_atomic_write()
  sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
  do_device_access()
    sdeb_data_lock(sip, true)
      sdeb_data_write_lock(sip);

However, in resp_comp_write(), the locks are acquired in the reverse order:

resp_comp_write()
  sdeb_data_write_lock(sip);
  sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);

Could concurrent execution of write atomic (16) and compare and write
commands to the same target cause the scsi processing kworkers to deadlock?

> +	if (unlikely(scsi_debug_lbp()))
> +		map_region(sip, lba, len);

[Severity: Medium]
Could this result in a race condition due to evaluating scsi_debug_lbp() twice?

If an administrator modifies /sys/bus/pseudo/drivers/scsi_debug/fake_rw while
a write atomic (16) command is executing, the first evaluation could return
false, bypassing the lock acquisition. If the second evaluation then returns
true, map_region() would be executed without the metadata lock being held.

Could this be fixed by caching the result of the first evaluation,
or checking meta_data_locked instead?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917125445.1376493-8-cassel@kernel.org?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:12   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 14:01     ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15   ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260917131251.445AC1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox