From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for WRITE ATOMIC (16)
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:15:05 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cd95afa-b9d6-4993-a221-1560df8978dc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917125445.1376493-14-cassel@kernel.org>
On 2026/09/17 19:54, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> WRITE ATOMIC (16) is a write command, so on a zoned device it is subject
> to the access requirements of the zone that it addresses, and it advances
> the write pointer of a sequential write required zone. See ZBC-3 r06
> (T10/BSR INCITS 579), 4.5.3.3.2 Write access pattern requirements for
> sequential write required zones.
>
> resp_atomic_write() calls do_device_access() directly, without calling
> check_device_access_params() first and without advancing the write
> pointer afterwards. It is the only command that writes user data which
> does not; WRITE, WRITE SCATTERED and WRITE SAME all go through
> check_device_access_params(), which validates zone access for a zoned
> device.
>
> As a consequence, with zbc=managed atomic_wr=1, a WRITE ATOMIC (16) can
> write anywhere within a sequential write required zone regardless of its
> write pointer and zone condition, into a gap zone, or across a zone
> boundary, and none of it is reflected in the zone state. The write
> pointer is left where it was, so a subsequent REPORT ZONES does not
> describe the data on the medium, and the next write at that write
> pointer overwrites data that was written without error.
>
> Validate the access and advance the write pointer the way
> resp_write_dt0() does. The zone metadata write lock is already taken
> across the access for the provisioning map; take it for a zoned device
> too, as the write pointer has to be read and updated atomically with
> respect to other commands. Unlike an ordinary write, the write pointer
> is advanced only when all of the data was written, as an atomic write
> either completes or has no effect.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Fixes: 84f3a3c01d70 ("scsi: scsi_debug: Atomic write support")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
See my comment on v2.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> index 33f2df26e5af..b57d25d7214c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
> @@ -6229,15 +6229,29 @@ static int resp_atomic_write(struct scsi_cmnd *scp,
> }
> }
>
> - if (scsi_debug_lbp()) {
> + if (sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip) || scsi_debug_lbp()) {
> sdeb_meta_write_lock(sip);
> meta_data_locked = true;
> }
>
> + ret = check_device_access_params(scp, lba, len, true);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (meta_data_locked)
> + sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> ret = do_device_access(sip, scp, 0, lba, len, 0, true, true);
> if (unlikely(scsi_debug_lbp()))
> map_region(sip, lba, len);
>
> + /*
> + * If ZBC zone then bump its write pointer, but only if all of the data
> + * was written: an atomic write either completes or has no effect.
> + */
> + if (sdebug_dev_is_zoned(devip) && ret == len * sdebug_sector_size)
> + zbc_inc_wp(devip, lba, len);
> +
> if (meta_data_locked)
> sdeb_meta_write_unlock(sip);
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 14:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cd95afa-b9d6-4993-a221-1560df8978dc@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox