From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 20:13:29 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aab12a4d-9895-4f90-9911-856699bc9094@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917125445.1376493-11-cassel@kernel.org>
On 2026/09/17 19:54, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> resp_write_dt0() and resp_write_scat() advance the write pointer of a
> sequential write required zone by the transfer length of the command
> before looking at what do_device_access() returned. It does not always
> move that much data: it returns -1 when the data direction of the
> command does not match the operation, and a short byte count when the
> data-out buffer is smaller than the transfer length, both of which an
> initiator can produce with SG_IO. The first terminates the command, the
> second completes it with GOOD status and a residual.
>
> The zone state then describes more data than is on the medium, and a
> write at the position where the data really ends is terminated with
> UNALIGNED WRITE COMMAND, because the write pointer has moved beyond it.
> The zone has to be reset before it can be written to again.
>
> Advance the write pointer over the data that was written instead. As
> do_device_access() does not write a partial physical block, what it
> reports is a whole number of physical blocks, so the write pointer is
> left on a physical block boundary, which is where a write can end.
>
> resp_write_same() does not need the same treatment, as it writes with
> memmove() and cannot fail part way through.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Fixes: f0d1cf9378bd ("scsi: scsi_debug: Add ZBC zone commands")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
OK. So you read my mind :)
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 12:54 [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Report the residual of a write Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 13:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Do not write a partial physical block Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:47 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Advance the write pointer over the data written Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:13 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Enforce physical block alignment of zoned writes Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Map the region written by WRITE ATOMIC (16) Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 14:01 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] scsi: scsi_debug: Validate zone access for " Niklas Cassel
2026-09-17 13:15 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-09-17 13:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] scsi: scsi_debug: fix zoned write validation Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aab12a4d-9895-4f90-9911-856699bc9094@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox