Re: HT action frame code

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]

On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 23:48 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> wrote:
> > Johannes Berg wrote:
> >>
> >> When we're an AP, shouldn't we also in some way honour the block-ack
> >> action frames? Or will that be done in hostapd, which then sets up
> >> block-ack via some unspecified way?
> >
> > The current design assumes that hostapd takes care of all management frames,
> > so eyes, these would need to go to hostapd for processing and then setup
> > back to mac80211 through some new command..
> >
> Enable BA in AP mode is really trivial. It definitely worked in our AP project.

Well but we aren't processing any requests from associated STAs, so
maybe you only had aggregation enabled when the local rate scaling
decided to?

johannes

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]