From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: "Jouni Malinen" <j@w1.fi>,
"Ron Rindjunsky" <rindjon@googlemail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HT action frame code
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 13:21:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240809090321w4d2f3780g32e9507fac45f95e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220954146.31304.127.camel@johannes.berg>
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 12:52 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>
>> > Well yes, but that just triggers when aggregation on our end, what I'd
>> > been thinking about was when the remote side wants to start aggregation.
>>
>> There is some misunderstanding. I hope I'm explaining the problematic
>> part. Aggregation is always initialized by TX side it's one direction
>> only. So if there AP and STA wants to start aggregation. Both will
>> open a stream. The streams are independent.
>
> Right. And if mac80211 is the AP, then I don't see how the STA can start
> aggregation since I couldn't find where the relevant action frames are
> handled. But you said it's not part of the code now, so I couldn't find
> it anyway.
That's probably the current situation.
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 14:22 HT action frame code Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 20:09 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-09-08 20:48 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 6:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 6:33 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 8:14 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 8:46 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 8:52 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 9:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 9:42 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 9:52 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 9:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:21 ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-09-09 10:25 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:53 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 11:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 11:29 ` [RFC] mac80211: make BA session handling independent of STA mode Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 12:28 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ba2fa240809090321w4d2f3780g32e9507fac45f95e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rindjon@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox