Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
To: "Jouni Malinen" <j@w1.fi>
Cc: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Ron Rindjunsky" <rindjon@googlemail.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HT action frame code
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:48:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ba2fa240809081348n17a3b4c5o4d67e989dfd79030@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C5868B.8060103@w1.fi>

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
>>
>> When we're an AP, shouldn't we also in some way honour the block-ack
>> action frames? Or will that be done in hostapd, which then sets up
>> block-ack via some unspecified way?
>
> The current design assumes that hostapd takes care of all management frames,
> so eyes, these would need to go to hostapd for processing and then setup
> back to mac80211 through some new command..
>
Enable BA in AP mode is really trivial. It definitely worked in our AP project.
Tomas

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-08 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-08 14:22 HT action frame code Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 20:09 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-09-08 20:48   ` Tomas Winkler [this message]
2008-09-09  6:30     ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09  6:33   ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09  8:14     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09  8:20       ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09  8:46         ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09  8:52           ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09  9:41             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09  9:42               ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09  9:52                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09  9:55                   ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:21                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 10:25                       ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:27                         ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:53                           ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 11:01                             ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 11:29                               ` [RFC] mac80211: make BA session handling independent of STA mode Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 12:28                                 ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ba2fa240809081348n17a3b4c5o4d67e989dfd79030@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tomasw@gmail.com \
    --cc=j@w1.fi \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rindjon@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox