Re: HT action frame code

["Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:46 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>
>> Meaning that other management frames are forward to user space while
>> BA action frames
>> are treated inside mac80211.
>
> Can you point out where? I don't see it.
It's should be visible in AP code Yi has posted, unfortunately don't
have it open right now. Anyhow since then the rx flow has changed a
lot as you know :) so it has to be reinvented.

>
>
>> > Also, I'm not talking about the AP triggering the aggregation session,
>> > this is entirely done with the rate scaling right now, but about an
>> > associated STA wanting to start an aggregation session. Aren't
>> > aggregation sessions always triggered by whoever wants to send? So if a
>> > STA notices it has lots of upload going on it could want to trigger a BA
>> > session, which is something we don't currently support afaict.
>>
>> In iwl-agn-rs.c There is not difference if the peer is STA or AP. So
>> we support this already.
>
> Not sure what this has to do with the Intel RS algorithm?

Just the trigger for aggregation is implemented there. Otherwise
nothing special.

Tomas