From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>, Ron Rindjunsky <rindjon@googlemail.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HT action frame code
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:52:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220950358.31304.112.camel@johannes.berg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240809090146p612083aclf3a2a924a81e75e9@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080909_104625_349198_14BEFBEC)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 848 bytes --]
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 11:46 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Meaning that other management frames are forward to user space while
> BA action frames
> are treated inside mac80211.
Can you point out where? I don't see it.
> > Also, I'm not talking about the AP triggering the aggregation session,
> > this is entirely done with the rate scaling right now, but about an
> > associated STA wanting to start an aggregation session. Aren't
> > aggregation sessions always triggered by whoever wants to send? So if a
> > STA notices it has lots of upload going on it could want to trigger a BA
> > session, which is something we don't currently support afaict.
>
> In iwl-agn-rs.c There is not difference if the peer is STA or AP. So
> we support this already.
Not sure what this has to do with the Intel RS algorithm?
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 14:22 HT action frame code Johannes Berg
2008-09-08 20:09 ` Jouni Malinen
2008-09-08 20:48 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 6:30 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 6:33 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 8:14 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 8:20 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 8:46 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 8:52 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2008-09-09 9:41 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 9:42 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 9:52 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 9:55 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:21 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 10:25 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:27 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 10:53 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-09-09 11:01 ` Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 11:29 ` [RFC] mac80211: make BA session handling independent of STA mode Johannes Berg
2008-09-09 12:28 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1220950358.31304.112.camel@johannes.berg \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=j@w1.fi \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rindjon@googlemail.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox