From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cem@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: re-use refcount scrub/repair code for rtrefcount
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 16:08:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002211038.2139655-4-sandeen@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002211038.2139655-1-sandeen@redhat.com>
Some code in scrub/rtrefcount.c is copied from scrub/refcount.c; it
differs only in function & structure names and a couple types and
macros, which share the same underlying types and values.
Similarly for code in fs/xfs/scrub/[rt]refcount_repair.c
Export the refcount versions, use them for rtrefcount scrubbing,
eliminate the copies, and add build-time asserts so that the type/value
matches mentioned above do not drift.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c | 27 +---
fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h | 56 +++++++
fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c | 3 +-
fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c | 263 +------------------------------
fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c | 39 +----
5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 316 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
index f8c51d8fbb3d..c18bb89325a5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "scrub/btree.h"
#include "scrub/trace.h"
#include "scrub/repair.h"
+#include "scrub/refcount.h"
/*
* Set us up to scrub reference count btrees.
@@ -80,24 +81,6 @@ xchk_setup_ag_refcountbt(
* If the refcount is correct, all the check conditions in the algorithm
* should always hold true. If not, the refcount is incorrect.
*/
-struct xchk_refcnt_frag {
- struct list_head list;
- struct xfs_rmap_irec rm;
-};
-
-struct xchk_refcnt_check {
- struct xfs_scrub *sc;
- struct list_head fragments;
-
- /* refcount extent we're examining */
- xfs_agblock_t bno;
- xfs_extlen_t len;
- xfs_nlink_t refcount;
-
- /* number of owners seen */
- xfs_nlink_t seen;
-};
-
/*
* Decide if the given rmap is large enough that we can redeem it
* towards refcount verification now, or if it's a fragment, in
@@ -105,7 +88,7 @@ struct xchk_refcnt_check {
* discover that we've collected exactly the correct number of
* fragments as the refcountbt says we should have.
*/
-STATIC int
+int
xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(
struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
@@ -159,7 +142,7 @@ xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(
* number of extents that totally covered the refcountbt extent),
* we have a refcountbt error.
*/
-STATIC void
+void
xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
struct xchk_refcnt_check *refchk)
{
@@ -290,7 +273,7 @@ xchk_refcountbt_xref_rmap(
.bno = irec->rc_startblock,
.len = irec->rc_blockcount,
.refcount = irec->rc_refcount,
- .seen = 0,
+ .seen = 0,
};
struct xfs_rmap_irec low;
struct xfs_rmap_irec high;
@@ -355,7 +338,7 @@ struct xchk_refcbt_records {
enum xfs_refc_domain prev_domain;
};
-STATIC int
+int
xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap(
struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0706afd9f80b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017-2023 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
+ * Author: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
+ */
+#ifndef __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__
+#define __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__
+
+/*
+ * Ensure that types and macros match across rt and non-rt variants,
+ * as this code is shared for both.
+ */
+static_assert(__same_type(xfs_agblock_t, xfs_rgblock_t));
+static_assert(NULLAGBLOCK == NULLRGBLOCK);
+
+/*
+ * Confirming reference counts via reverse mappings.
+ *
+ * These helpers are shared by the AG (refcount.c) and realtime
+ * (rtrefcount.c) refcount scrubbers. Both the rmap and refcount incore
+ * records use xfs_agblock_t for their start block regardless of whether the
+ * data lives in an allocation group or a realtime group, so the fragment
+ * bookkeeping here uses xfs_agblock_t for group-relative block numbers.
+ */
+struct xchk_refcnt_frag {
+ struct list_head list;
+ struct xfs_rmap_irec rm;
+};
+
+struct xchk_refcnt_check {
+ struct xfs_scrub *sc;
+ struct list_head fragments;
+
+ /* refcount extent we're examining */
+ xfs_agblock_t bno;
+ xfs_extlen_t len;
+ xfs_nlink_t refcount;
+
+ /* number of owners seen */
+ xfs_nlink_t seen;
+};
+
+int xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
+ const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec, void *priv);
+void xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(struct xchk_refcnt_check *refchk);
+int xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
+ const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec, void *priv);
+
+/*
+ * Compare two refcount records so that both the AG (refcount_repair.c) and
+ * realtime (rtrefcount_repair.c) rebuilders sort staged records into the same
+ * order as the ondisk records.
+ */
+int xrep_refc_extent_cmp(const void *a, const void *b);
+
+#endif /* __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__ */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
index ca9c382005ff..72de263117a7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include "scrub/newbt.h"
#include "scrub/reap.h"
#include "scrub/rcbag.h"
+#include "scrub/refcount.h"
/*
* Rebuilding the Reference Count Btree
@@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ xrep_refc_encode_startblock(
}
/* Sort in the same order as the ondisk records. */
-static int
+int
xrep_refc_extent_cmp(
const void *a,
const void *b)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
index 460e3f094adf..b78784051308 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include "scrub/common.h"
#include "scrub/btree.h"
#include "scrub/repair.h"
+#include "scrub/refcount.h"
/* Set us up with the realtime refcount metadata locked. */
int
@@ -59,248 +60,13 @@ xchk_setup_rtrefcountbt(
/* Realtime Reference count btree scrubber. */
-/*
- * Confirming Reference Counts via Reverse Mappings
- *
- * We want to count the reverse mappings overlapping a refcount record
- * (bno, len, refcount), allowing for the possibility that some of the
- * overlap may come from smaller adjoining reverse mappings, while some
- * comes from single extents which overlap the range entirely. The
- * outer loop is as follows:
- *
- * 1. For all reverse mappings overlapping the refcount extent,
- * a. If a given rmap completely overlaps, mark it as seen.
- * b. Otherwise, record the fragment (in agbno order) for later
- * processing.
- *
- * Once we've seen all the rmaps, we know that for all blocks in the
- * refcount record we want to find $refcount owners and we've already
- * visited $seen extents that overlap all the blocks. Therefore, we
- * need to find ($refcount - $seen) owners for every block in the
- * extent; call that quantity $target_nr. Proceed as follows:
- *
- * 2. Pull the first $target_nr fragments from the list; all of them
- * should start at or before the start of the extent.
- * Call this subset of fragments the working set.
- * 3. Until there are no more unprocessed fragments,
- * a. Find the shortest fragments in the set and remove them.
- * b. Note the block number of the end of these fragments.
- * c. Pull the same number of fragments from the list. All of these
- * fragments should start at the block number recorded in the
- * previous step.
- * d. Put those fragments in the set.
- * 4. Check that there are $target_nr fragments remaining in the list,
- * and that they all end at or beyond the end of the refcount extent.
- *
- * If the refcount is correct, all the check conditions in the algorithm
- * should always hold true. If not, the refcount is incorrect.
- */
-struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag {
- struct list_head list;
- struct xfs_rmap_irec rm;
-};
-
-struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check {
- struct xfs_scrub *sc;
- struct list_head fragments;
-
- /* refcount extent we're examining */
- xfs_rgblock_t bno;
- xfs_extlen_t len;
- xfs_nlink_t refcount;
-
- /* number of owners seen */
- xfs_nlink_t seen;
-};
-
-/*
- * Decide if the given rmap is large enough that we can redeem it
- * towards refcount verification now, or if it's a fragment, in
- * which case we'll hang onto it in the hopes that we'll later
- * discover that we've collected exactly the correct number of
- * fragments as the rtrefcountbt says we should have.
- */
-STATIC int
-xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check(
- struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
- const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
- void *priv)
-{
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check *refchk = priv;
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *frag;
- xfs_rgblock_t rm_last;
- xfs_rgblock_t rc_last;
- int error = 0;
-
- if (xchk_should_terminate(refchk->sc, &error))
- return error;
-
- rm_last = rec->rm_startblock + rec->rm_blockcount - 1;
- rc_last = refchk->bno + refchk->len - 1;
-
- /* Confirm that a single-owner refc extent is a CoW stage. */
- if (refchk->refcount == 1 && rec->rm_owner != XFS_RMAP_OWN_COW) {
- xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(refchk->sc, cur, 0);
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (rec->rm_startblock <= refchk->bno && rm_last >= rc_last) {
- /*
- * The rmap overlaps the refcount record, so we can confirm
- * one refcount owner seen.
- */
- refchk->seen++;
- } else {
- /*
- * This rmap covers only part of the refcount record, so
- * save the fragment for later processing. If the rmapbt
- * is healthy each rmap_irec we see will be in agbno order
- * so we don't need insertion sort here.
- */
- frag = kmalloc_obj(struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag, XCHK_GFP_FLAGS);
- if (!frag)
- return -ENOMEM;
- memcpy(&frag->rm, rec, sizeof(frag->rm));
- list_add_tail(&frag->list, &refchk->fragments);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * Given a bunch of rmap fragments, iterate through them, keeping
- * a running tally of the refcount. If this ever deviates from
- * what we expect (which is the rtrefcountbt's refcount minus the
- * number of extents that totally covered the rtrefcountbt extent),
- * we have a rtrefcountbt error.
- */
-STATIC void
-xchk_rtrefcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check *refchk)
-{
- struct list_head worklist;
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *frag;
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *n;
- xfs_rgblock_t bno;
- xfs_rgblock_t rbno;
- xfs_rgblock_t next_rbno;
- xfs_nlink_t nr;
- xfs_nlink_t target_nr;
-
- target_nr = refchk->refcount - refchk->seen;
- if (target_nr == 0)
- return;
-
- /*
- * There are (refchk->rc.rc_refcount - refchk->nr refcount)
- * references we haven't found yet. Pull that many off the
- * fragment list and figure out where the smallest rmap ends
- * (and therefore the next rmap should start). All the rmaps
- * we pull off should start at or before the beginning of the
- * refcount record's range.
- */
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worklist);
- rbno = NULLRGBLOCK;
-
- /* Make sure the fragments actually /are/ in bno order. */
- bno = 0;
- list_for_each_entry(frag, &refchk->fragments, list) {
- if (frag->rm.rm_startblock < bno)
- goto done;
- bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock;
- }
-
- /*
- * Find all the rmaps that start at or before the refc extent,
- * and put them on the worklist.
- */
- nr = 0;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
- if (frag->rm.rm_startblock > refchk->bno || nr > target_nr)
- break;
- bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
- if (bno < rbno)
- rbno = bno;
- list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
- nr++;
- }
-
- /*
- * We should have found exactly $target_nr rmap fragments starting
- * at or before the refcount extent.
- */
- if (nr != target_nr)
- goto done;
-
- while (!list_empty(&refchk->fragments)) {
- /* Discard any fragments ending at rbno from the worklist. */
- nr = 0;
- next_rbno = NULLRGBLOCK;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &worklist, list) {
- bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
- if (bno != rbno) {
- if (bno < next_rbno)
- next_rbno = bno;
- continue;
- }
- list_del(&frag->list);
- kfree(frag);
- nr++;
- }
-
- /* Try to add nr rmaps starting at rbno to the worklist. */
- list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
- bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
- if (frag->rm.rm_startblock != rbno)
- goto done;
- list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
- if (next_rbno > bno)
- next_rbno = bno;
- nr--;
- if (nr == 0)
- break;
- }
-
- /*
- * If we get here and nr > 0, this means that we added fewer
- * items to the worklist than we discarded because the fragment
- * list ran out of items. Therefore, we cannot maintain the
- * required refcount. Something is wrong, so we're done.
- */
- if (nr)
- goto done;
-
- rbno = next_rbno;
- }
-
- /*
- * Make sure the last extent we processed ends at or beyond
- * the end of the refcount extent.
- */
- if (rbno < refchk->bno + refchk->len)
- goto done;
-
- /* Actually record us having seen the remaining refcount. */
- refchk->seen = refchk->refcount;
-done:
- /* Delete fragments and work list. */
- list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &worklist, list) {
- list_del(&frag->list);
- kfree(frag);
- }
- list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
- list_del(&frag->list);
- kfree(frag);
- }
-}
-
/* Use the rmap entries covering this extent to verify the refcount. */
STATIC void
xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
struct xfs_scrub *sc,
const struct xfs_refcount_irec *irec)
{
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check refchk = {
+ struct xchk_refcnt_check refchk = {
.sc = sc,
.bno = irec->rc_startblock,
.len = irec->rc_blockcount,
@@ -309,8 +75,8 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
};
struct xfs_rmap_irec low;
struct xfs_rmap_irec high;
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *frag;
- struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *n;
+ struct xchk_refcnt_frag *frag;
+ struct xchk_refcnt_frag *n;
int error;
if (!sc->sr.rmap_cur || xchk_skip_xref(sc->sm))
@@ -324,11 +90,11 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&refchk.fragments);
error = xfs_rmap_query_range(sc->sr.rmap_cur, &low, &high,
- xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check, &refchk);
+ xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check, &refchk);
if (!xchk_should_check_xref(sc, &error, &sc->sr.rmap_cur))
goto out_free;
- xchk_rtrefcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(&refchk);
+ xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(&refchk);
if (irec->rc_refcount != refchk.seen)
xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sr.rmap_cur, 0);
@@ -408,21 +174,6 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_check_mergeable(
memcpy(&rrc->prev_rec, irec, sizeof(struct xfs_refcount_irec));
}
-STATIC int
-xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check_gap(
- struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
- const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
- void *priv)
-{
- xfs_rgblock_t *next_bno = priv;
-
- if (*next_bno != NULLRGBLOCK && rec->rm_startblock < *next_bno)
- return -ECANCELED;
-
- *next_bno = rec->rm_startblock + rec->rm_blockcount;
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* Make sure that a gap in the reference count records does not correspond to
* overlapping records (i.e. shared extents) in the reverse mappings.
@@ -448,7 +199,7 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_gaps(
high.rm_startblock = bno - 1;
error = xfs_rmap_query_range(sc->sr.rmap_cur, &low, &high,
- xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check_gap, &next_bno);
+ xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap, &next_bno);
if (error == -ECANCELED)
xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sr.rmap_cur, 0);
else
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
index c78a6d2990c5..5ca9959dfacc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "scrub/newbt.h"
#include "scrub/reap.h"
#include "scrub/rcbag.h"
+#include "scrub/refcount.h"
/*
* Rebuilding the Reference Count Btree
@@ -266,42 +267,6 @@ xrep_rtrefc_walk_rmaps(
return 0;
}
-static inline uint32_t
-xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(
- const struct xfs_refcount_irec *irec)
-{
- uint32_t start;
-
- start = irec->rc_startblock & ~XFS_REFC_COWFLAG;
- if (irec->rc_domain == XFS_REFC_DOMAIN_COW)
- start |= XFS_REFC_COWFLAG;
-
- return start;
-}
-
-/*
- * Compare two refcount records. We want to sort in order of increasing block
- * number.
- */
-static int
-xrep_rtrefc_extent_cmp(
- const void *a,
- const void *b)
-{
- const struct xfs_refcount_irec *ap = a;
- const struct xfs_refcount_irec *bp = b;
- uint32_t sa, sb;
-
- sa = xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(ap);
- sb = xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(bp);
-
- if (sa > sb)
- return 1;
- if (sa < sb)
- return -1;
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* Sort the refcount extents by startblock or else the btree records will be in
* the wrong order. Make sure the records do not overlap in physical space.
@@ -316,7 +281,7 @@ xrep_rtrefc_sort_records(
xfs_rgblock_t next_rgbno = 0;
int error;
- error = xfarray_sort(rr->refcount_records, xrep_rtrefc_extent_cmp,
+ error = xfarray_sort(rr->refcount_records, xrep_refc_extent_cmp,
XFARRAY_SORT_KILLABLE);
if (error)
return error;
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 21:08 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: more misc code deduplication Eric Sandeen
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_sf_copy_entries helper Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 12:14 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: factor out xrep_reset_fork_to_extents helper for scrub/repair Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 13:07 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-05 14:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 19:11 ` [PATCH V2 " Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 20:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 21:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-06 8:32 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:25 ` [PATCH V3 " Eric Sandeen
2026-10-08 11:02 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-02 21:08 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2026-10-05 20:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: re-use refcount scrub/repair code for rtrefcount Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-06 8:25 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-07 15:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-08 11:15 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-08 11:09 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-08 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfs: more misc code deduplication Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002211038.2139655-4-sandeen@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox