Linux XFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, cem@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: re-use refcount scrub/repair code for rtrefcount
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:38:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005203831.GE2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002211038.2139655-4-sandeen@redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 04:08:11PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Some code in scrub/rtrefcount.c is copied from scrub/refcount.c; it
> differs only in function & structure names and a couple types and
> macros, which share the same underlying types and values.
> 
> Similarly for code in fs/xfs/scrub/[rt]refcount_repair.c
> 
> Export the refcount versions, use them for rtrefcount scrubbing,
> eliminate the copies, and add build-time asserts so that the type/value
> matches mentioned above do not drift.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

Looks good, deletes much!
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c          |  27 +---
>  fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h          |  56 +++++++
>  fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c   |   3 +-
>  fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c        | 263 +------------------------------
>  fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c |  39 +----
>  5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 316 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
> index f8c51d8fbb3d..c18bb89325a5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include "scrub/btree.h"
>  #include "scrub/trace.h"
>  #include "scrub/repair.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Set us up to scrub reference count btrees.
> @@ -80,24 +81,6 @@ xchk_setup_ag_refcountbt(
>   * If the refcount is correct, all the check conditions in the algorithm
>   * should always hold true.  If not, the refcount is incorrect.
>   */
> -struct xchk_refcnt_frag {
> -	struct list_head	list;
> -	struct xfs_rmap_irec	rm;
> -};
> -
> -struct xchk_refcnt_check {
> -	struct xfs_scrub	*sc;
> -	struct list_head	fragments;
> -
> -	/* refcount extent we're examining */
> -	xfs_agblock_t		bno;
> -	xfs_extlen_t		len;
> -	xfs_nlink_t		refcount;
> -
> -	/* number of owners seen */
> -	xfs_nlink_t		seen;
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * Decide if the given rmap is large enough that we can redeem it
>   * towards refcount verification now, or if it's a fragment, in
> @@ -105,7 +88,7 @@ struct xchk_refcnt_check {
>   * discover that we've collected exactly the correct number of
>   * fragments as the refcountbt says we should have.
>   */
> -STATIC int
> +int
>  xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(
>  	struct xfs_btree_cur		*cur,
>  	const struct xfs_rmap_irec	*rec,
> @@ -159,7 +142,7 @@ xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(
>   * number of extents that totally covered the refcountbt extent),
>   * we have a refcountbt error.
>   */
> -STATIC void
> +void
>  xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
>  	struct xchk_refcnt_check	*refchk)
>  {
> @@ -290,7 +273,7 @@ xchk_refcountbt_xref_rmap(
>  		.bno			= irec->rc_startblock,
>  		.len			= irec->rc_blockcount,
>  		.refcount		= irec->rc_refcount,
> -		.seen = 0,
> +		.seen			= 0,
>  	};
>  	struct xfs_rmap_irec		low;
>  	struct xfs_rmap_irec		high;
> @@ -355,7 +338,7 @@ struct xchk_refcbt_records {
>  	enum xfs_refc_domain	prev_domain;
>  };
>  
> -STATIC int
> +int
>  xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap(
>  	struct xfs_btree_cur		*cur,
>  	const struct xfs_rmap_irec	*rec,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0706afd9f80b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017-2023 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> + * Author: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> + */
> +#ifndef __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__
> +#define __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__
> +
> +/*
> + * Ensure that types and macros match across rt and non-rt variants,
> + * as this code is shared for both.
> + */
> +static_assert(__same_type(xfs_agblock_t, xfs_rgblock_t));
> +static_assert(NULLAGBLOCK == NULLRGBLOCK);
> +
> +/*
> + * Confirming reference counts via reverse mappings.
> + *
> + * These helpers are shared by the AG (refcount.c) and realtime
> + * (rtrefcount.c) refcount scrubbers.  Both the rmap and refcount incore
> + * records use xfs_agblock_t for their start block regardless of whether the
> + * data lives in an allocation group or a realtime group, so the fragment
> + * bookkeeping here uses xfs_agblock_t for group-relative block numbers.
> + */
> +struct xchk_refcnt_frag {
> +	struct list_head	list;
> +	struct xfs_rmap_irec	rm;
> +};
> +
> +struct xchk_refcnt_check {
> +	struct xfs_scrub	*sc;
> +	struct list_head	fragments;
> +
> +	/* refcount extent we're examining */
> +	xfs_agblock_t		bno;
> +	xfs_extlen_t		len;
> +	xfs_nlink_t		refcount;
> +
> +	/* number of owners seen */
> +	xfs_nlink_t		seen;
> +};
> +
> +int xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> +		const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec, void *priv);
> +void xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(struct xchk_refcnt_check *refchk);
> +int xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> +		const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec, void *priv);
> +
> +/*
> + * Compare two refcount records so that both the AG (refcount_repair.c) and
> + * realtime (rtrefcount_repair.c) rebuilders sort staged records into the same
> + * order as the ondisk records.
> + */
> +int xrep_refc_extent_cmp(const void *a, const void *b);
> +
> +#endif /* __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
> index ca9c382005ff..72de263117a7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #include "scrub/newbt.h"
>  #include "scrub/reap.h"
>  #include "scrub/rcbag.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Rebuilding the Reference Count Btree
> @@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ xrep_refc_encode_startblock(
>  }
>  
>  /* Sort in the same order as the ondisk records. */
> -static int
> +int
>  xrep_refc_extent_cmp(
>  	const void			*a,
>  	const void			*b)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
> index 460e3f094adf..b78784051308 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include "scrub/common.h"
>  #include "scrub/btree.h"
>  #include "scrub/repair.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>  
>  /* Set us up with the realtime refcount metadata locked. */
>  int
> @@ -59,248 +60,13 @@ xchk_setup_rtrefcountbt(
>  
>  /* Realtime Reference count btree scrubber. */
>  
> -/*
> - * Confirming Reference Counts via Reverse Mappings
> - *
> - * We want to count the reverse mappings overlapping a refcount record
> - * (bno, len, refcount), allowing for the possibility that some of the
> - * overlap may come from smaller adjoining reverse mappings, while some
> - * comes from single extents which overlap the range entirely.  The
> - * outer loop is as follows:
> - *
> - * 1. For all reverse mappings overlapping the refcount extent,
> - *    a. If a given rmap completely overlaps, mark it as seen.
> - *    b. Otherwise, record the fragment (in agbno order) for later
> - *       processing.
> - *
> - * Once we've seen all the rmaps, we know that for all blocks in the
> - * refcount record we want to find $refcount owners and we've already
> - * visited $seen extents that overlap all the blocks.  Therefore, we
> - * need to find ($refcount - $seen) owners for every block in the
> - * extent; call that quantity $target_nr.  Proceed as follows:
> - *
> - * 2. Pull the first $target_nr fragments from the list; all of them
> - *    should start at or before the start of the extent.
> - *    Call this subset of fragments the working set.
> - * 3. Until there are no more unprocessed fragments,
> - *    a. Find the shortest fragments in the set and remove them.
> - *    b. Note the block number of the end of these fragments.
> - *    c. Pull the same number of fragments from the list.  All of these
> - *       fragments should start at the block number recorded in the
> - *       previous step.
> - *    d. Put those fragments in the set.
> - * 4. Check that there are $target_nr fragments remaining in the list,
> - *    and that they all end at or beyond the end of the refcount extent.
> - *
> - * If the refcount is correct, all the check conditions in the algorithm
> - * should always hold true.  If not, the refcount is incorrect.
> - */
> -struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag {
> -	struct list_head	list;
> -	struct xfs_rmap_irec	rm;
> -};
> -
> -struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check {
> -	struct xfs_scrub	*sc;
> -	struct list_head	fragments;
> -
> -	/* refcount extent we're examining */
> -	xfs_rgblock_t		bno;
> -	xfs_extlen_t		len;
> -	xfs_nlink_t		refcount;
> -
> -	/* number of owners seen */
> -	xfs_nlink_t		seen;
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * Decide if the given rmap is large enough that we can redeem it
> - * towards refcount verification now, or if it's a fragment, in
> - * which case we'll hang onto it in the hopes that we'll later
> - * discover that we've collected exactly the correct number of
> - * fragments as the rtrefcountbt says we should have.
> - */
> -STATIC int
> -xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check(
> -	struct xfs_btree_cur		*cur,
> -	const struct xfs_rmap_irec	*rec,
> -	void				*priv)
> -{
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check	*refchk = priv;
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag	*frag;
> -	xfs_rgblock_t			rm_last;
> -	xfs_rgblock_t			rc_last;
> -	int				error = 0;
> -
> -	if (xchk_should_terminate(refchk->sc, &error))
> -		return error;
> -
> -	rm_last = rec->rm_startblock + rec->rm_blockcount - 1;
> -	rc_last = refchk->bno + refchk->len - 1;
> -
> -	/* Confirm that a single-owner refc extent is a CoW stage. */
> -	if (refchk->refcount == 1 && rec->rm_owner != XFS_RMAP_OWN_COW) {
> -		xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(refchk->sc, cur, 0);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (rec->rm_startblock <= refchk->bno && rm_last >= rc_last) {
> -		/*
> -		 * The rmap overlaps the refcount record, so we can confirm
> -		 * one refcount owner seen.
> -		 */
> -		refchk->seen++;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * This rmap covers only part of the refcount record, so
> -		 * save the fragment for later processing.  If the rmapbt
> -		 * is healthy each rmap_irec we see will be in agbno order
> -		 * so we don't need insertion sort here.
> -		 */
> -		frag = kmalloc_obj(struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag, XCHK_GFP_FLAGS);
> -		if (!frag)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -		memcpy(&frag->rm, rec, sizeof(frag->rm));
> -		list_add_tail(&frag->list, &refchk->fragments);
> -	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Given a bunch of rmap fragments, iterate through them, keeping
> - * a running tally of the refcount.  If this ever deviates from
> - * what we expect (which is the rtrefcountbt's refcount minus the
> - * number of extents that totally covered the rtrefcountbt extent),
> - * we have a rtrefcountbt error.
> - */
> -STATIC void
> -xchk_rtrefcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check	*refchk)
> -{
> -	struct list_head		worklist;
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag	*frag;
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag	*n;
> -	xfs_rgblock_t			bno;
> -	xfs_rgblock_t			rbno;
> -	xfs_rgblock_t			next_rbno;
> -	xfs_nlink_t			nr;
> -	xfs_nlink_t			target_nr;
> -
> -	target_nr = refchk->refcount - refchk->seen;
> -	if (target_nr == 0)
> -		return;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * There are (refchk->rc.rc_refcount - refchk->nr refcount)
> -	 * references we haven't found yet.  Pull that many off the
> -	 * fragment list and figure out where the smallest rmap ends
> -	 * (and therefore the next rmap should start).  All the rmaps
> -	 * we pull off should start at or before the beginning of the
> -	 * refcount record's range.
> -	 */
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worklist);
> -	rbno = NULLRGBLOCK;
> -
> -	/* Make sure the fragments actually /are/ in bno order. */
> -	bno = 0;
> -	list_for_each_entry(frag, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> -		if (frag->rm.rm_startblock < bno)
> -			goto done;
> -		bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Find all the rmaps that start at or before the refc extent,
> -	 * and put them on the worklist.
> -	 */
> -	nr = 0;
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> -		if (frag->rm.rm_startblock > refchk->bno || nr > target_nr)
> -			break;
> -		bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
> -		if (bno < rbno)
> -			rbno = bno;
> -		list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
> -		nr++;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We should have found exactly $target_nr rmap fragments starting
> -	 * at or before the refcount extent.
> -	 */
> -	if (nr != target_nr)
> -		goto done;
> -
> -	while (!list_empty(&refchk->fragments)) {
> -		/* Discard any fragments ending at rbno from the worklist. */
> -		nr = 0;
> -		next_rbno = NULLRGBLOCK;
> -		list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &worklist, list) {
> -			bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
> -			if (bno != rbno) {
> -				if (bno < next_rbno)
> -					next_rbno = bno;
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -			list_del(&frag->list);
> -			kfree(frag);
> -			nr++;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* Try to add nr rmaps starting at rbno to the worklist. */
> -		list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> -			bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
> -			if (frag->rm.rm_startblock != rbno)
> -				goto done;
> -			list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
> -			if (next_rbno > bno)
> -				next_rbno = bno;
> -			nr--;
> -			if (nr == 0)
> -				break;
> -		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * If we get here and nr > 0, this means that we added fewer
> -		 * items to the worklist than we discarded because the fragment
> -		 * list ran out of items.  Therefore, we cannot maintain the
> -		 * required refcount.  Something is wrong, so we're done.
> -		 */
> -		if (nr)
> -			goto done;
> -
> -		rbno = next_rbno;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Make sure the last extent we processed ends at or beyond
> -	 * the end of the refcount extent.
> -	 */
> -	if (rbno < refchk->bno + refchk->len)
> -		goto done;
> -
> -	/* Actually record us having seen the remaining refcount. */
> -	refchk->seen = refchk->refcount;
> -done:
> -	/* Delete fragments and work list. */
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &worklist, list) {
> -		list_del(&frag->list);
> -		kfree(frag);
> -	}
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> -		list_del(&frag->list);
> -		kfree(frag);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  /* Use the rmap entries covering this extent to verify the refcount. */
>  STATIC void
>  xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
>  	struct xfs_scrub		*sc,
>  	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*irec)
>  {
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check	refchk = {
> +	struct xchk_refcnt_check	refchk = {
>  		.sc			= sc,
>  		.bno			= irec->rc_startblock,
>  		.len			= irec->rc_blockcount,
> @@ -309,8 +75,8 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
>  	};
>  	struct xfs_rmap_irec		low;
>  	struct xfs_rmap_irec		high;
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag	*frag;
> -	struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag	*n;
> +	struct xchk_refcnt_frag		*frag;
> +	struct xchk_refcnt_frag		*n;
>  	int				error;
>  
>  	if (!sc->sr.rmap_cur || xchk_skip_xref(sc->sm))
> @@ -324,11 +90,11 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
>  
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&refchk.fragments);
>  	error = xfs_rmap_query_range(sc->sr.rmap_cur, &low, &high,
> -			xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check, &refchk);
> +			xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check, &refchk);
>  	if (!xchk_should_check_xref(sc, &error, &sc->sr.rmap_cur))
>  		goto out_free;
>  
> -	xchk_rtrefcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(&refchk);
> +	xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(&refchk);
>  	if (irec->rc_refcount != refchk.seen)
>  		xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sr.rmap_cur, 0);
>  
> @@ -408,21 +174,6 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_check_mergeable(
>  	memcpy(&rrc->prev_rec, irec, sizeof(struct xfs_refcount_irec));
>  }
>  
> -STATIC int
> -xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check_gap(
> -	struct xfs_btree_cur		*cur,
> -	const struct xfs_rmap_irec	*rec,
> -	void				*priv)
> -{
> -	xfs_rgblock_t			*next_bno = priv;
> -
> -	if (*next_bno != NULLRGBLOCK && rec->rm_startblock < *next_bno)
> -		return -ECANCELED;
> -
> -	*next_bno = rec->rm_startblock + rec->rm_blockcount;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Make sure that a gap in the reference count records does not correspond to
>   * overlapping records (i.e. shared extents) in the reverse mappings.
> @@ -448,7 +199,7 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_gaps(
>  	high.rm_startblock = bno - 1;
>  
>  	error = xfs_rmap_query_range(sc->sr.rmap_cur, &low, &high,
> -			xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check_gap, &next_bno);
> +			xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap, &next_bno);
>  	if (error == -ECANCELED)
>  		xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sr.rmap_cur, 0);
>  	else
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
> index c78a6d2990c5..5ca9959dfacc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>  #include "scrub/newbt.h"
>  #include "scrub/reap.h"
>  #include "scrub/rcbag.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Rebuilding the Reference Count Btree
> @@ -266,42 +267,6 @@ xrep_rtrefc_walk_rmaps(
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline uint32_t
> -xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(
> -	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*irec)
> -{
> -	uint32_t			start;
> -
> -	start = irec->rc_startblock & ~XFS_REFC_COWFLAG;
> -	if (irec->rc_domain == XFS_REFC_DOMAIN_COW)
> -		start |= XFS_REFC_COWFLAG;
> -
> -	return start;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Compare two refcount records.  We want to sort in order of increasing block
> - * number.
> - */
> -static int
> -xrep_rtrefc_extent_cmp(
> -	const void			*a,
> -	const void			*b)
> -{
> -	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*ap = a;
> -	const struct xfs_refcount_irec	*bp = b;
> -	uint32_t			sa, sb;
> -
> -	sa = xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(ap);
> -	sb = xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(bp);
> -
> -	if (sa > sb)
> -		return 1;
> -	if (sa < sb)
> -		return -1;
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  /*
>   * Sort the refcount extents by startblock or else the btree records will be in
>   * the wrong order.  Make sure the records do not overlap in physical space.
> @@ -316,7 +281,7 @@ xrep_rtrefc_sort_records(
>  	xfs_rgblock_t			next_rgbno = 0;
>  	int				error;
>  
> -	error = xfarray_sort(rr->refcount_records, xrep_rtrefc_extent_cmp,
> +	error = xfarray_sort(rr->refcount_records, xrep_refc_extent_cmp,
>  			XFARRAY_SORT_KILLABLE);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-05 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 21:08 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: more misc code deduplication Eric Sandeen
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_sf_copy_entries helper Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 12:14   ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: factor out xrep_reset_fork_to_extents helper for scrub/repair Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 13:07   ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-05 14:12     ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 19:11   ` [PATCH V2 " Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 20:20     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 20:43       ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 21:17         ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-06  8:32           ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:52             ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:25     ` [PATCH V3 " Eric Sandeen
2026-10-08 11:02       ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: re-use refcount scrub/repair code for rtrefcount Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 20:38   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-06  8:25   ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:32     ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-07 15:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-08 11:15         ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-08 11:09   ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-08 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfs: more misc code deduplication Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261005203831.GE2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox