From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, cem@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: re-use refcount scrub/repair code for rtrefcount
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:38:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005203831.GE2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002211038.2139655-4-sandeen@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 04:08:11PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Some code in scrub/rtrefcount.c is copied from scrub/refcount.c; it
> differs only in function & structure names and a couple types and
> macros, which share the same underlying types and values.
>
> Similarly for code in fs/xfs/scrub/[rt]refcount_repair.c
>
> Export the refcount versions, use them for rtrefcount scrubbing,
> eliminate the copies, and add build-time asserts so that the type/value
> matches mentioned above do not drift.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Looks good, deletes much!
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c | 27 +---
> fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h | 56 +++++++
> fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c | 3 +-
> fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c | 263 +------------------------------
> fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c | 39 +----
> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 316 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
> index f8c51d8fbb3d..c18bb89325a5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include "scrub/btree.h"
> #include "scrub/trace.h"
> #include "scrub/repair.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>
> /*
> * Set us up to scrub reference count btrees.
> @@ -80,24 +81,6 @@ xchk_setup_ag_refcountbt(
> * If the refcount is correct, all the check conditions in the algorithm
> * should always hold true. If not, the refcount is incorrect.
> */
> -struct xchk_refcnt_frag {
> - struct list_head list;
> - struct xfs_rmap_irec rm;
> -};
> -
> -struct xchk_refcnt_check {
> - struct xfs_scrub *sc;
> - struct list_head fragments;
> -
> - /* refcount extent we're examining */
> - xfs_agblock_t bno;
> - xfs_extlen_t len;
> - xfs_nlink_t refcount;
> -
> - /* number of owners seen */
> - xfs_nlink_t seen;
> -};
> -
> /*
> * Decide if the given rmap is large enough that we can redeem it
> * towards refcount verification now, or if it's a fragment, in
> @@ -105,7 +88,7 @@ struct xchk_refcnt_check {
> * discover that we've collected exactly the correct number of
> * fragments as the refcountbt says we should have.
> */
> -STATIC int
> +int
> xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
> @@ -159,7 +142,7 @@ xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(
> * number of extents that totally covered the refcountbt extent),
> * we have a refcountbt error.
> */
> -STATIC void
> +void
> xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
> struct xchk_refcnt_check *refchk)
> {
> @@ -290,7 +273,7 @@ xchk_refcountbt_xref_rmap(
> .bno = irec->rc_startblock,
> .len = irec->rc_blockcount,
> .refcount = irec->rc_refcount,
> - .seen = 0,
> + .seen = 0,
> };
> struct xfs_rmap_irec low;
> struct xfs_rmap_irec high;
> @@ -355,7 +338,7 @@ struct xchk_refcbt_records {
> enum xfs_refc_domain prev_domain;
> };
>
> -STATIC int
> +int
> xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap(
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0706afd9f80b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2017-2023 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
> + * Author: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> + */
> +#ifndef __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__
> +#define __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__
> +
> +/*
> + * Ensure that types and macros match across rt and non-rt variants,
> + * as this code is shared for both.
> + */
> +static_assert(__same_type(xfs_agblock_t, xfs_rgblock_t));
> +static_assert(NULLAGBLOCK == NULLRGBLOCK);
> +
> +/*
> + * Confirming reference counts via reverse mappings.
> + *
> + * These helpers are shared by the AG (refcount.c) and realtime
> + * (rtrefcount.c) refcount scrubbers. Both the rmap and refcount incore
> + * records use xfs_agblock_t for their start block regardless of whether the
> + * data lives in an allocation group or a realtime group, so the fragment
> + * bookkeeping here uses xfs_agblock_t for group-relative block numbers.
> + */
> +struct xchk_refcnt_frag {
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct xfs_rmap_irec rm;
> +};
> +
> +struct xchk_refcnt_check {
> + struct xfs_scrub *sc;
> + struct list_head fragments;
> +
> + /* refcount extent we're examining */
> + xfs_agblock_t bno;
> + xfs_extlen_t len;
> + xfs_nlink_t refcount;
> +
> + /* number of owners seen */
> + xfs_nlink_t seen;
> +};
> +
> +int xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec, void *priv);
> +void xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(struct xchk_refcnt_check *refchk);
> +int xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec, void *priv);
> +
> +/*
> + * Compare two refcount records so that both the AG (refcount_repair.c) and
> + * realtime (rtrefcount_repair.c) rebuilders sort staged records into the same
> + * order as the ondisk records.
> + */
> +int xrep_refc_extent_cmp(const void *a, const void *b);
> +
> +#endif /* __XFS_SCRUB_REFCOUNT_H__ */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
> index ca9c382005ff..72de263117a7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/refcount_repair.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include "scrub/newbt.h"
> #include "scrub/reap.h"
> #include "scrub/rcbag.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>
> /*
> * Rebuilding the Reference Count Btree
> @@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ xrep_refc_encode_startblock(
> }
>
> /* Sort in the same order as the ondisk records. */
> -static int
> +int
> xrep_refc_extent_cmp(
> const void *a,
> const void *b)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
> index 460e3f094adf..b78784051308 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include "scrub/common.h"
> #include "scrub/btree.h"
> #include "scrub/repair.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>
> /* Set us up with the realtime refcount metadata locked. */
> int
> @@ -59,248 +60,13 @@ xchk_setup_rtrefcountbt(
>
> /* Realtime Reference count btree scrubber. */
>
> -/*
> - * Confirming Reference Counts via Reverse Mappings
> - *
> - * We want to count the reverse mappings overlapping a refcount record
> - * (bno, len, refcount), allowing for the possibility that some of the
> - * overlap may come from smaller adjoining reverse mappings, while some
> - * comes from single extents which overlap the range entirely. The
> - * outer loop is as follows:
> - *
> - * 1. For all reverse mappings overlapping the refcount extent,
> - * a. If a given rmap completely overlaps, mark it as seen.
> - * b. Otherwise, record the fragment (in agbno order) for later
> - * processing.
> - *
> - * Once we've seen all the rmaps, we know that for all blocks in the
> - * refcount record we want to find $refcount owners and we've already
> - * visited $seen extents that overlap all the blocks. Therefore, we
> - * need to find ($refcount - $seen) owners for every block in the
> - * extent; call that quantity $target_nr. Proceed as follows:
> - *
> - * 2. Pull the first $target_nr fragments from the list; all of them
> - * should start at or before the start of the extent.
> - * Call this subset of fragments the working set.
> - * 3. Until there are no more unprocessed fragments,
> - * a. Find the shortest fragments in the set and remove them.
> - * b. Note the block number of the end of these fragments.
> - * c. Pull the same number of fragments from the list. All of these
> - * fragments should start at the block number recorded in the
> - * previous step.
> - * d. Put those fragments in the set.
> - * 4. Check that there are $target_nr fragments remaining in the list,
> - * and that they all end at or beyond the end of the refcount extent.
> - *
> - * If the refcount is correct, all the check conditions in the algorithm
> - * should always hold true. If not, the refcount is incorrect.
> - */
> -struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag {
> - struct list_head list;
> - struct xfs_rmap_irec rm;
> -};
> -
> -struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check {
> - struct xfs_scrub *sc;
> - struct list_head fragments;
> -
> - /* refcount extent we're examining */
> - xfs_rgblock_t bno;
> - xfs_extlen_t len;
> - xfs_nlink_t refcount;
> -
> - /* number of owners seen */
> - xfs_nlink_t seen;
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * Decide if the given rmap is large enough that we can redeem it
> - * towards refcount verification now, or if it's a fragment, in
> - * which case we'll hang onto it in the hopes that we'll later
> - * discover that we've collected exactly the correct number of
> - * fragments as the rtrefcountbt says we should have.
> - */
> -STATIC int
> -xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check(
> - struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> - const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
> - void *priv)
> -{
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check *refchk = priv;
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *frag;
> - xfs_rgblock_t rm_last;
> - xfs_rgblock_t rc_last;
> - int error = 0;
> -
> - if (xchk_should_terminate(refchk->sc, &error))
> - return error;
> -
> - rm_last = rec->rm_startblock + rec->rm_blockcount - 1;
> - rc_last = refchk->bno + refchk->len - 1;
> -
> - /* Confirm that a single-owner refc extent is a CoW stage. */
> - if (refchk->refcount == 1 && rec->rm_owner != XFS_RMAP_OWN_COW) {
> - xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(refchk->sc, cur, 0);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - if (rec->rm_startblock <= refchk->bno && rm_last >= rc_last) {
> - /*
> - * The rmap overlaps the refcount record, so we can confirm
> - * one refcount owner seen.
> - */
> - refchk->seen++;
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * This rmap covers only part of the refcount record, so
> - * save the fragment for later processing. If the rmapbt
> - * is healthy each rmap_irec we see will be in agbno order
> - * so we don't need insertion sort here.
> - */
> - frag = kmalloc_obj(struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag, XCHK_GFP_FLAGS);
> - if (!frag)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - memcpy(&frag->rm, rec, sizeof(frag->rm));
> - list_add_tail(&frag->list, &refchk->fragments);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Given a bunch of rmap fragments, iterate through them, keeping
> - * a running tally of the refcount. If this ever deviates from
> - * what we expect (which is the rtrefcountbt's refcount minus the
> - * number of extents that totally covered the rtrefcountbt extent),
> - * we have a rtrefcountbt error.
> - */
> -STATIC void
> -xchk_rtrefcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check *refchk)
> -{
> - struct list_head worklist;
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *frag;
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *n;
> - xfs_rgblock_t bno;
> - xfs_rgblock_t rbno;
> - xfs_rgblock_t next_rbno;
> - xfs_nlink_t nr;
> - xfs_nlink_t target_nr;
> -
> - target_nr = refchk->refcount - refchk->seen;
> - if (target_nr == 0)
> - return;
> -
> - /*
> - * There are (refchk->rc.rc_refcount - refchk->nr refcount)
> - * references we haven't found yet. Pull that many off the
> - * fragment list and figure out where the smallest rmap ends
> - * (and therefore the next rmap should start). All the rmaps
> - * we pull off should start at or before the beginning of the
> - * refcount record's range.
> - */
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&worklist);
> - rbno = NULLRGBLOCK;
> -
> - /* Make sure the fragments actually /are/ in bno order. */
> - bno = 0;
> - list_for_each_entry(frag, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> - if (frag->rm.rm_startblock < bno)
> - goto done;
> - bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Find all the rmaps that start at or before the refc extent,
> - * and put them on the worklist.
> - */
> - nr = 0;
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> - if (frag->rm.rm_startblock > refchk->bno || nr > target_nr)
> - break;
> - bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
> - if (bno < rbno)
> - rbno = bno;
> - list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
> - nr++;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * We should have found exactly $target_nr rmap fragments starting
> - * at or before the refcount extent.
> - */
> - if (nr != target_nr)
> - goto done;
> -
> - while (!list_empty(&refchk->fragments)) {
> - /* Discard any fragments ending at rbno from the worklist. */
> - nr = 0;
> - next_rbno = NULLRGBLOCK;
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &worklist, list) {
> - bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
> - if (bno != rbno) {
> - if (bno < next_rbno)
> - next_rbno = bno;
> - continue;
> - }
> - list_del(&frag->list);
> - kfree(frag);
> - nr++;
> - }
> -
> - /* Try to add nr rmaps starting at rbno to the worklist. */
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> - bno = frag->rm.rm_startblock + frag->rm.rm_blockcount;
> - if (frag->rm.rm_startblock != rbno)
> - goto done;
> - list_move_tail(&frag->list, &worklist);
> - if (next_rbno > bno)
> - next_rbno = bno;
> - nr--;
> - if (nr == 0)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * If we get here and nr > 0, this means that we added fewer
> - * items to the worklist than we discarded because the fragment
> - * list ran out of items. Therefore, we cannot maintain the
> - * required refcount. Something is wrong, so we're done.
> - */
> - if (nr)
> - goto done;
> -
> - rbno = next_rbno;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Make sure the last extent we processed ends at or beyond
> - * the end of the refcount extent.
> - */
> - if (rbno < refchk->bno + refchk->len)
> - goto done;
> -
> - /* Actually record us having seen the remaining refcount. */
> - refchk->seen = refchk->refcount;
> -done:
> - /* Delete fragments and work list. */
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &worklist, list) {
> - list_del(&frag->list);
> - kfree(frag);
> - }
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(frag, n, &refchk->fragments, list) {
> - list_del(&frag->list);
> - kfree(frag);
> - }
> -}
> -
> /* Use the rmap entries covering this extent to verify the refcount. */
> STATIC void
> xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
> struct xfs_scrub *sc,
> const struct xfs_refcount_irec *irec)
> {
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_check refchk = {
> + struct xchk_refcnt_check refchk = {
> .sc = sc,
> .bno = irec->rc_startblock,
> .len = irec->rc_blockcount,
> @@ -309,8 +75,8 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
> };
> struct xfs_rmap_irec low;
> struct xfs_rmap_irec high;
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *frag;
> - struct xchk_rtrefcnt_frag *n;
> + struct xchk_refcnt_frag *frag;
> + struct xchk_refcnt_frag *n;
> int error;
>
> if (!sc->sr.rmap_cur || xchk_skip_xref(sc->sm))
> @@ -324,11 +90,11 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_rmap(
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&refchk.fragments);
> error = xfs_rmap_query_range(sc->sr.rmap_cur, &low, &high,
> - xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check, &refchk);
> + xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check, &refchk);
> if (!xchk_should_check_xref(sc, &error, &sc->sr.rmap_cur))
> goto out_free;
>
> - xchk_rtrefcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(&refchk);
> + xchk_refcountbt_process_rmap_fragments(&refchk);
> if (irec->rc_refcount != refchk.seen)
> xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sr.rmap_cur, 0);
>
> @@ -408,21 +174,6 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_check_mergeable(
> memcpy(&rrc->prev_rec, irec, sizeof(struct xfs_refcount_irec));
> }
>
> -STATIC int
> -xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check_gap(
> - struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> - const struct xfs_rmap_irec *rec,
> - void *priv)
> -{
> - xfs_rgblock_t *next_bno = priv;
> -
> - if (*next_bno != NULLRGBLOCK && rec->rm_startblock < *next_bno)
> - return -ECANCELED;
> -
> - *next_bno = rec->rm_startblock + rec->rm_blockcount;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Make sure that a gap in the reference count records does not correspond to
> * overlapping records (i.e. shared extents) in the reverse mappings.
> @@ -448,7 +199,7 @@ xchk_rtrefcountbt_xref_gaps(
> high.rm_startblock = bno - 1;
>
> error = xfs_rmap_query_range(sc->sr.rmap_cur, &low, &high,
> - xchk_rtrefcountbt_rmap_check_gap, &next_bno);
> + xchk_refcountbt_rmap_check_gap, &next_bno);
> if (error == -ECANCELED)
> xchk_btree_xref_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sr.rmap_cur, 0);
> else
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
> index c78a6d2990c5..5ca9959dfacc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/rtrefcount_repair.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> #include "scrub/newbt.h"
> #include "scrub/reap.h"
> #include "scrub/rcbag.h"
> +#include "scrub/refcount.h"
>
> /*
> * Rebuilding the Reference Count Btree
> @@ -266,42 +267,6 @@ xrep_rtrefc_walk_rmaps(
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline uint32_t
> -xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(
> - const struct xfs_refcount_irec *irec)
> -{
> - uint32_t start;
> -
> - start = irec->rc_startblock & ~XFS_REFC_COWFLAG;
> - if (irec->rc_domain == XFS_REFC_DOMAIN_COW)
> - start |= XFS_REFC_COWFLAG;
> -
> - return start;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Compare two refcount records. We want to sort in order of increasing block
> - * number.
> - */
> -static int
> -xrep_rtrefc_extent_cmp(
> - const void *a,
> - const void *b)
> -{
> - const struct xfs_refcount_irec *ap = a;
> - const struct xfs_refcount_irec *bp = b;
> - uint32_t sa, sb;
> -
> - sa = xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(ap);
> - sb = xrep_rtrefc_encode_startblock(bp);
> -
> - if (sa > sb)
> - return 1;
> - if (sa < sb)
> - return -1;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Sort the refcount extents by startblock or else the btree records will be in
> * the wrong order. Make sure the records do not overlap in physical space.
> @@ -316,7 +281,7 @@ xrep_rtrefc_sort_records(
> xfs_rgblock_t next_rgbno = 0;
> int error;
>
> - error = xfarray_sort(rr->refcount_records, xrep_rtrefc_extent_cmp,
> + error = xfarray_sort(rr->refcount_records, xrep_refc_extent_cmp,
> XFARRAY_SORT_KILLABLE);
> if (error)
> return error;
> --
> 2.55.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 21:08 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: more misc code deduplication Eric Sandeen
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: factor out xfs_dir2_sf_copy_entries helper Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 12:14 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: factor out xrep_reset_fork_to_extents helper for scrub/repair Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 13:07 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-05 14:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 19:11 ` [PATCH V2 " Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 20:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 20:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 21:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-06 8:32 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:25 ` [PATCH V3 " Eric Sandeen
2026-10-08 11:02 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-02 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: re-use refcount scrub/repair code for rtrefcount Eric Sandeen
2026-10-05 20:38 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-06 8:25 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-07 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2026-10-07 15:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-08 11:15 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-08 11:09 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-08 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfs: more misc code deduplication Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261005203831.GE2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox