Re: what's next for the linux kernel?

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>]

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:47:25PM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:

> The bootup sequence of Linux is pathetic. What an ungodly mess. The 
> FSTAB file needs to go and a smarter system needs to be developed. I 
> know this isn't entirely a kernel issue but it is somewhat related.
 
 depinit.  written by richard lightman.  easily located with google.

 on relatively inexpensive amd 2100 hardware, depinit results
 in a startup time to console login of 5 seconds, and x-windows
 in a further 3.


 this is probably as good a time as any to mention this:

 depinit on a 2.6 kernel has had to have a small script added which does
 a sleep 3; kill -HUP <itself> - i.e. "kill -HUP 1".

 if this is not done, then any child program that sends a signal to
 process 1 is NOT SEEN.

 richard believes the problem to be actually in the 2.6 kernel.

 whilst /sbin/init only catches one signal, depinit catches quite
 literally _all_ of them.

 i'm relaying this from memory, so some of the above may be inaccurate.


> I think development needs to be done to make the kernel cleaner and 
> smarter rather than just bigger and faster. 

 actually, on embedded systems the linux 2.6 kernel is bigger
 and slower, which has prompted a large number of embedded systems
 designers to stick with the [by now abandoned] 2.4 series.

> Marc Perkel
> Linux Visionary
  ^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
 wha-heeeeey !

 
 my main concern, btw, is that by the time linux kernel developers
 "receive hardware to play with", it's already too late.

 the hardware decisions have already been made.

 you - worthy as you are and the work you are doing is -
 are treated as second class citizens by the companies
 manufacturing hardware.

 time to put the horse before the cart.

 l.

-- 
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net">http://lkcl.net</a>
--