From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tilman@imap.cc
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:32:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091012.033246.56701176.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD2E8C8.4060205@imap.cc>
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:28:56 +0200
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [CCing PPP people]
>
> Am 11.10.2009 13:40 schrieb Johannes Berg:
>> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:18 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Can you explain a bit more what that message is about?
>>> I am encountering it in a completely different context
>>> (PPP over ISDN) [...]
>>
>> Basically, calling netif_rx() with softirqs enabled.
>
> AFAICS that would have to be the netif_rx() call in
> ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() [drivers/net/ppp_generic.c#L1791],
> called (via others) from the tasklet work function
> ppp_sync_process() [drivers/net/ppp_synctty.c#L545].
> Should that be changed to the
> "if (in_interrupt()) netif_rx(skb) else netif_rx_ni(skb)"
> stanza from the linux.kernel.wireless.general thread then?
The PPP receive paths in ppp_generic.c do a local_bh_disable()/
local_bh_enable() around packet receiving (via ppp_recv_lock()/
ppp_recv_unlock() in ppp_do_recv).
So at least that part is perfectly fine.
ppp_input(), as called from ppp_sync_process(), also disables BH's
around ppp_do_recv() calls (via read_lock_bh()/read_unlock_bh()).
So that's fine too.
Do you have a bug report or are you just scanning around looking
for trouble? :-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: tilman@imap.cc
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:32:46 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091012.033246.56701176.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD2E8C8.4060205@imap.cc>
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:28:56 +0200
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [CCing PPP people]
>
> Am 11.10.2009 13:40 schrieb Johannes Berg:
>> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:18 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Can you explain a bit more what that message is about?
>>> I am encountering it in a completely different context
>>> (PPP over ISDN) [...]
>>
>> Basically, calling netif_rx() with softirqs enabled.
>
> AFAICS that would have to be the netif_rx() call in
> ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() [drivers/net/ppp_generic.c#L1791],
> called (via others) from the tasklet work function
> ppp_sync_process() [drivers/net/ppp_synctty.c#L545].
> Should that be changed to the
> "if (in_interrupt()) netif_rx(skb) else netif_rx_ni(skb)"
> stanza from the linux.kernel.wireless.general thread then?
The PPP receive paths in ppp_generic.c do a local_bh_disable()/
local_bh_enable() around packet receiving (via ppp_recv_lock()/
ppp_recv_unlock() in ppp_do_recv).
So at least that part is perfectly fine.
ppp_input(), as called from ppp_sync_process(), also disables BH's
around ppp_do_recv() calls (via read_lock_bh()/read_unlock_bh()).
So that's fine too.
Do you have a bug report or are you just scanning around looking
for trouble? :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-11 9:52 NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Dave Young
2009-10-11 10:08 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:17 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-11 10:37 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:38 ` David Miller
2009-10-11 10:55 ` Dave Young
2009-10-11 11:18 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 11:40 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-12 8:28 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 8:28 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 10:32 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-10-12 10:32 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 11:25 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 11:25 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-15 11:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 11:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 18:46 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 18:46 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:19 ` [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:39 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:39 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 8:47 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26 8:47 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27 0:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27 0:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 11:29 ` David Miller
2009-10-22 11:29 ` David Miller
2009-10-22 12:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 23:37 ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-22 23:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 13:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 13:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:27 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:27 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 16:33 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 16:33 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 16:39 ` Joe Korty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-30 21:48 Dave Jones
2012-05-31 7:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-31 7:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-31 14:04 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 16:46 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-06-01 22:57 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-02 20:58 ` Marc Dionne
2012-06-05 23:15 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-06 1:46 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-06 5:42 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 2:34 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 7:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 14:23 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 14:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 20:27 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 20:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 21:53 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 22:33 ` Marc Dionne
2012-06-10 20:40 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-25 12:38 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2012-06-25 19:28 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-25 19:52 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 8:32 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-10-03 16:40 liran raz
2008-10-03 16:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-02 18:30 liran raz
2007-05-29 6:01 Rafał Bilski
2007-05-28 21:04 Rafał Bilski
2007-05-28 22:12 ` Anant Nitya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091012.033246.56701176.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tilman@imap.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.