All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:46:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD76184.6030900@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2202 bytes --]

On 15.10.2009 19:53 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 10/15/2009 01:40 PM:
> 
>> On 12-10-2009 13:25, Tilman Schmidt wrote:

>>> I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of
>>> the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether
>>> it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at
>>> all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin.
>>> In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with
>>> smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur.

I'm sorry, I had confused the two cases. The message occurs in
the smpppd+capidrv scenario, not with pppd+capiplugin.

>>> Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function.
>>> The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all.
>>> In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP
>>> line discipline that did.

This analysis was therefore wrong. It would be the netif_rx()
call towards the end of isdn_ppp_push_higher() in
drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c L1177.

>> Anyway, I agree with Michael Buesch there is no reason to waste time
>> for tracking all netif_rx vs netif_rx_ni uses, and it seems we could
>> avoid it by using the "proper" version of raise_softirq_irqoff() in
>> __napi_schedule(). Could anybody try if I'm not wrong?
>>
>>  net/core/dev.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index 28b0b9e..7fc4009 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -2728,7 +2728,7 @@ void __napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *n)
>>  
>>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>>  	list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data).poll_list);
>> -	__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
>> +	raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
>>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_schedule);

I have tested your patch and I can confirm that it fixes the messages.
I have not noticed any ill effects.

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:46:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AD76184.6030900@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2202 bytes --]

On 15.10.2009 19:53 Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 10/15/2009 01:40 PM:
> 
>> On 12-10-2009 13:25, Tilman Schmidt wrote:

>>> I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of
>>> the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether
>>> it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at
>>> all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin.
>>> In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with
>>> smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur.

I'm sorry, I had confused the two cases. The message occurs in
the smpppd+capidrv scenario, not with pppd+capiplugin.

>>> Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function.
>>> The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all.
>>> In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP
>>> line discipline that did.

This analysis was therefore wrong. It would be the netif_rx()
call towards the end of isdn_ppp_push_higher() in
drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c L1177.

>> Anyway, I agree with Michael Buesch there is no reason to waste time
>> for tracking all netif_rx vs netif_rx_ni uses, and it seems we could
>> avoid it by using the "proper" version of raise_softirq_irqoff() in
>> __napi_schedule(). Could anybody try if I'm not wrong?
>>
>>  net/core/dev.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index 28b0b9e..7fc4009 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -2728,7 +2728,7 @@ void __napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *n)
>>  
>>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>>  	list_add_tail(&n->poll_list, &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data).poll_list);
>> -	__raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
>> +	raise_softirq_irqoff(NET_RX_SOFTIRQ);
>>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__napi_schedule);

I have tested your patch and I can confirm that it fixes the messages.
I have not noticed any ill effects.

Thanks,
Tilman

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-21 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-11  9:52 NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Dave Young
2009-10-11 10:08 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:17   ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-11 10:37     ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:38     ` David Miller
2009-10-11 10:55   ` Dave Young
2009-10-11 11:18   ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 11:40     ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-12  8:28       ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12  8:28         ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 10:32         ` David Miller
2009-10-12 10:32           ` David Miller
2009-10-12 11:25           ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 11:25             ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-15 11:40         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 11:40           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 18:46             ` Tilman Schmidt [this message]
2009-10-21 18:46               ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:19               ` [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:19                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:25                 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:25                   ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:37                   ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:37                     ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:39                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:39                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22  8:27                     ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22  8:27                       ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:39                       ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:39                         ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:46                         ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:46                           ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26  7:41                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26  7:44                             ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26  7:44                               ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26  7:54                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26  7:58                                 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26  7:58                                   ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26  8:47                                   ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26  8:47                                     ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26  8:56                                     ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26  8:56                                       ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27  0:52                                       ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27  0:52                                         ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27  7:01                                         ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27  7:01                                           ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 11:29                     ` David Miller
2009-10-22 11:29                       ` David Miller
2009-10-22 12:54                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 23:37               ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-22 23:37                 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 13:34                 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 13:34                   ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:27                   ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:27                     ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:31                     ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:31                       ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 16:33                       ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 16:33                         ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 16:39 ` Joe Korty
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-30 21:48 Dave Jones
2012-05-31  7:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-31  7:56   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-31 14:04     ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 16:46       ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-06-01 22:57   ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-02 20:58     ` Marc Dionne
2012-06-05 23:15       ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-06  1:46         ` Dave Jones
2012-06-06  5:42           ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08  2:34             ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08  7:57               ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 14:23                 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 14:51                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 20:27                     ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 20:41                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 21:53                         ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 22:33                           ` Marc Dionne
2012-06-10 20:40                             ` Dave Jones
2012-06-25 12:38                           ` Johannes Stezenbach
2012-06-25 19:28                             ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-25 19:52                               ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08  8:32               ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-10-03 16:40 liran raz
2008-10-03 16:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-02 18:30 liran raz
2007-05-29  6:01 Rafał Bilski
2007-05-28 21:04 Rafał Bilski
2007-05-28 22:12 ` Anant Nitya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc \
    --to=tilman@imap.cc \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.