From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
isdn4linux <isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de>,
i4ldeveloper <i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:37:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE0ECCE.2020407@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1719 bytes --]
On 21.10.2009 20:46, /me wrote:
>>>> I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of
>>>> the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether
>>>> it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at
>>>> all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin.
>>>> In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with
>>>> smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur.
>
> I'm sorry, I had confused the two cases. The message occurs in
> the smpppd+capidrv scenario, not with pppd+capiplugin.
>
>>>> Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function.
>>>> The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all.
>>>> In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP
>>>> line discipline that did.
>
> This analysis was therefore wrong. It would be the netif_rx()
> call towards the end of isdn_ppp_push_higher() in
> drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c L1177.
Having noticed that, I cooked up the following patch which fixed
the messages for me. Comments? (Adding i4l people to the already
impressive CC list.)
--- a/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c
@@ -1174,7 +1174,10 @@ isdn_ppp_push_higher(isdn_net_dev * net_dev, isdn_net_local * lp, struct sk_buff
#endif /* CONFIG_IPPP_FILTER */
skb->dev = dev;
skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ netif_rx(skb);
+ else
+ netif_rx_ni(skb);
/* net_dev->local->stats.rx_packets++; done in isdn_net.c */
return;
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, hidave.darkstar@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
isdn4linux <isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de>,
i4ldeveloper <i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de>,
Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:37:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE0ECCE.2020407@imap.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1719 bytes --]
On 21.10.2009 20:46, /me wrote:
>>>> I have encountered the message in the subject during a test of
>>>> the Gigaset CAPI driver, and would like to determine whether
>>>> it's a bug in the driver, a bug somewhere else, or no bug at
>>>> all. The test scenario was PPP over ISDN with pppd+capiplugin.
>>>> In an alternative scenario, also PPP over ISDN but with
>>>> smpppd+capidrv, the message did not occur.
>
> I'm sorry, I had confused the two cases. The message occurs in
> the smpppd+capidrv scenario, not with pppd+capiplugin.
>
>>>> Johannes' answer pointed me to the netif_rx() function.
>>>> The Gigaset driver itself doesn't call that function at all.
>>>> In the scenario where I saw the message, it was the SYNC_PPP
>>>> line discipline that did.
>
> This analysis was therefore wrong. It would be the netif_rx()
> call towards the end of isdn_ppp_push_higher() in
> drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c L1177.
Having noticed that, I cooked up the following patch which fixed
the messages for me. Comments? (Adding i4l people to the already
impressive CC list.)
--- a/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c
@@ -1174,7 +1174,10 @@ isdn_ppp_push_higher(isdn_net_dev * net_dev, isdn_net_local * lp, struct sk_buff
#endif /* CONFIG_IPPP_FILTER */
skb->dev = dev;
skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
- netif_rx(skb);
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ netif_rx(skb);
+ else
+ netif_rx_ni(skb);
/* net_dev->local->stats.rx_packets++; done in isdn_net.c */
return;
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 254 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-11 9:52 NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Dave Young
2009-10-11 10:08 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:17 ` Michael Buesch
2009-10-11 10:37 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-11 10:38 ` David Miller
2009-10-11 10:55 ` Dave Young
2009-10-11 11:18 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 11:40 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-12 8:28 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 8:28 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 10:32 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 10:32 ` David Miller
2009-10-12 11:25 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-12 11:25 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-15 11:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 11:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-15 17:53 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 18:46 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 18:46 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:19 ` [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:25 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-21 21:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-21 21:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-21 21:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 8:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:39 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:39 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 7:58 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 8:47 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26 8:47 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-26 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-26 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27 0:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27 0:52 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-27 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-27 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-22 11:29 ` David Miller
2009-10-22 11:29 ` David Miller
2009-10-22 12:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-22 23:37 ` Tilman Schmidt [this message]
2009-10-22 23:37 ` NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 13:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 13:34 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:27 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:27 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2009-10-23 16:33 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-23 16:33 ` Tilman Schmidt
2009-10-11 16:39 ` Joe Korty
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-30 21:48 Dave Jones
2012-05-31 7:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-31 7:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-31 14:04 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 16:46 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2012-06-01 22:57 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-02 20:58 ` Marc Dionne
2012-06-05 23:15 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-06 1:46 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-06 5:42 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 2:34 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 7:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 14:23 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 14:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 20:27 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 20:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-08 21:53 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-08 22:33 ` Marc Dionne
2012-06-10 20:40 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-25 12:38 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2012-06-25 19:28 ` Francois Romieu
2012-06-25 19:52 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 8:32 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2008-10-03 16:40 liran raz
2008-10-03 16:55 ` Scott Wood
2008-10-02 18:30 liran raz
2007-05-29 6:01 Rafał Bilski
2007-05-28 21:04 Rafał Bilski
2007-05-28 22:12 ` Anant Nitya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AE0ECCE.2020407@imap.cc \
--to=tilman@imap.cc \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=isdn@linux-pingi.de \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.