From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:05:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925070517.GK13234@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348224383-1499-6-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Hi Mel,
I have a question below.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:19AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Compactions migrate scanner acquires the zone->lru_lock when scanning a range
> of pages looking for LRU pages to acquire. It does this even if there are
> no LRU pages in the range. If multiple processes are compacting then this
> can cause severe locking contention. To make matters worse commit b2eef8c0
> (mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages
> for migration) releases the lru_lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages that are
> scanned.
>
> This patch makes two changes to how the migrate scanner acquires the LRU
> lock. First, it only releases the LRU lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages if
> the lock is contended. This reduces the number of times it unnecessarily
> disables and re-enables IRQs. The second is that it defers acquiring the
> LRU lock for as long as possible. If there are no LRU pages or the only
> LRU pages are transhuge then the LRU lock will not be acquired at all
> which reduces contention on zone->lru_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 6b55491..a6068ff 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> return is_migrate_cma(migratetype) || migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
> }
>
> +static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
> * very heavily contended. Check if the process needs to be scheduled or
> @@ -62,7 +67,7 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> {
> - if (need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock)) {
> + if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
> if (locked) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> locked = false;
> @@ -327,7 +332,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> isolate_mode_t mode = 0;
> struct lruvec *lruvec;
> unsigned long flags;
> - bool locked;
> + bool locked = false;
>
> /*
> * Ensure that there are not too many pages isolated from the LRU
> @@ -347,23 +352,17 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>
> /* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
> cond_resched();
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = true;
> for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
> struct page *page;
>
> /* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
> - if (!((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = false;
> + if (locked && !((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> + if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + locked = false;
> + }
> }
>
> - /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> - locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> - locked, cc);
> - if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> - break;
> -
> /*
> * migrate_pfn does not necessarily start aligned to a
> * pageblock. Ensure that pfn_valid is called when moving
> @@ -403,21 +402,38 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> pageblock_nr = low_pfn >> pageblock_order;
> if (!cc->sync && last_pageblock_nr != pageblock_nr &&
> !migrate_async_suitable(get_pageblock_migratetype(page))) {
> - low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> - low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> - last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> - continue;
> + goto next_pageblock;
> }
>
> + /* Check may be lockless but that's ok as we recheck later */
> if (!PageLRU(page))
> continue;
>
> /*
> - * PageLRU is set, and lru_lock excludes isolation,
> - * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already
> - * happened if PageLRU is set).
> + * PageLRU is set. lru_lock normally excludes isolation
> + * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
> + * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
> + * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> + * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> + * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> */
> if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> + if (!locked)
> + goto next_pageblock;
Why skip all pages in a pageblock if !locked?
Shouldn't we add some comment?
> + low_pfn += (1 << compound_order(page)) - 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> + locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> + locked, cc);
> + if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + break;
> +
> + /* Recheck PageLRU and PageTransHuge under lock */
> + if (!PageLRU(page))
> + continue;
> + if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> low_pfn += (1 << compound_order(page)) - 1;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -444,6 +460,13 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> ++low_pfn;
> break;
> }
> +
> + continue;
> +
> +next_pageblock:
> + low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> + low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> + last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> }
>
> acct_isolated(zone, locked, cc);
> --
> 1.7.9.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:05:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925070517.GK13234@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348224383-1499-6-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Hi Mel,
I have a question below.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:19AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Compactions migrate scanner acquires the zone->lru_lock when scanning a range
> of pages looking for LRU pages to acquire. It does this even if there are
> no LRU pages in the range. If multiple processes are compacting then this
> can cause severe locking contention. To make matters worse commit b2eef8c0
> (mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages
> for migration) releases the lru_lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages that are
> scanned.
>
> This patch makes two changes to how the migrate scanner acquires the LRU
> lock. First, it only releases the LRU lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages if
> the lock is contended. This reduces the number of times it unnecessarily
> disables and re-enables IRQs. The second is that it defers acquiring the
> LRU lock for as long as possible. If there are no LRU pages or the only
> LRU pages are transhuge then the LRU lock will not be acquired at all
> which reduces contention on zone->lru_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 6b55491..a6068ff 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> return is_migrate_cma(migratetype) || migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
> }
>
> +static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
> * very heavily contended. Check if the process needs to be scheduled or
> @@ -62,7 +67,7 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> {
> - if (need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock)) {
> + if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
> if (locked) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> locked = false;
> @@ -327,7 +332,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> isolate_mode_t mode = 0;
> struct lruvec *lruvec;
> unsigned long flags;
> - bool locked;
> + bool locked = false;
>
> /*
> * Ensure that there are not too many pages isolated from the LRU
> @@ -347,23 +352,17 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>
> /* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
> cond_resched();
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = true;
> for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
> struct page *page;
>
> /* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
> - if (!((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = false;
> + if (locked && !((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> + if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + locked = false;
> + }
> }
>
> - /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> - locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> - locked, cc);
> - if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> - break;
> -
> /*
> * migrate_pfn does not necessarily start aligned to a
> * pageblock. Ensure that pfn_valid is called when moving
> @@ -403,21 +402,38 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> pageblock_nr = low_pfn >> pageblock_order;
> if (!cc->sync && last_pageblock_nr != pageblock_nr &&
> !migrate_async_suitable(get_pageblock_migratetype(page))) {
> - low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> - low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> - last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> - continue;
> + goto next_pageblock;
> }
>
> + /* Check may be lockless but that's ok as we recheck later */
> if (!PageLRU(page))
> continue;
>
> /*
> - * PageLRU is set, and lru_lock excludes isolation,
> - * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already
> - * happened if PageLRU is set).
> + * PageLRU is set. lru_lock normally excludes isolation
> + * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
> + * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
> + * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> + * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> + * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> */
> if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> + if (!locked)
> + goto next_pageblock;
Why skip all pages in a pageblock if !locked?
Shouldn't we add some comment?
> + low_pfn += (1 << compound_order(page)) - 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> + locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> + locked, cc);
> + if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + break;
> +
> + /* Recheck PageLRU and PageTransHuge under lock */
> + if (!PageLRU(page))
> + continue;
> + if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> low_pfn += (1 << compound_order(page)) - 1;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -444,6 +460,13 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> ++low_pfn;
> break;
> }
> +
> + continue;
> +
> +next_pageblock:
> + low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> + low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> + last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> }
>
> acct_isolated(zone, locked, cc);
> --
> 1.7.9.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:05:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925070517.GK13234@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348224383-1499-6-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Hi Mel,
I have a question below.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:46:19AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Compactions migrate scanner acquires the zone->lru_lock when scanning a range
> of pages looking for LRU pages to acquire. It does this even if there are
> no LRU pages in the range. If multiple processes are compacting then this
> can cause severe locking contention. To make matters worse commit b2eef8c0
> (mm: compaction: minimise the time IRQs are disabled while isolating pages
> for migration) releases the lru_lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages that are
> scanned.
>
> This patch makes two changes to how the migrate scanner acquires the LRU
> lock. First, it only releases the LRU lock every SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages if
> the lock is contended. This reduces the number of times it unnecessarily
> disables and re-enables IRQs. The second is that it defers acquiring the
> LRU lock for as long as possible. If there are no LRU pages or the only
> LRU pages are transhuge then the LRU lock will not be acquired at all
> which reduces contention on zone->lru_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 6b55491..a6068ff 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> return is_migrate_cma(migratetype) || migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE;
> }
>
> +static inline bool should_release_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + return need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Compaction requires the taking of some coarse locks that are potentially
> * very heavily contended. Check if the process needs to be scheduled or
> @@ -62,7 +67,7 @@ static inline bool migrate_async_suitable(int migratetype)
> static bool compact_checklock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags,
> bool locked, struct compact_control *cc)
> {
> - if (need_resched() || spin_is_contended(lock)) {
> + if (should_release_lock(lock)) {
> if (locked) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
> locked = false;
> @@ -327,7 +332,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> isolate_mode_t mode = 0;
> struct lruvec *lruvec;
> unsigned long flags;
> - bool locked;
> + bool locked = false;
>
> /*
> * Ensure that there are not too many pages isolated from the LRU
> @@ -347,23 +352,17 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>
> /* Time to isolate some pages for migration */
> cond_resched();
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = true;
> for (; low_pfn < end_pfn; low_pfn++) {
> struct page *page;
>
> /* give a chance to irqs before checking need_resched() */
> - if (!((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> - locked = false;
> + if (locked && !((low_pfn+1) % SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)) {
> + if (should_release_lock(&zone->lru_lock)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
> + locked = false;
> + }
> }
>
> - /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> - locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> - locked, cc);
> - if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> - break;
> -
> /*
> * migrate_pfn does not necessarily start aligned to a
> * pageblock. Ensure that pfn_valid is called when moving
> @@ -403,21 +402,38 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> pageblock_nr = low_pfn >> pageblock_order;
> if (!cc->sync && last_pageblock_nr != pageblock_nr &&
> !migrate_async_suitable(get_pageblock_migratetype(page))) {
> - low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> - low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> - last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> - continue;
> + goto next_pageblock;
> }
>
> + /* Check may be lockless but that's ok as we recheck later */
> if (!PageLRU(page))
> continue;
>
> /*
> - * PageLRU is set, and lru_lock excludes isolation,
> - * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already
> - * happened if PageLRU is set).
> + * PageLRU is set. lru_lock normally excludes isolation
> + * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
> + * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
> + * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> + * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> + * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> */
> if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> + if (!locked)
> + goto next_pageblock;
Why skip all pages in a pageblock if !locked?
Shouldn't we add some comment?
> + low_pfn += (1 << compound_order(page)) - 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check if it is ok to still hold the lock */
> + locked = compact_checklock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, &flags,
> + locked, cc);
> + if (!locked || fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + break;
> +
> + /* Recheck PageLRU and PageTransHuge under lock */
> + if (!PageLRU(page))
> + continue;
> + if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
> low_pfn += (1 << compound_order(page)) - 1;
> continue;
> }
> @@ -444,6 +460,13 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> ++low_pfn;
> break;
> }
> +
> + continue;
> +
> +next_pageblock:
> + low_pfn += pageblock_nr_pages;
> + low_pfn = ALIGN(low_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages) - 1;
> + last_pageblock_nr = pageblock_nr;
> }
>
> acct_isolated(zone, locked, cc);
> --
> 1.7.9.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 10:46 [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] Revert "mm: compaction: check lock contention first before taking lock" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:46 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:46 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] Revert "mm-compaction-abort-compaction-loop-if-lock-is-contended-or-run-too-long-fix" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:47 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:47 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] Revert "mm: compaction: abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:48 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:48 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: compaction: Abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:50 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:50 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:50 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 7:34 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:34 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:51 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:51 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25 7:05 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-09-25 7:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:05 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:51 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 7:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 7:51 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 8:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 21:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-26 0:23 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 0:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 0:23 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 10:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lock " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 8:52 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 8:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 8:52 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 7:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] Revert "mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25 7:37 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:37 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:53 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:53 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:53 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 9:39 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 9:39 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 9:39 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 21:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 20:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-27 12:06 ` [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated -fix2 Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:06 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:06 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 0:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 0:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 0:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-27 12:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: compaction: Restart compaction from near where it left off Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:54 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:54 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 13:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Rik van Riel
2012-09-21 13:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Rik van Riel
2012-09-21 13:51 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120925070517.GK13234@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard@arachsys.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.