All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:39:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925143931.f404ca22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925081327.GA7759@bbox>

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:13:27 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:

> I see. To me, your saying is better than current comment.
> I hope comment could be more explicit.
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index df01b4e..f1d2cc7 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -542,8 +542,9 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>                  * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
>                  * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
>                  * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> -                * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> -                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> +                * Check transhuge without lock and *skip* if it's either a
> +                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because it's not safe to call
> +                * compound_order.
>                  */
>                 if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
>                         if (!locked)

Going a bit further:

--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-acquire-the-zone-lru_lock-as-late-as-possible-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *
 		 * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
 		 * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
 		 * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
-		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
+		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because calling compound_order()
+		 * requires lru_lock to exclude isolation and splitting.
 		 */
 		if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
 			if (!locked)
_


but...  the requirement to hold lru_lock for compound_order() is news
to me.  It doesn't seem to be written down or explained anywhere, and
one wonders why the cheerily undocumented compound_lock() doesn't have
this effect.  What's going on here??

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:39:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925143931.f404ca22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925081327.GA7759@bbox>

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:13:27 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:

> I see. To me, your saying is better than current comment.
> I hope comment could be more explicit.
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index df01b4e..f1d2cc7 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -542,8 +542,9 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>                  * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
>                  * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
>                  * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> -                * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> -                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> +                * Check transhuge without lock and *skip* if it's either a
> +                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because it's not safe to call
> +                * compound_order.
>                  */
>                 if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
>                         if (!locked)

Going a bit further:

--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-acquire-the-zone-lru_lock-as-late-as-possible-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *
 		 * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
 		 * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
 		 * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
-		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
+		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because calling compound_order()
+		 * requires lru_lock to exclude isolation and splitting.
 		 */
 		if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
 			if (!locked)
_


but...  the requirement to hold lru_lock for compound_order() is news
to me.  It doesn't seem to be written down or explained anywhere, and
one wonders why the cheerily undocumented compound_lock() doesn't have
this effect.  What's going on here??


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:39:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120925143931.f404ca22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120925081327.GA7759@bbox>

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:13:27 +0900
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:

> I see. To me, your saying is better than current comment.
> I hope comment could be more explicit.
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index df01b4e..f1d2cc7 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -542,8 +542,9 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
>                  * splitting and collapsing (collapsing has already happened
>                  * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
>                  * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
> -                * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
> -                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
> +                * Check transhuge without lock and *skip* if it's either a
> +                * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because it's not safe to call
> +                * compound_order.
>                  */
>                 if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
>                         if (!locked)

Going a bit further:

--- a/mm/compaction.c~mm-compaction-acquire-the-zone-lru_lock-as-late-as-possible-fix
+++ a/mm/compaction.c
@@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ isolate_migratepages_range(struct zone *
 		 * if PageLRU is set) but the lock is not necessarily taken
 		 * here and it is wasteful to take it just to check transhuge.
 		 * Check transhuge without lock and skip if it's either a
-		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page.
+		 * transhuge or hugetlbfs page because calling compound_order()
+		 * requires lru_lock to exclude isolation and splitting.
 		 */
 		if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
 			if (!locked)
_


but...  the requirement to hold lru_lock for compound_order() is news
to me.  It doesn't seem to be written down or explained anywhere, and
one wonders why the cheerily undocumented compound_lock() doesn't have
this effect.  What's going on here??

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-25 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-21 10:46 [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] Revert "mm: compaction: check lock contention first before taking lock" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:46   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:46     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:46     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] Revert "mm-compaction-abort-compaction-loop-if-lock-is-contended-or-run-too-long-fix" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:47   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:47     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:47     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] Revert "mm: compaction: abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:48   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:48     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:48     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: compaction: Abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:50   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:50     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:50     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:31   ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:31     ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:31     ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25  7:34   ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:34     ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:34     ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:51   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:51     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:51     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25  7:05   ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:05     ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:05     ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:51     ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25  7:51       ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-25  7:51       ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25  8:13       ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  8:13         ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  8:13         ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 21:39         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-09-25 21:39           ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 21:39           ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-26  0:23           ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26  0:23             ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-26  0:23             ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 10:17           ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 10:17             ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 10:17             ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lock " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:35   ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:35     ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:35     ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24  8:52     ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24  8:52       ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-24  8:52       ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25  7:36       ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:36         ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:36         ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:35   ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:35     ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:35     ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] Revert "mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:52     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25  7:37   ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:37     ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-25  7:37     ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:53   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:53     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:53     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:36   ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:36     ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-21 21:36     ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24  9:39     ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24  9:39       ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-24  9:39       ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 21:26       ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 21:26         ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 21:26         ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25  9:12         ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25  9:12           ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-25  9:12           ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 20:03           ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 20:03             ` [Qemu-devel] " Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 20:03             ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-27 12:06             ` [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated -fix2 Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:06               ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:06               ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12             ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12               ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12               ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-26  0:49           ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26  0:49             ` [Qemu-devel] " Minchan Kim
2012-09-26  0:49             ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-27 12:14             ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:14               ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 12:14               ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: compaction: Restart compaction from near where it left off Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46   ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:54   ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:54     ` [Qemu-devel] " Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 17:54     ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 13:51 ` [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Rik van Riel
2012-09-21 13:51   ` [Qemu-devel] " Rik van Riel
2012-09-21 13:51   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120925143931.f404ca22.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard@arachsys.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.