From: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Preeti U Murthy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:49:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53830707.5020001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtC_vXvf6gUtbrunn+-Zzk8-11AyKF3asjdH5=pejL69Lg@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/26/2014 01:55 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 25 May 2014 15:22, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> Why do we have two interfaces arch_scale_freq_power() and
>> arch_scale_cpu_power()? Does it make sense to consolidate them now ?
> Hi Preeti,
>
> They don't have the same purpose. arch_scale_cpu_power set the max
> capacity of your CPU whereas arch_scale_freq_power can be used to give
> the current capacity. ARM platform were using arch_scale_freq_power
> because it was the only one available for non SMT system but this
> induces some misunderstanding and some limitation in the
> characterization of a CPUs. This consolidation is a necessary step so
> we can now have the max capacity of a CPU and let
> arch_scale_freq_power for other purpose (or even remove it if
> useless).
Ah ok! Thanks :) This was insightful :)
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
>
> Regards,
> Vincent
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Preeti U Murthy
>>
>>
>> On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> Use the new arch_scale_cpu_power in order to reflect the original capacity of
>>> a CPU instead of arch_scale_freq_power which is more linked to a scaling of
>>> the capacity linked to the frequency.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>> index 71e1fec..6cc25a8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>>> */
>>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale);
>>>
>>> -unsigned long arch_scale_freq_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>>> +unsigned long arch_scale_cpu_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>>> {
>>> return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);
>>> }
>>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpu)
>>> set_power_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity);
>>>
>>> printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: update cpu_power %lu\n",
>>> - cpu, arch_scale_freq_power(NULL, cpu));
>>> + cpu, arch_scale_cpu_power(NULL, cpu));
>>> }
>>>
>>> #else
>>>
>>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:49:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53830707.5020001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtC_vXvf6gUtbrunn+-Zzk8-11AyKF3asjdH5=pejL69Lg@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/26/2014 01:55 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 25 May 2014 15:22, Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> Why do we have two interfaces arch_scale_freq_power() and
>> arch_scale_cpu_power()? Does it make sense to consolidate them now ?
> Hi Preeti,
>
> They don't have the same purpose. arch_scale_cpu_power set the max
> capacity of your CPU whereas arch_scale_freq_power can be used to give
> the current capacity. ARM platform were using arch_scale_freq_power
> because it was the only one available for non SMT system but this
> induces some misunderstanding and some limitation in the
> characterization of a CPUs. This consolidation is a necessary step so
> we can now have the max capacity of a CPU and let
> arch_scale_freq_power for other purpose (or even remove it if
> useless).
Ah ok! Thanks :) This was insightful :)
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
>
> Regards,
> Vincent
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Preeti U Murthy
>>
>>
>> On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> Use the new arch_scale_cpu_power in order to reflect the original capacity of
>>> a CPU instead of arch_scale_freq_power which is more linked to a scaling of
>>> the capacity linked to the frequency.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>> index 71e1fec..6cc25a8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
>>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>>> */
>>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale);
>>>
>>> -unsigned long arch_scale_freq_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>>> +unsigned long arch_scale_cpu_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
>>> {
>>> return per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu);
>>> }
>>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void update_cpu_power(unsigned int cpu)
>>> set_power_scale(cpu, cpu_capacity(cpu) / middle_capacity);
>>>
>>> printk(KERN_INFO "CPU%u: update cpu_power %lu\n",
>>> - cpu, arch_scale_freq_power(NULL, cpu));
>>> + cpu, arch_scale_cpu_power(NULL, cpu));
>>> }
>>>
>>> #else
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 216+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-23 15:52 [PATCH v2 00/11] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] sched: fix imbalance flag reset Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-25 10:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-25 10:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 7:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 7:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 9:16 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 9:16 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 10:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 10:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] sched: remove a wake_affine condition Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 15:19 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 6:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 6:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-28 15:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-28 15:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 15:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 15:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] sched: fix avg_load computation Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] sched: Allow all archs to set the power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 14:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 14:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 20:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 20:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 9:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-04 9:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-04 11:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-05 8:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-05 8:59 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-16 9:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-16 9:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 13:22 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 13:22 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 14:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 14:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:17 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 11:17 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-06 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-06 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ARM: topology: use new cpu_power interface Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-25 13:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-25 13:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 8:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 8:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 9:19 ` Preeti U Murthy [this message]
2014-05-26 9:19 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] sched: add per rq cpu_power_orig Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] Revert "sched: Put rq's sched_avg under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED" Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] sched: get CPU's activity statistic Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-27 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 12:10 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 12:10 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 13:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 13:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 15:47 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 15:47 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 16:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 16:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 12:03 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 12:03 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:41 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 17:41 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:20 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 17:20 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 7:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 7:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 8:55 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 8:55 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 9:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 9:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 10:25 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:25 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:44 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:44 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 9:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 9:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 10:00 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:00 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 10:36 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:36 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-04 11:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:23 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 11:23 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 11:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 11:52 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-04 13:09 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 13:09 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 13:23 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-04 13:23 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-05-28 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:16 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 17:16 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-06-03 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 23:11 ` Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 23:11 ` Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 9:50 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 9:50 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 19:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 19:20 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-01 11:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-01 11:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-02 14:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 14:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] sched: test the cpu's capacity in wake affine Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-28 11:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-28 11:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 0:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 0:34 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-11-24 13:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-11-24 13:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 19:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 6:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 20:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 20:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 17:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 17:06 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 12:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 12:31 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 19:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 13:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 13:26 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 19:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 19:24 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 19:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-30 19:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-30 20:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 20:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] sched: replace capacity by activity Vincent Guittot
2014-05-23 15:53 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 19:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-02 6:21 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-06-02 6:21 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-06-03 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-06-03 9:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 14:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-29 19:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-29 19:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 6:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 19:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-30 19:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 9:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] sched: consolidation of cpu_power Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 9:44 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-26 10:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 10:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 15:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-26 15:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-05-27 5:47 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-27 5:47 ` Preeti U Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53830707.5020001@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.