All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
	Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:31:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xiakrc6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509042729.1152004-16-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>

On Fri, 09 May 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Rename intel_unreference_dpll_crtc to intel_dpll_unreference_crtc
> in an effort to keep names of exported functions start with the filename.

That's a fine goal, but to me "intel dpll unreference crtc" means drop
the crtc reference from dpll, not the other way round as it is...

> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c      | 6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h      | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index d1399ab24d8c..c954515145a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ intel_reference_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * intel_unreference_dpll_crtc - Drop a DPLL reference for a CRTC
> + * intel_dpll_unreference_crtc - Drop a DPLL reference for a CRTC
>   * @crtc: CRTC on which behalf the reference is dropped
>   * @pll: DPLL for which the reference is dropped
>   * @dpll_state: the DPLL atomic state in which the reference is tracked
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ intel_reference_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>   * Drop a reference for @pll tracking the end of use of it by @crtc.
>   */
>  void
> -intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> +intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  			    const struct intel_dpll *pll,
>  			    struct intel_dpll_state *dpll_state)
>  {
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static void intel_unreference_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  
>  	dpll_state = intel_atomic_get_dpll_state(&state->base);
>  
> -	intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(crtc, pll, &dpll_state[pll->index]);
> +	intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(crtc, pll, &dpll_state[pll->index]);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_put_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> index f497a9ec863d..8b596a96344f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.h
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ int intel_reserve_dplls(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			struct intel_encoder *encoder);
>  void intel_release_dplls(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  			 struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -void intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> +void intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(const struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  				 const struct intel_dpll *pll,
>  				 struct intel_dpll_state *shared_dpll_state);
>  void icl_set_active_port_dpll(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> index ed4f305e0d3e..ee156cf2c5ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_modeset_setup.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void intel_crtc_disable_noatomic_begin(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>  	crtc->base.enabled = false;
>  
>  	if (crtc_state->intel_dpll)
> -		intel_unreference_dpll_crtc(crtc,
> +		intel_dpll_unreference_crtc(crtc,
>  					    crtc_state->intel_dpll,
>  					    &crtc_state->intel_dpll->state);
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-09 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-09  4:27 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:04   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:05   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:08   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:13   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12  4:00     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:17   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12  4:02     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:19   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:22   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:24   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:27   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:29   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12  3:19     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:31   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-12  4:27     ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:32   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33   ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09  4:27 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_update_active_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33   ` Jani Nikula
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07  8:16 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-04-07  8:16 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xiakrc6.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.