From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, arun.r.murthy@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll
Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:19:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plgikrxm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250509042729.1152004-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Fri, 09 May 2025, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll to take into the individual PLL framework
> which came in at DISPLAY_VER >= 14.
>
> --v2
> -Change naming to dpll_global to keep consistency with rest of the
> naming
>
> --v3
> -Just use intel_dpll [Jani]
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Having shared dpll stuff also in intel_dpll.c is just confusing...
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 24 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index ce5c9e74475d..b091faff6680 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -4225,7 +4225,7 @@ static int intel_crtc_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> crtc_state->update_wm_post = true;
>
> if (intel_crtc_needs_modeset(crtc_state)) {
> - ret = intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(state, crtc);
> + ret = intel_dpll_crtc_get_dpll(state, crtc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> index db67e92505d2..e25411c4171c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c
> @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
> struct intel_dpll_global_funcs {
> int (*crtc_compute_clock)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> - int (*crtc_get_shared_dpll)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> + int (*crtc_get_dpll)(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> };
>
> struct intel_limit {
> @@ -1176,8 +1176,8 @@ static int hsw_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int hsw_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static int hsw_crtc_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> @@ -1404,8 +1404,8 @@ static int ilk_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int ilk_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +static int ilk_crtc_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> @@ -1700,12 +1700,12 @@ static const struct intel_dpll_global_funcs dg2_dpll_funcs = {
>
> static const struct intel_dpll_global_funcs hsw_dpll_funcs = {
> .crtc_compute_clock = hsw_crtc_compute_clock,
> - .crtc_get_shared_dpll = hsw_crtc_get_shared_dpll,
> + .crtc_get_dpll = hsw_crtc_get_dpll,
> };
>
> static const struct intel_dpll_global_funcs ilk_dpll_funcs = {
> .crtc_compute_clock = ilk_crtc_compute_clock,
> - .crtc_get_shared_dpll = ilk_crtc_get_shared_dpll,
> + .crtc_get_dpll = ilk_crtc_get_dpll,
> };
>
> static const struct intel_dpll_global_funcs chv_dpll_funcs = {
> @@ -1758,8 +1758,8 @@ int intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -int intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> +int intel_dpll_crtc_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> {
> struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state =
> @@ -1772,10 +1772,10 @@ int intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> if (!crtc_state->hw.enable || crtc_state->intel_dpll)
> return 0;
>
> - if (!display->funcs.dpll->crtc_get_shared_dpll)
> + if (!display->funcs.dpll->crtc_get_dpll)
> return 0;
>
> - ret = display->funcs.dpll->crtc_get_shared_dpll(state, crtc);
> + ret = display->funcs.dpll->crtc_get_dpll(state, crtc);
> if (ret) {
> drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "[CRTC:%d:%s] Couldn't get a shared DPLL\n",
> crtc->base.base.id, crtc->base.name);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h
> index 280e90a57c87..3444a2dd3166 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.h
> @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ struct intel_dpll_hw_state;
> void intel_dpll_init_clock_hook(struct intel_display *display);
> int intel_dpll_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> -int intel_dpll_crtc_get_shared_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> +int intel_dpll_crtc_get_dpll(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc);
> int i9xx_calc_dpll_params(int refclk, struct dpll *clock);
> u32 i9xx_dpll_compute_fp(const struct dpll *dpll);
> void i9xx_dpll_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-09 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-09 4:27 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:04 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:05 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:07 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:00 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:17 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:02 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:19 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:22 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:25 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:27 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_[enable/disable]_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:29 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 3:19 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_unreference_dpll__crtc Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:31 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-12 4:27 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_<release/reserve>_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:32 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_compute_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
2025-05-09 4:27 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_update_active_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-05-09 10:33 ` Jani Nikula
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-07 8:16 [PATCH 00/18] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-04-07 8:16 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plgikrxm.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.