From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: "Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 21:33:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a00a1ca-fe0e-4d70-a8f8-2d328f4f1620@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611105140.1639031-7-cassel@kernel.org>
On 6/11/25 19:51, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can
> detect Link Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
> and instead enumerate the bus directly after receiving the Link Up IRQ.
>
> This means that there is no longer any delay between link up and the bus
> getting enumerated.
>
> As per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, a Downstream Port that supports Link speeds
> greater than 5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link
> training completes before sending a Configuration Request.
>
> Add this delay in the threaded link up IRQ handler in order to satisfy
> the requirements of the PCIe spec.
>
> Laszlo Fiat reported (off-list) that his PLEXTOR PX-256M8PeGN NVMe SSD is
> no longer functional, and simply reverting commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI:
> dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up") makes his
> SSD functional again. Adding the 100 ms delay as required by the spec also
> makes the SSD functional again.
>
> Cc: Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>
> Fixes: ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 93171a392879..a941a239cbfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,13 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
> if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
> if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
Should maybe this message be moved after the sleep ?
> + /*
> + * As per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, a Downstream Port that
> + * supports Link speeds greater than 5.0 GT/s, software
> + * must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link training
> + * completes before sending a Configuration Request.
> + */
> + msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
> /* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
Other than that, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: "Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 21:33:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a00a1ca-fe0e-4d70-a8f8-2d328f4f1620@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611105140.1639031-7-cassel@kernel.org>
On 6/11/25 19:51, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can
> detect Link Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
> and instead enumerate the bus directly after receiving the Link Up IRQ.
>
> This means that there is no longer any delay between link up and the bus
> getting enumerated.
>
> As per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, a Downstream Port that supports Link speeds
> greater than 5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link
> training completes before sending a Configuration Request.
>
> Add this delay in the threaded link up IRQ handler in order to satisfy
> the requirements of the PCIe spec.
>
> Laszlo Fiat reported (off-list) that his PLEXTOR PX-256M8PeGN NVMe SSD is
> no longer functional, and simply reverting commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI:
> dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up") makes his
> SSD functional again. Adding the 100 ms delay as required by the spec also
> makes the SSD functional again.
>
> Cc: Laszlo Fiat <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>
> Fixes: ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up")
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> index 93171a392879..a941a239cbfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,13 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_pcie_rc_sys_irq_thread(int irq, void *arg)
> if (reg & PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED) {
> if (rockchip_pcie_link_up(pci)) {
> dev_dbg(dev, "Received Link up event. Starting enumeration!\n");
Should maybe this message be moved after the sleep ?
> + /*
> + * As per PCIe r6.0, sec 6.6.1, a Downstream Port that
> + * supports Link speeds greater than 5.0 GT/s, software
> + * must wait a minimum of 100 ms after Link training
> + * completes before sending a Configuration Request.
> + */
> + msleep(PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS);
> /* Rescan the bus to enumerate endpoint devices */
> pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> pci_rescan_bus(pp->bridge->bus);
Other than that, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:33 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-06-11 12:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 21:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-11 21:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:19 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:19 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:40 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 12:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 12:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 13:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 13:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 14:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 14:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 15:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 15:03 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 15:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 15:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 16:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: qcom: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:34 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: dwc: Ensure that dw_pcie_wait_for_link() waits 100 ms after link up Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:35 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: dwc: Reduce LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:38 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 12:45 ` Niklas Cassel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-05 9:26 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 9:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 9:26 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 14:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 14:09 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a00a1ca-fe0e-4d70-a8f8-2d328f4f1620@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.