All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 13:40:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEq8pxE45PmeXN_W@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250612113827.GA894522@bhelgaas>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 06:38:27AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:19:45PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:14:56PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > > Commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can
> > > > detect Link Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
> > > > and instead enumerate the bus directly after receiving the Link Up IRQ.
> > > > 
> > > > This means that there is no longer any delay between link up and the bus
> > > > getting enumerated.
> 
> > > I think the comment at the PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS definition should be
> > > enough (although it might need to be updated to mention link-up).
> > > This delay is going to be a standard piece of every driver, so it
> > > won't require special notice.
> > 
> > Looking at pci.h, we already have a comment mentioning exactly this
> > (link-up):
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.16-rc1/drivers/pci/pci.h#L51-L63
> > 
> > I will change the patches to use PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS instead.
> 
> I'll more closely later, but I think PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS and
> PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS are duplicates and only one should
> exist.  It looks like they got merged at about the same time by
> different people, so we didn't notice.

I came to the same conclusion, I will send a patch to remove
PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS and convert the only existing user to use
PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS.


Kind regards,
Niklas


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 13:40:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEq8pxE45PmeXN_W@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250612113827.GA894522@bhelgaas>

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 06:38:27AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 01:19:45PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 04:14:56PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > > Commit ec9fd499b9c6 ("PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can
> > > > detect Link Up") changed so that we no longer call dw_pcie_wait_for_link(),
> > > > and instead enumerate the bus directly after receiving the Link Up IRQ.
> > > > 
> > > > This means that there is no longer any delay between link up and the bus
> > > > getting enumerated.
> 
> > > I think the comment at the PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS definition should be
> > > enough (although it might need to be updated to mention link-up).
> > > This delay is going to be a standard piece of every driver, so it
> > > won't require special notice.
> > 
> > Looking at pci.h, we already have a comment mentioning exactly this
> > (link-up):
> > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.16-rc1/drivers/pci/pci.h#L51-L63
> > 
> > I will change the patches to use PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS instead.
> 
> I'll more closely later, but I think PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS and
> PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS are duplicates and only one should
> exist.  It looks like they got merged at about the same time by
> different people, so we didn't notice.

I came to the same conclusion, I will send a patch to remove
PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS and convert the only existing user to use
PCIE_RESET_CONFIG_DEVICE_WAIT_MS.


Kind regards,
Niklas

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12 13:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-11 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 10:51   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:33   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 12:33     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 21:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-11 21:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:19     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:19       ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 11:38       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:38         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 11:40         ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-06-12 11:40           ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-12 12:21           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 12:21             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 13:00             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 13:00               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 14:44               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 14:44                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 15:03                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 15:03                   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 15:24                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 15:24                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-12 16:51                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-12 16:51                       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: qcom: " Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:34   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: dwc: Ensure that dw_pcie_wait_for_link() waits 100 ms after link up Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:35   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 10:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: dwc: Reduce LINK_WAIT_SLEEP_MS Niklas Cassel
2025-06-11 12:38   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-06-11 12:45     ` Niklas Cassel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-05  9:26 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05  9:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05  9:26   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 14:09   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-05 14:09     ` Niklas Cassel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEq8pxE45PmeXN_W@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.