From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Extract _cnl_ddi_{enable, disable}_clock()
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:33:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201183343.15292-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201183343.15292-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
All the DPCLKA_CFGCR handling follows a common pattern. Let's
extract that to a small helper that just takes a few parameters
each caller can customize.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 112 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
index b4984bbd7817..1bd2aa86183d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
@@ -3158,11 +3158,37 @@ static i915_reg_t icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_reg(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
return ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0;
}
+static void _cnl_ddi_enable_clock(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg,
+ u32 clk_sel_mask, u32 clk_sel, u32 clk_off)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&i915->dpll.lock);
+
+ intel_de_rmw(i915, reg, clk_sel_mask, clk_sel);
+
+ /*
+ * "This step and the step before must be
+ * done with separate register writes."
+ */
+ intel_de_rmw(i915, reg, clk_off, 0);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&i915->dpll.lock);
+}
+
+static void _cnl_ddi_disable_clock(struct drm_i915_private *i915, i915_reg_t reg,
+ u32 clk_off)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&i915->dpll.lock);
+
+ intel_de_rmw(i915, reg, 0, clk_off);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&i915->dpll.lock);
+}
+
static void dg1_ddi_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc_state->shared_dpll;
+ const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc_state->shared_dpll;
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, encoder->port);
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !pll))
@@ -3177,16 +3203,10 @@ static void dg1_ddi_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
(pll->info->id >= DPLL_ID_DG1_DPLL2 && phy < PHY_C)))
return;
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy),
- DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy),
- DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, phy));
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy),
- DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy), 0);
-
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
+ _cnl_ddi_enable_clock(dev_priv, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy),
+ DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(phy),
+ DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, phy),
+ DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy));
}
static void dg1_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
@@ -3194,59 +3214,33 @@ static void dg1_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, encoder->port);
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy),
- 0, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy));
-
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
+ _cnl_ddi_disable_clock(dev_priv, DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0(phy),
+ DG1_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(phy));
}
static void icl_ddi_combo_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
- struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc_state->shared_dpll;
+ const struct intel_shared_dpll *pll = crtc_state->shared_dpll;
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, encoder->port);
- i915_reg_t reg = icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_reg(dev_priv, phy);
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !pll))
return;
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
-
- /*
- * Even though this register references DDIs, note that we
- * want to pass the PHY rather than the port (DDI). For
- * ICL, port=phy in all cases so it doesn't matter, but for
- * EHL the bspec notes the following:
- *
- * "DDID clock tied to DDIA clock, so DPCLKA_CFGCR0 DDIA
- * Clock Select chooses the PLL for both DDIA and DDID and
- * drives port A in all cases."
- */
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, reg,
- icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_sel_mask(dev_priv, phy),
- icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_sel(dev_priv, pll->info->id, phy));
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, reg,
- icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_off(dev_priv, phy), 0);
-
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
+ _cnl_ddi_enable_clock(dev_priv, icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_reg(dev_priv, phy),
+ icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_sel_mask(dev_priv, phy),
+ icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_sel(dev_priv, pll->info->id, phy),
+ icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_off(dev_priv, phy));
}
static void icl_ddi_combo_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(dev_priv, encoder->port);
- i915_reg_t reg = icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_reg(dev_priv, phy);
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, reg,
- 0, icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_off(dev_priv, phy));
-
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
+ _cnl_ddi_disable_clock(dev_priv, icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_reg(dev_priv, phy),
+ icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_off(dev_priv, phy));
}
static void dg1_sanitize_port_clk_off(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
@@ -3448,20 +3442,10 @@ static void cnl_ddi_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !pll))
return;
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DPCLKA_CFGCR0,
- DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(port),
- DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, port));
-
- /*
- * "This step and the step before must be
- * done with separate register writes."
- */
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DPCLKA_CFGCR0,
- DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port), 0);
-
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
+ _cnl_ddi_enable_clock(dev_priv, DPCLKA_CFGCR0,
+ DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL_MASK(port),
+ DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_SEL(pll->info->id, port),
+ DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port));
}
static void cnl_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
@@ -3469,12 +3453,8 @@ static void cnl_ddi_disable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
enum port port = encoder->port;
- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
-
- intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, DPCLKA_CFGCR0,
- 0, DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port));
-
- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dpll.lock);
+ _cnl_ddi_disable_clock(dev_priv, DPCLKA_CFGCR0,
+ DPCLKA_CFGCR0_DDI_CLK_OFF(port));
}
static void skl_ddi_enable_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 18:33 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Clean up the DDI clock routing mess Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Extract icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_reg() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:55 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Extract icl_dpclka_cfgcr0_clk_sel*() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:59 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Introduce .{enable, disable}_clock() encoder vfuncs Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 19:04 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 19:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Extract hsw_ddi_{enable, disable}_clock() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 19:07 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 19:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Extract skl_ddi_{enable, disable}_clock() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i195: Extract cnl_ddi_{enable, disable}_clock() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Convert DG1 over to .{enable, disable}_clock() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Extract icl+ .{enable, disable}_clock() vfuncs Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Use intel_de_rmw() for DDI clock routing Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Sprinkle a few missing locks around shared DDI clock registers Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 19:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 19:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Sprinkle WARN(!pll) into icl/dg1 .clock_enable() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 19:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 18:33 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Split alds/rkl from icl_ddi_combo_{enable, disable}_clock() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 19:22 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 19:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 19:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Use .disable_clock() for pll sanitation Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 18:33 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Relocate icl_sanitize_encoder_pll_mapping() Ville Syrjala
2021-02-01 19:28 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Clean up the DDI clock routing mess Lucas De Marchi
2021-02-01 19:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-02-01 19:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-02-01 20:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-02-01 20:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-02-01 21:08 ` Vudum, Lakshminarayana
2021-02-02 6:05 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2021-02-01 21:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-02-02 2:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210201183343.15292-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox