From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dnyaneshwar Bhadane" <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/12] drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore errors using structured xe_log API
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 09:31:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928093148.E564C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928092114.1610203-7-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] xe_reg_sr: incomplete log API transition vs commit message
--
commit 4c8922a6ada2b08bcb96cfb27ef3430f71c97d7c
Author: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore errors using structured xe_log API
This commit replaces older xe_gt_notice() and xe_gt_err() logging calls with
the newer structured xe_log_info() and xe_log_err() API for register
save and restore operations.
> Replace xe_gt_notice() and xe_gt_err() calls with xe_log_info() and
> xe_log_err() using the REGS and RTP component tag for register save-restore
> operations:
>
> - Failed to add register to save-restore list
[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states that the error log for failing to add a register
to the save-restore list is replaced. However, this update appears to be
missing from the patch. Was this change unintentionally dropped during a
rebase?
For reference, xe_reg_sr_add() still contains the old call:
fail:
xe_gt_err(gt,
"discarding save-restore reg %04lx (clear: %08x, set: %08x, masked: %s, mcr: %s): ret=%d\n",
idx, e->clr_bits, e->set_bits,
str_yes_no(e->reg.masked),
str_yes_no(e->reg.mcr),
ret);
[ ... ]
> v3:
> - Drop config mismatch log (Michal)
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c
> index e328f50725572..eab84a528d122 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -87,15 +88,15 @@ static struct xe_reg sanitize_mcr(struct xe_reg_sr *sr,
>
> if (is_mcr && !reg.mcr) {
> reg.mcr = 1;
> - xe_gt_notice(gt, "xe_reg_sr_entry using non-MCR register for address 0x%x, forcing MCR\n",
> - reg.addr);
> + xe_log_info(gt, RTP, "xe_reg_sr_entry using non-MCR register for address 0x%x, forcing MCR\n",
> + reg.addr);
> reg_sr_inc_error(sr);
> }
>
> if (!is_mcr && reg.mcr) {
> reg.mcr = 0;
> - xe_gt_notice(gt, "xe_reg_sr_entry using MCR register for address 0x%x, forcing non-MCR\n",
> - reg.addr);
> + xe_log_info(gt, RTP, "xe_reg_sr_entry using MCR register for address 0x%x, forcing non-MCR\n",
> + reg.addr);
> reg_sr_inc_error(sr);
> }
[Severity: Medium]
The v3 changelog explicitly mentions dropping the config mismatch log, but
this patch updates the mismatch logs in sanitize_mcr() instead. Should these
hunks have been omitted to align with the v3 changelog?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928092114.1610203-1-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 9:21 [PATCH v4 00/12] drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] drm/xe/log: Add VRAM, PAT, and HWMON DRIVER_HARDWARE components Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] drm/xe/ggtt: Report GGTT errors using structured logging Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-29 5:15 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] drm/xe/hwmon: Report errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-29 5:25 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: Report BAR mapping " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-29 5:34 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-01 9:50 ` Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] drm/xe/memirq: Report " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 12:32 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-09-29 5:40 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] drm/xe/reg_sr: Report save-restore " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-28 12:35 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] drm/xe/pat: Return error from xe_pat_init_early() on unknown platform Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-29 5:58 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] drm/xe/pat: Report missing PAT table using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] drm/xe/pci: Report unknown GMDID versions " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-29 6:34 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] drm/xe/lmtt: Report invalidation errors " Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-29 4:51 ` Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-29 4:52 ` Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-30 8:36 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] drm/xe/vram: Report tile vs device VRAM visibility errors Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] drm/xe/vram: Report VRAM errors using structured xe_log API Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 9:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 6:48 ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-10-07 20:20 ` Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
2026-09-28 16:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Convert IO_BUS errors to structured xe_log API (rev4) Patchwork
2026-09-28 16:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-28 20:42 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260928093148.E564C1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox