Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <kernel-dev@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] drm/xe: Force flush system memory AuxCCS framebuffers before scan out
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:34:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8IPw4njV3JFQDm8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221101736.78986-11-tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:17:29AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Even though frame buffer objects are created as write-combined, in
> practice, on top of all the ring buffer flushing, an additional clflush
> seems to be needed before display engine can coherently scan out the
> AuxCCS compressed data without transient artifacts.
> 
> If for comparison we look at how i915 handles things (where AuxCCS works
> fine), as it happens it has this same clflush before a frame buffer is
> pinned for display for the first time, courtesy the dynamic tracking of
> the buffer cache mode and setting the latter to uncached before handing
> to display.
> 
> Since xe considers the buffer object caching mode as static we can
> implement the same approach by adding a flag telling us if the buffer
> was ever pinned for display and flush on the first pin. Subsequent re-pins
> will not repeat the clflush but so far I have not observed any glitching
> after the first pin.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h       | 14 +++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> index a32f3603751a..5e7813154733 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@ static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>  	struct i915_vma *vma = kzalloc(sizeof(*vma), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	struct drm_gem_object *obj = intel_fb_bo(&fb->base);
>  	struct xe_bo *bo = gem_to_xe_bo(obj);
> +	bool first_pin;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!vma)
> @@ -362,6 +363,9 @@ static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err;
>  
> +	first_pin = !bo->display_pin;
> +	bo->display_pin = true;
> +
>  	if (IS_DGFX(xe))
>  		ret = xe_bo_migrate(bo, XE_PL_VRAM0);
>  	else
> @@ -382,6 +386,15 @@ static struct i915_vma *__xe_pin_fb_vma(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>  
>  	/* Ensure DPT writes are flushed */
>  	xe_device_l2_flush(xe);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Force flush frame buffer data for non-coherent display access when
> +	 * AuxCCS formats are used.
> +	 */
> +	if (first_pin && !xe_bo_is_vram(bo) && !xe_bo_is_stolen(bo) &&
> +	    intel_fb_is_ccs_modifier(fb->base.modifier))
> +		drm_clflush_sg(xe_bo_sg(bo));
> +
>  	return vma;
>  
>  err_unpin:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> index 60c522866500..f518becb78c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo_types.h
> @@ -67,11 +67,6 @@ struct xe_bo {
>  	struct llist_node freed;
>  	/** @update_index: Update index if PT BO */
>  	int update_index;
> -	/** @created: Whether the bo has passed initial creation */
> -	bool created;
> -
> -	/** @ccs_cleared */
> -	bool ccs_cleared;
>  
>  	/**
>  	 * @cpu_caching: CPU caching mode. Currently only used for userspace
> @@ -80,6 +75,15 @@ struct xe_bo {
>  	 */
>  	u16 cpu_caching;
>  
> +	/** @created: Whether the bo has passed initial creation */
> +	bool created : 1;
> +
> +	/** @ccs_cleared */
> +	bool ccs_cleared : 1;
> +
> +	/** @display_pin: Was it ever pinned to display */
> +	bool display_pin : 1;

Is there any way that we could have this contained within display domains
instead of spreading display specific things to the core part?

> +
>  	/** @vram_userfault_link: Link into @mem_access.vram_userfault.list */
>  		struct list_head vram_userfault_link;
>  
> -- 
> 2.48.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-28 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-21 10:17 [PATCH 00/12] AuxCCS handling and render compression modifiers Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 01/12] drm/xe: Fix MOCS debugfs LNCF readout Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-27 20:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-27 23:24   ` Matt Roper
2025-02-28  8:10     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 02/12] drm/xe: Fix ring flush invalidation Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-27 23:46   ` Matt Roper
2025-02-28  9:08     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 03/12] drm/xe: Pass flags directly to emit_flush_imm_ggtt Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-27 23:47   ` Matt Roper
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 04/12] drm/xe: Add ring buffer handling for AuxCCS Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 05/12] drm/xe: Use correct type width for alignment in fb pinning code Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-28 14:57   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 06/12] drm/xe: Use fb cached min alignment Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-28 19:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 07/12] drm/xe: Reduce DPT table alignment as in i915 Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-28 19:25   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 08/12] drm/xe: Flush GGTT writes after populating DPT Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-28 19:27   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-04 14:23     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 09/12] drm/xe: Handle DPT in system memory Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 10/12] drm/xe: Force flush system memory AuxCCS framebuffers before scan out Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-28 19:34   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-03-04 14:21     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 11/12] drm/xe/display: Add support for AuxCCS Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-21 10:17 ` [PATCH 12/12] drm/xe/display: Expose AuxCCS frame buffer modifiers Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-02-28 19:32   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-21 10:25 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for AuxCCS handling and render compression modifiers (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-21 10:25 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-21 10:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-21 10:53 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 10:56 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 10:57 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-21 11:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-22  0:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8IPw4njV3JFQDm8@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox