* [PATCH] perf: arm-ccn: remove unused macros @ 2024-10-12 9:16 Ba Jing 2024-10-14 9:19 ` Mark Rutland 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ba Jing @ 2024-10-12 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: will; +Cc: mark.rutland, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Ba Jing By reading the code, I found these marcos are never referenced in the code. Just remove them. Signed-off-by: Ba Jing <bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com> --- drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c index 5c66b9278862..ea878b025d32 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c @@ -28,12 +28,7 @@ #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS 0x0008 #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__INTREQ__DESSERT 0x11 -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__ENABLE 0x02 -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__DISABLED 0x20 #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__DISABLE 0x22 -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_ENABLE 0x04 -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_DISABLED 0x40 -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_DISABLE 0x44 #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__ENABLE 0x08 #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__DISABLED 0x80 #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__DISABLE 0x88 -- 2.33.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: arm-ccn: remove unused macros 2024-10-12 9:16 [PATCH] perf: arm-ccn: remove unused macros Ba Jing @ 2024-10-14 9:19 ` Mark Rutland 2024-10-14 15:40 ` Robin Murphy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mark Rutland @ 2024-10-14 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ba Jing; +Cc: will, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Robin Murphy On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 05:16:29PM +0800, Ba Jing wrote: > By reading the code, I found these marcos are never > referenced in the code. Just remove them. > > Signed-off-by: Ba Jing <bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com> These are control bit values, so I don't see a strong reason to delete them unless we're certain we're not going to use them in future. Anyhow, Robin Murphy wrote this driver, so its up to him. Please Cc him for any changes to this driver in future. Mark. > --- > drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c > index 5c66b9278862..ea878b025d32 100644 > --- a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c > @@ -28,12 +28,7 @@ > > #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS 0x0008 > #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__INTREQ__DESSERT 0x11 > -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__ENABLE 0x02 > -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__DISABLED 0x20 > #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__DISABLE 0x22 > -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_ENABLE 0x04 > -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_DISABLED 0x40 > -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_DISABLE 0x44 > #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__ENABLE 0x08 > #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__DISABLED 0x80 > #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__DISABLE 0x88 > -- > 2.33.0 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: arm-ccn: remove unused macros 2024-10-14 9:19 ` Mark Rutland @ 2024-10-14 15:40 ` Robin Murphy 2024-10-14 16:05 ` Will Deacon 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Robin Murphy @ 2024-10-14 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Rutland, Ba Jing; +Cc: will, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel On 14/10/2024 10:19 am, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 05:16:29PM +0800, Ba Jing wrote: >> By reading the code, I found these marcos are never >> referenced in the code. Just remove them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ba Jing <bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com> > > These are control bit values, so I don't see a strong reason to delete > them unless we're certain we're not going to use them in future. > > Anyhow, Robin Murphy wrote this driver, so its up to him. Please Cc him > for any changes to this driver in future. Er, this is CCN - FWIW I didn't claim this one, nor CCI, as supported in my maintainers entry largely because active development on them has long finished, but also because I *didn't* write them, so wouldn't claim to understand them much better than you or Will do ;) However, I'd agree that there doesn't seem to be any significant benefit to removing these (certainly showing at a glance that ALL_ERRORS_DISABLE is composed equivalently to PMU_EVENTS_DISABLE seems like no bad thing.) Thanks, Robin. > > Mark. > >> --- >> drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c | 5 ----- >> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c >> index 5c66b9278862..ea878b025d32 100644 >> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c >> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c >> @@ -28,12 +28,7 @@ >> >> #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS 0x0008 >> #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__INTREQ__DESSERT 0x11 >> -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__ENABLE 0x02 >> -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__DISABLED 0x20 >> #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__ALL_ERRORS__DISABLE 0x22 >> -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_ENABLE 0x04 >> -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_DISABLED 0x40 >> -#define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__CORRECTED_ERRORS_DISABLE 0x44 >> #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__ENABLE 0x08 >> #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__DISABLED 0x80 >> #define CCN_MN_ERRINT_STATUS__PMU_EVENTS__DISABLE 0x88 >> -- >> 2.33.0 >> >> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf: arm-ccn: remove unused macros 2024-10-14 15:40 ` Robin Murphy @ 2024-10-14 16:05 ` Will Deacon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Will Deacon @ 2024-10-14 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robin Murphy; +Cc: Mark Rutland, Ba Jing, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 04:40:52PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 14/10/2024 10:19 am, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 05:16:29PM +0800, Ba Jing wrote: > > > By reading the code, I found these marcos are never > > > referenced in the code. Just remove them. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ba Jing <bajing@cmss.chinamobile.com> > > > > These are control bit values, so I don't see a strong reason to delete > > them unless we're certain we're not going to use them in future. > > > > Anyhow, Robin Murphy wrote this driver, so its up to him. Please Cc him > > for any changes to this driver in future. > > Er, this is CCN - FWIW I didn't claim this one, nor CCI, as supported in my > maintainers entry largely because active development on them has long > finished, but also because I *didn't* write them, so wouldn't claim to > understand them much better than you or Will do ;) > > However, I'd agree that there doesn't seem to be any significant benefit to > removing these (certainly showing at a glance that ALL_ERRORS_DISABLE is > composed equivalently to PMU_EVENTS_DISABLE seems like no bad thing.) Yup. FWIW, I wasn't intending to take any of the patches removing unused #defines in the PMU drivers. I'll pick the one removing an unused 'list_head', though, as that at least makes a structure a bit smaller. Will ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-14 16:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-10-12 9:16 [PATCH] perf: arm-ccn: remove unused macros Ba Jing 2024-10-14 9:19 ` Mark Rutland 2024-10-14 15:40 ` Robin Murphy 2024-10-14 16:05 ` Will Deacon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox