Re: on the irresponsibility of pursuing C language reform

[Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2575 bytes --]

Hi Branden,

> Date: 2026-08-01 15:52:26-0500
> From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Alex,
> 
> At 2026-08-01T22:42:09+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > That's public, and has been since the begining.  It's published in the
> > git repository:
> 
> I knew it was there somewhere.  (I see now--prominently, even!)

:)

> 
> > 	$ cat SPONSORS
> > 	Google               <https://opensource.google/>
> > 	Hudson River Trading <https://www.hudsonrivertrading.com/>
> > 	Meta                 <https://www.meta.com/>
> 
> I don't think many occasions call for you to quote the file contents.

In every release, I do it.  For example, see the last one:

<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/aekjQuAEaq1ILKAa@devuan/>

	> From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
	> To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
	> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
	> Subject: man-pages-6.18 released
	> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 22:04:52 +0200	[thread overview]
	> Message-ID: <aekjQuAEaq1ILKAa@devuan> (raw)
	> 
	> Gidday!
	> 
	> I'm proud to announce:
	> 
	> 	man-pages-6.18 - manual pages for GNU+Linux
	> 
	...
	> 
	> Thanks to all the contributors to this release (in BCC)!
	> And thanks to our sponsors!
	> 
	> 	$ sort --random-sort <SPONSORS;
	> 	Meta                 <https://www.meta.com/>
	> 	Hudson River Trading <https://www.hudsonrivertrading.com/>
	> 	Google               <https://opensource.google/>

Properly random-sorted, to avoid any preferences.  In the actual file,
they're sorted alphabetically.  I haven't even asked how much money each
of them pays to me, because I don't want to know.  I only get the total
amount through the Linux Foundation.  (But FWIW, I guess the three pay
the same.)

> In your position I would simply have the URL to this file handy for any
> occasion where someone takes a run at my transparency.

Yup.

> In fact I think your approach to disclosure is near-optimal.

I've been thinking that I should disclose the total amount in the commit
messages that update the file.

>  In my view
> it is strongly superior to slathering acknowledgements of your sponsors
> on all of your emails in your capacity as Linux man-pages maintainer,
> which would degrade software engineering into something like NASCAR.

I do in the releases, but since they only happen a few times a year,
I guess it's okay.

> (There I go, alienating yet another fan community...)
> 
> Regards,
> Branden


Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]