From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
andersen@codepoet.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI hotplug support
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:53:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210150953.29905.oliver@neukum.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021015002252.GE1274@redhat.com>
> > It's harder than doing it the simple way. User space really can do
> > nothing but do the call.
>
> Not true, see my last email. User space can do a *lot* more than just
> make the call to add the device, and as a matter of fact it already does.
But surely it can do more if it can be called with knowledge of a device node,
can't it? Nobody argues against doing a hotplug call. But divorcing
recognisition on the bus and attaching a driver to it seems to be bad
to me. After all there's nothing you can do with a SCSI device without device
node.
Plus you keep a difference between the coldplugging and the hotplugging case,
which is not nice.
> > Plus, you can use such a kernel API to really free the device's
> > memory, because you cannot know when user space, or indeed if, has
> > freed the device.
>
> Not true at all. Define a revoke/slave_detach entry point to your driver
> and you get called when the device is removed so that you can free up any
> of your resources.
I see.
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-14 5:40 [PATCH] SCSI hotplug support Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 7:06 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-10-14 7:12 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 15:47 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-10-14 16:19 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-14 20:41 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 22:10 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-14 20:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-14 17:22 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-14 17:30 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-10-14 17:39 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-14 19:11 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-10-15 0:42 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-10-14 20:37 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 21:07 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-14 21:54 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 22:25 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 5:25 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 15:33 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 18:18 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 18:22 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 18:45 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 19:13 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 19:32 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 19:45 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-15 19:50 ` Scott Merritt
2002-10-15 19:55 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 22:07 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-16 2:40 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-18 11:28 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 21:43 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 22:07 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 22:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 0:22 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 7:53 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2002-10-15 14:35 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 15:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-15 17:47 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 18:34 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 18:22 ` Scott Merritt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210150953.29905.oliver@neukum.name \
--to=oliver@neukum.name \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andersen@codepoet.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox