From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI hotplug support
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:34:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021015183405.GB4391@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021015174708.GA15778@codepoet.org>
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:47:08AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Tue Oct 15, 2002 at 10:35:33AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > Now, please, someone tell me why everyone is whining about user space
> > doing so little to accomplish what the much larger patch that was
> > posted does in kernel space? My point is, and was, that since we need the
>
> Much larger patch? If you look closely, that patch is actually
> very small. It simply moves the code already the proc/scsi/scsi
> "scsi add-single-device" and "scsi remove-single-device" handlers
> into standalone functions. There is actually not so much as a
> single line of new code...
Well, there is to. You then export the functions. Aside from the export
and the intended use, I'm actually all for the patch and moving that code
into separate functions. I just don't want those functions called from
all over the place.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> 919-754-3700 x44233
Red Hat, Inc.
1801 Varsity Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27606
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-14 5:40 [PATCH] SCSI hotplug support Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 7:06 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-10-14 7:12 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 15:47 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-10-14 16:19 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-14 20:41 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 22:10 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-14 20:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 15:57 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-14 17:22 ` Mike Anderson
2002-10-14 17:30 ` Matthew Dharm
2002-10-14 17:39 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-14 19:11 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-10-15 0:42 ` Kurt Garloff
2002-10-14 20:37 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 21:07 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-14 21:54 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 22:25 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 5:25 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 15:33 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 18:18 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 18:22 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 18:45 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 19:13 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 19:32 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 19:45 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-15 19:50 ` Scott Merritt
2002-10-15 19:55 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 22:07 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-16 2:40 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-18 11:28 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 21:43 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 22:07 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-14 22:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 0:22 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 7:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 14:35 ` Doug Ledford
2002-10-15 15:19 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-10-15 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2002-10-15 17:47 ` Erik Andersen
2002-10-15 18:34 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2002-10-15 18:22 ` Scott Merritt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021015183405.GB4391@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=andersen@codepoet.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox