* [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
@ 2025-01-24 18:34 kan.liang
2025-01-27 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kan.liang @ 2025-01-24 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, irogers, adrian.hunter,
alexander.shishkin, linux-kernel
Cc: Kan Liang
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
$ dmesg | grep PEBS
[ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
$ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
"dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
cannot be created successfully.
The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
from the existing hybrid platforms.
Fixes: d9977c43bff8 ("perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 ----------
arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 7f1b6b90a5fb..0a1030eb6db8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4981,11 +4981,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
else
pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
- if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
- pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
- else
- pmu->pmu.capabilities &= ~PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
-
intel_pmu_check_event_constraints(pmu->event_constraints,
pmu->cntr_mask64,
pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64,
@@ -5063,9 +5058,6 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
pr_info("%s PMU driver: ", pmu->name);
- if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
- pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT ");
-
pr_cont("\n");
x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
@@ -6420,11 +6412,9 @@ static __always_inline int intel_pmu_init_hybrid(enum hybrid_pmu_type pmus)
pmu->intel_cap.capabilities = x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities;
if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_small_tiny) {
pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 0;
- pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 1;
pmu->mid_ack = true;
} else if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_big) {
pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 1;
- pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 0;
pmu->late_ack = true;
}
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 13a78a8a2780..123b0e4392b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -2742,7 +2742,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
}
pr_cont("PEBS fmt%d%c%s, ", format, pebs_type, pebs_qual);
- if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
+ if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
}
--
2.38.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
2025-01-24 18:34 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid kan.liang
@ 2025-01-27 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:34 ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2025-01-27 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kan.liang, peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, irogers,
alexander.shishkin, linux-kernel
On 24/01/25 20:34, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
> platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
>
> $ dmesg | grep PEBS
> [ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
>
> $ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
> cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
> Error:
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
> for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>
> The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
> capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
> perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
> supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
> cannot be created successfully.
>
> The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
> will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
> from the existing hybrid platforms.
>
> Fixes: d9977c43bff8 ("perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs")
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 ----------
> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 7f1b6b90a5fb..0a1030eb6db8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -4981,11 +4981,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
> else
> pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
>
> - if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
> - pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
> - else
> - pmu->pmu.capabilities &= ~PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
> -
> intel_pmu_check_event_constraints(pmu->event_constraints,
> pmu->cntr_mask64,
> pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64,
> @@ -5063,9 +5058,6 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
>
> pr_info("%s PMU driver: ", pmu->name);
>
> - if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
> - pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT ");
> -
> pr_cont("\n");
>
> x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
> @@ -6420,11 +6412,9 @@ static __always_inline int intel_pmu_init_hybrid(enum hybrid_pmu_type pmus)
> pmu->intel_cap.capabilities = x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities;
> if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_small_tiny) {
> pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 0;
> - pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 1;
> pmu->mid_ack = true;
> } else if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_big) {
> pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 1;
> - pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 0;
> pmu->late_ack = true;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> index 13a78a8a2780..123b0e4392b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
> @@ -2742,7 +2742,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
> }
> pr_cont("PEBS fmt%d%c%s, ", format, pebs_type, pebs_qual);
>
> - if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
> + if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
I'd suggest keeping the !is_hybrid() check here
since it documents and enforces the effective policy.
> pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
> x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
2025-01-24 18:34 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid kan.liang
2025-01-27 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
@ 2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
2025-01-27 11:42 ` Adrian Hunter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Shishkin @ 2025-01-27 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kan.liang, peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, irogers, adrian.hunter,
linux-kernel, alexander.shishkin
Cc: Kan Liang
[sending again, because smtp is hard, for some reason]
kan.liang@linux.intel.com writes:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
> platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
>
> $ dmesg | grep PEBS
> [ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
>
> $ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
> cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
> Error:
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
> for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>
> The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
> capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
> perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
> supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
> cannot be created successfully.
>
> The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
> will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
> from the existing hybrid platforms.
There are still lots of them in use in the wild, I'd still like to fix
this properly instead of chopping it off. Unless there's a reason not to?
Thanks,
--
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
@ 2025-01-27 11:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Hunter @ 2025-01-27 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Shishkin, kan.liang, peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung,
irogers, linux-kernel
On 27/01/25 11:42, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> [sending again, because smtp is hard, for some reason]
> kan.liang@linux.intel.com writes:
>
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
>> platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
>>
>> $ dmesg | grep PEBS
>> [ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
>>
>> $ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
>> cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
>> Error:
>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
>> for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>
>> The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
>> capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
>> perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
>> supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
>> cannot be created successfully.
>>
>> The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
>> will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
>> from the existing hybrid platforms.
>
> There are still lots of them in use in the wild, I'd still like to fix
> this properly instead of chopping it off. Unless there's a reason not to?
The kernel has never supported PEBS-via-PT on hybrids before.
AFAIK no one is asking for it on hybrids.
Note, it will continue to work on non-hybrid atom/e-core systems
like ADL-N etc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
2025-01-27 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
@ 2025-01-27 14:34 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2025-01-27 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Hunter, peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung, irogers,
alexander.shishkin, linux-kernel
On 2025-01-27 3:19 a.m., Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 24/01/25 20:34, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
>> platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
>>
>> $ dmesg | grep PEBS
>> [ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
>>
>> $ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
>> cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
>> Error:
>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
>> for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>
>> The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
>> capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
>> perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
>> supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
>> cannot be created successfully.
>>
>> The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
>> will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
>> from the existing hybrid platforms.
>>
>> Fixes: d9977c43bff8 ("perf/x86: Register hybrid PMUs")
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 10 ----------
>> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index 7f1b6b90a5fb..0a1030eb6db8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -4981,11 +4981,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
>> else
>> pmu->intel_ctrl &= ~(1ULL << GLOBAL_CTRL_EN_PERF_METRICS);
>>
>> - if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
>> - pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>> - else
>> - pmu->pmu.capabilities &= ~PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>> -
>> intel_pmu_check_event_constraints(pmu->event_constraints,
>> pmu->cntr_mask64,
>> pmu->fixed_cntr_mask64,
>> @@ -5063,9 +5058,6 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
>>
>> pr_info("%s PMU driver: ", pmu->name);
>>
>> - if (pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available)
>> - pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT ");
>> -
>> pr_cont("\n");
>>
>> x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
>> @@ -6420,11 +6412,9 @@ static __always_inline int intel_pmu_init_hybrid(enum hybrid_pmu_type pmus)
>> pmu->intel_cap.capabilities = x86_pmu.intel_cap.capabilities;
>> if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_small_tiny) {
>> pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 0;
>> - pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 1;
>> pmu->mid_ack = true;
>> } else if (pmu->pmu_type & hybrid_big) {
>> pmu->intel_cap.perf_metrics = 1;
>> - pmu->intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available = 0;
>> pmu->late_ack = true;
>> }
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> index 13a78a8a2780..123b0e4392b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
>> @@ -2742,7 +2742,7 @@ void __init intel_ds_init(void)
>> }
>> pr_cont("PEBS fmt%d%c%s, ", format, pebs_type, pebs_qual);
>>
>> - if (!is_hybrid() && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
>> + if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_output_pt_available) {
>
> I'd suggest keeping the !is_hybrid() check here
> since it documents and enforces the effective policy.
Sigh, the !is_hybrid() should never work here either. Because the
intel_ds_init() is invoked before intel_pmu_init_hybrid(), which enable
perf_is_hybrid.
I think we'd better remove it, but I will add some comments to explain
the status of PEBS-via-PT on hybrid instead. For example,
/*
* The PEBS-via-PT is not supported on hybrid platforms, because not all
* CPUs of a hybrid machine support the feature. The global
* x86_pmu.intel_cap, which only contains the common capabilities, is
* used to check the availability of the feature. The per-PMU
* pebs_output_pt_available in a hybrid machine will be ignored.
*/
Thanks,
Kan
>
>> pr_cont("PEBS-via-PT, ");
>> x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_AUX_OUTPUT;
>> }
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid
2025-01-27 11:42 ` Adrian Hunter
@ 2025-01-27 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Kan @ 2025-01-27 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adrian Hunter, Alexander Shishkin, peterz, mingo, acme, namhyung,
irogers, linux-kernel
On 2025-01-27 6:42 a.m., Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 27/01/25 11:42, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> [sending again, because smtp is hard, for some reason]
>> kan.liang@linux.intel.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> The PEBS-via-PT feature is exposed for the e-core of some hybrid
>>> platforms, e.g., ADL and MTL. But it never works.
>>>
>>> $ dmesg | grep PEBS
>>> [ 1.793888] core: cpu_atom PMU driver: PEBS-via-PT
>>>
>>> $ perf record -c 1000 -e '{intel_pt/branch=0/,
>>> cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp}' -C8
>>> Error:
>>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
>>> for event (cpu_atom/cpu-cycles,aux-output/pp).
>>> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
>>>
>>> The "PEBS-via-PT" is printed if the corresponding bit of per-PMU
>>> capabilities is set. Since the feature is supported by the e-core HW,
>>> perf sets the bit for e-core. However, for Intel PT, if a feature is not
>>> supported on all CPUs, it is not supported at all. The PEBS-via-PT event
>>> cannot be created successfully.
>>>
>>> The PEBS-via-PT is no longer enumerated on the latest hybrid platform. It
>>> will be deprecated on future platforms with Arch PEBS. Let's remove it
>>> from the existing hybrid platforms.
>>
>> There are still lots of them in use in the wild, I'd still like to fix
>> this properly instead of chopping it off. Unless there's a reason not to?
>
> The kernel has never supported PEBS-via-PT on hybrids before.
> AFAIK no one is asking for it on hybrids.
Right, I didn't get the request on hybrid either.
>
> Note, it will continue to work on non-hybrid atom/e-core systems
> like ADL-N etc
>
Right, ADL-N and all the non-hybrid still works.
It removes the false claim on the hybrid ADL, MTL, RPL, LNL, and Arrow Lake.
Thanks,
Kan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-27 14:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-24 18:34 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Clean up PEBS-via-PT on hybrid kan.liang
2025-01-27 8:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:34 ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-27 9:42 ` Alexander Shishkin
2025-01-27 11:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-01-27 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox