From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:44:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445971482.2757.27.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151027181555.GE5828@x1>
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> > > individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
> > > to a subsystem or specific file. However, according to MAINTAINERS
> > > we have 1046 Maintainers and only a mere 22 Reviewers. I believe
> > > these numbers to be incorrect, as many of these Maintainers are in
> > > fact Reviewers.
Most entries in MAINTAINERS seem to be vanity entries than actual
active participants. A person typically writes a driver, adds a
MAINTAINER entry, then forgets about it and/or the hardware becomes
outdated.
> > > I have taken the time to identify some of the Reviewers who pertain
> > > to subsystems which I look after, and have changed their status from
> > > Maintainer (collector of patches) to Reviewer (reviewer of code).
> >
> > [for drivers/power/*]
> > Acked-By: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks.
>
> > I think you should CC the people, which are changed from "M:" to
> > "R:", though.
>
> Yes, makes sense.
>
> I'd like to collect some Maintainer Acks first though.
I think people from organizations like Samsung are actual
maintainers not reviewers.
Their drivers are not thrown over a wall and forgotten.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, wsa@the-dreams.de, ben-linux@fluff.org,
cw00.choi@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:44:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445971482.2757.27.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151027181555.GE5828@x1>
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:15 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:42:37PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Since eafbaac ("MAINTAINERS: Add "R:" designated-reviewers tag") we
> > > have been able to tag specific people as Reviewers. These are key
> > > individuals who are tasked with or volunteer to review code submitted
> > > to a subsystem or specific file. However, according to MAINTAINERS
> > > we have 1046 Maintainers and only a mere 22 Reviewers. I believe
> > > these numbers to be incorrect, as many of these Maintainers are in
> > > fact Reviewers.
Most entries in MAINTAINERS seem to be vanity entries than actual
active participants. A person typically writes a driver, adds a
MAINTAINER entry, then forgets about it and/or the hardware becomes
outdated.
> > > I have taken the time to identify some of the Reviewers who pertain
> > > to subsystems which I look after, and have changed their status from
> > > Maintainer (collector of patches) to Reviewer (reviewer of code).
> >
> > [for drivers/power/*]
> > Acked-By: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks.
>
> > I think you should CC the people, which are changed from "M:" to
> > "R:", though.
>
> Yes, makes sense.
>
> I'd like to collect some Maintainer Acks first though.
I think people from organizations like Samsung are actual
maintainers not reviewers.
Their drivers are not thrown over a wall and forgotten.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 15:42 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-27 15:42 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 16:41 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output Joe Perches
2015-10-28 16:41 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:14 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445971482.2757.27.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.