From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:56:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563160B2.7070305@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028143838.GG4058@x1>
On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>
> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but
> are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far
> that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that
> agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition)
> Reviewers -- go figure.
>
I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :)
If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that
maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any
problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review.
In that case, that would be:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:56:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563160B2.7070305@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028143838.GG4058@x1>
On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>
> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but
> are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far
> that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that
> agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition)
> Reviewers -- go figure.
>
I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :)
If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that
maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any
problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review.
In that case, that would be:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 15:42 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-27 15:42 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 16:41 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output Joe Perches
2015-10-28 16:41 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:14 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563160B2.7070305@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.