From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:39:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151028093907.GP4931@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56309419.4060908@samsung.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > That's not the case at all. All it does is better describe the (very
> > worthy) function you *actually* provide.
>
> It is getting into dispute about entire change of yours... which is not
> what I want. I agree with your general idea but I was referring only to
> that particular case - the Samsung PMICs (and Maxim PMICs/MUICs which
> would fall into same category).
Not being affected by this change, I wonder what the technical
difference is if someone is listed as reviewer instead of maintainer.
Does get_maintainer.pl behave differently?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
wsa@the-dreams.de, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:39:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151028093907.GP4931@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56309419.4060908@samsung.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
> > You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
> > That's not the case at all. All it does is better describe the (very
> > worthy) function you *actually* provide.
>
> It is getting into dispute about entire change of yours... which is not
> what I want. I agree with your general idea but I was referring only to
> that particular case - the Samsung PMICs (and Maxim PMICs/MUICs which
> would fall into same category).
Not being affected by this change, I wonder what the technical
difference is if someone is listed as reviewer instead of maintainer.
Does get_maintainer.pl behave differently?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 15:42 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-27 15:42 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 16:41 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output Joe Perches
2015-10-28 16:41 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:14 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151028093907.GP4931@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.