Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Reddy Guddati, Santhosh" <santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <swati2.sharma@intel.com>, <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v3 02/11] tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: use intel_fbc_get_fbc_status()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:48:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75c0b4e8-5bc6-4ce1-b0bc-bf6bf8d6f8d1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416092559.88735-3-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>



On 16-04-2026 14:55, Vinod Govindapillai wrote:
> Use the common intel_fbc_get_fbc_status() to get the fbc status
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 54 ++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c b/tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> index c16f63199..b01959d2c 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> @@ -1570,13 +1570,13 @@ static void drrs_print_status(void)
>   static struct timespec fbc_get_last_action(void)
>   {
>   	struct timespec ret = { 0, 0 };
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
>   	char *action;
>   	ssize_t n_read;
>   
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	action = strstr(buf, "\nLast action:");
> +	action = strstr(fbc_status, "\nLast action:");
>   	igt_assert(action);
>   
>   	n_read = sscanf(action, "Last action: %ld.%ld",
> @@ -1620,12 +1620,12 @@ static void fbc_update_last_action(void)
>   static void fbc_setup_last_action(void)
>   {
>   	ssize_t n_read;
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
>   	char *action;
>   
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	action = strstr(buf, "\nLast action:");
> +	action = strstr(fbc_status, "\nLast action:");
>   	if (!action) {
>   		igt_info("FBC last action not supported\n");
>   		return;
> @@ -1640,10 +1640,11 @@ static void fbc_setup_last_action(void)
>   
>   static bool fbc_is_compressing(void)
>   {
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "\nCompressing: yes\n") != NULL;
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
> +
> +	return strstr(fbc_status, "\nCompressing: yes\n");
>   }
>   
>   static bool fbc_wait_for_compression(void)
> @@ -1653,45 +1654,50 @@ static bool fbc_wait_for_compression(void)
>   
>   static bool fbc_not_enough_stolen(void)
>   {
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
> +
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "FBC disabled: not enough stolen memory\n");
> +	return strstr(fbc_status, "FBC disabled: not enough stolen memory\n");
>   }
>   
>   static bool fbc_stride_not_supported(void)

The next commit deletes all this code and replace all this with 
intel_fbc_found_skip_reason(). Imho, we should squash this commit.>   {
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
> +
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "FBC disabled: framebuffer stride not supported\n");
> +	return strstr(fbc_status, "FBC disabled: framebuffer stride not supported\n");
>   }
>   
>   static bool fbc_mode_too_large(void)
>   {
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "FBC disabled: mode too large for compression\n");
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
> +
> +	return strstr(fbc_status, "FBC disabled: mode too large for compression\n");
>   }
>   
>   static bool fbc_psr_not_possible(void)
>   {
> -	char buf[128];
> +	char fbc_status[128];
> +
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(buf, "FBC disabled: PSR1 enabled (Wa_14016291713)");
> +	return strstr(fbc_status, "FBC disabled: PSR1 enabled (Wa_14016291713)");
>   }
>   
>   static bool fbc_enable_per_plane(int plane_index, igt_crtc_t *crtc)
>   {
> -	char buf[PATH_MAX];
> +	char fbc_status[PATH_MAX];
>   	char buf_plane[128];
>   
>   	sprintf(buf_plane, "%d%s", plane_index, igt_crtc_name(crtc));
>   
> -	debugfs_read_crtc("i915_fbc_status", buf);
> -	return strstr(strstr(buf, "*"), buf_plane);
> +	intel_fbc_get_fbc_status(prim_mode_params.crtc, fbc_status, sizeof(fbc_status));
> +
> +	return strstr(strstr(fbc_status, "*"), buf_plane);
>   }
>   
>   static bool drrs_wait_until_rr_switch_to_low(void)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-30  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16  9:25 [PATCH i-g-t v3 00/11] updates to fbc tests Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 01/11] lib/i915/fbc: extract intel_fbc_get_fbc_status() Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  2:56   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 02/11] tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: use intel_fbc_get_fbc_status() Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  3:18   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh [this message]
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 03/11] tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: update the outdated fbc status reasons Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  3:37   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-30  7:05     ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2026-04-30  8:30       ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 04/11] tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: consolidate fbc tests skip checks Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  4:35   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-30  7:12     ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 05/11] tests/intel/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: use a bigger buffer for fbc status Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  3:45   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 06/11] tests/intel/kms_fbcon_fbt: " Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  3:46   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 07/11] tests/intel/kms_fbcon_fbt: update the outdated fbc skip reasons Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  3:56   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-30  7:11     ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 08/11] tests/intel/kms_fbcon_fbt: refactor the code to get the right fbc status Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 09/11] tests/intel/kms_fbcon_fbt: find and store the crtc index Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 10/11] tests/intel/kms_fbcon_fbt: find the correct fbc status of a pipe Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-16  9:25 ` [PATCH i-g-t v3 11/11] tests/intel/kms_fbcon_fbt: use common routine to skip tests on fbc status Vinod Govindapillai
2026-04-30  4:06   ` Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2026-04-16 16:24 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for updates to fbc tests (rev3) Patchwork
2026-04-16 16:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-16 18:08 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-17  4:43 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75c0b4e8-5bc6-4ce1-b0bc-bf6bf8d6f8d1@intel.com \
    --to=santhosh.reddy.guddati@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox