[PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

[PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

[Daniel Vetter]

gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index b839728..35833fc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state {
 		u32 tiling:2;
 		u32 dirty:1;
 		u32 purgeable:1;
-		u32 ring:4;
+		s32 ring:4;
 		u32 cache_level:2;
 	} *active_bo, *pinned_bo;
 	u32 active_bo_count, pinned_bo_count;
-- 
1.7.9

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

[Paul Menzel]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]

Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 11:03 +0100 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.

which was introduced by the following commit.

        96154f2faba5: "drm/i915: switch ring->id to be a real id"

> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>

The URL of the report is the following.

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-February/019183.html

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Acked-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index b839728..35833fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state {
>  		u32 tiling:2;
>  		u32 dirty:1;
>  		u32 purgeable:1;
> -		u32 ring:4;
> +		s32 ring:4;
>  		u32 cache_level:2;
>  	} *active_bo, *pinned_bo;
>  	u32 active_bo_count, pinned_bo_count;


Thanks,

Paul

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

[Dan Carpenter]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 442 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.
> 

Sorry, I should have said that it's not a gcc warning, it's a
smatch thing.  But also it's not uber-anal.  It's the exact level of
anality which is required to make the == -1 test work.  You can
compare unsigned int and longs to -1 and it works but for smaller
types it doesn't.

regards,
dan carpenter


[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: error_buffer->ring should be signed

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 02:16:27PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > gcc seems to get uber-anal recently about these things.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I should have said that it's not a gcc warning, it's a
> smatch thing.  But also it's not uber-anal.  It's the exact level of
> anality which is required to make the == -1 test work.  You can
> compare unsigned int and longs to -1 and it works but for smaller
> types it doesn't.

I've picked this one here up for -next, thanks for your clarification
(added to the commit message in).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48