public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: s/PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC/PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC/
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 20:55:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230418175528.13117-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418175528.13117-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Fix a typo in the PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC define.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h           | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
index a96f8ecbeec1..4437d130293a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static void glk_program_nearest_filter_coefs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	int i;
 
 	intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, GLK_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set),
-			  PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC);
+			  PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 17 * 7; i += 2) {
 		u32 tmp;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index f8e6b86facc3..a5ae291de55b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -4146,7 +4146,7 @@
 #define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A	   0x68298
 #define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B	   0x68998
 #define _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B	   0x68A98
-#define PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC	   (1 << 10)
+#define PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC	   (1 << 10)
 
 #define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A	   0x6819C
 #define _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A	   0x6829C
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-18 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18 17:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Check pipe source size when using skl+ scalers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:11   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Relocate VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:13   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Relocate intel_atomic_setup_scalers() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:16   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Relocate skl_get_pfit_config() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:17   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co for the pre-ilk pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Namespace pfit registers properly Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for ilk+ pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:29   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Drop a useless forward declararion Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:30   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for ilk pfit window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:34   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-20 12:09     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-25 10:49       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Remove dead scaler register defines Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:35   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Rename skl+ scaler binding bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 19:36   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38     ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 22:06   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " kernel test robot
2023-04-19 15:38   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2023-04-19 15:38   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: s/PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC/PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC/ Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for sik+ scaler window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:41   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for pipe scaler registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:48   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Define more PS_CTRL bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-19  4:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230418175528.13117-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox