From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Relocate VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:13:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs8vzyzf.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418175528.13117-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Move the VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US definition to a slightly
> better place.
I wish this could be hidden in intel_crtc.c but this is an improvement.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.h | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h | 10 ----------
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.h
> index 73077137fb99..51a4c8df9e65 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ struct intel_atomic_state;
> struct intel_crtc;
> struct intel_crtc_state;
>
> +/*
> + * FIXME: We should instead only take spinlocks once for the entire update
> + * instead of once per mmio.
> + */
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
> +#define VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US 250
> +#else
> +#define VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US 100
> +#endif
> +
> int intel_usecs_to_scanlines(const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode,
> int usecs);
> u32 intel_crtc_max_vblank_count(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index abd16a2b1f7a..e72288662f02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include "i915_debugfs.h"
> #include "i915_irq.h"
> #include "i915_reg.h"
> +#include "intel_crtc.h"
> #include "intel_de.h"
> #include "intel_crtc_state_dump.h"
> #include "intel_display_debugfs.h"
> @@ -30,7 +31,6 @@
> #include "intel_panel.h"
> #include "intel_psr.h"
> #include "intel_psr_regs.h"
> -#include "intel_sprite.h"
> #include "intel_wm.h"
>
> static inline struct drm_i915_private *node_to_i915(struct drm_info_node *node)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h
> index 4635c7ad23f9..91c6dca342b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sprite.h
> @@ -16,16 +16,6 @@ struct intel_crtc_state;
> struct intel_plane_state;
> enum pipe;
>
> -/*
> - * FIXME: We should instead only take spinlocks once for the entire update
> - * instead of once per mmio.
> - */
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
> -#define VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US 250
> -#else
> -#define VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US 100
> -#endif
> -
> struct intel_plane *intel_sprite_plane_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> enum pipe pipe, int plane);
> int intel_sprite_set_colorkey_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-18 17:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Check pipe source size when using skl+ scalers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:11 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Relocate VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:13 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Relocate intel_atomic_setup_scalers() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:16 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Relocate skl_get_pfit_config() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:17 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co for the pre-ilk pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Namespace pfit registers properly Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for ilk+ pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:29 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Drop a useless forward declararion Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for ilk pfit window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:34 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-20 12:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-25 10:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Remove dead scaler register defines Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:35 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Rename skl+ scaler binding bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " kernel test robot
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: s/PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC/PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC/ Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for sik+ scaler window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for pipe scaler registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:48 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Define more PS_CTRL bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-19 4:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fs8vzyzf.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox