From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for ilk+ pfit registers
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:29:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qkfzy89.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418175528.13117-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Polish the ilk+ pfit registers with REG_BIT() & co., and
> also take the opportunity to unify the ivb/hsw vs. not checks
> in ilk_pfit_enable() and ilk_get_pfit_config().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 9 +++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index ea1b0e87ae35..e9000ed15e7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3230,11 +3230,17 @@ static void ilk_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> u32 ctl, pos, size;
> + enum pipe pipe;
>
> ctl = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PF_CTL(crtc->pipe));
> if ((ctl & PF_ENABLE) == 0)
> return;
>
> + if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> + pipe = REG_FIELD_GET(PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB, ctl);
> + else
> + pipe = crtc->pipe;
> +
> crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled = true;
>
> pos = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PF_WIN_POS(crtc->pipe));
> @@ -3249,8 +3255,7 @@ static void ilk_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> * ivb/hsw (since we don't use the higher upscaling modes which
> * differentiates them) so just WARN about this case for now.
> */
> - drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 7 &&
> - (ctl & PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB) != PF_PIPE_SEL_IVB(crtc->pipe));
> + drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, pipe != crtc->pipe);
> }
>
> static bool ilk_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index eea739e0b48a..3c02f6c70733 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4008,16 +4008,16 @@
>
> /* CPU panel fitter */
> /* IVB+ has 3 fitters, 0 is 7x5 capable, the other two only 3x3 */
> -#define _PFA_CTL_1 0x68080
> -#define _PFB_CTL_1 0x68880
> -#define PF_ENABLE (1 << 31)
> -#define PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB (3 << 29)
> -#define PF_PIPE_SEL_IVB(pipe) ((pipe) << 29)
> -#define PF_FILTER_MASK (3 << 23)
> -#define PF_FILTER_PROGRAMMED (0 << 23)
> -#define PF_FILTER_MED_3x3 (1 << 23)
> -#define PF_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE (2 << 23)
> -#define PF_FILTER_EDGE_SOFTEN (3 << 23)
> +#define _PFA_CTL_1 0x68080
> +#define _PFB_CTL_1 0x68880
> +#define PF_ENABLE REG_BIT(31)
> +#define PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB REG_GENMASK(30, 29) /* ivb/hsw */
> +#define PF_PIPE_SEL_IVB(pipe) REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB, (pipe))
> +#define PF_FILTER_MASK REG_GENMASK(24, 23)
> +#define PF_FILTER_PROGRAMMED REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_MASK, 0)
> +#define PF_FILTER_MED_3x3 REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_MASK, 1)
> +#define PF_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_EDGE_MASK, 2)
> +#define PF_FILTER_EDGE_SOFTEN REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_EDGE_MASK, 3)
> #define _PFA_WIN_SZ 0x68074
> #define _PFB_WIN_SZ 0x68874
> #define _PFA_WIN_POS 0x68070
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-18 17:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Check pipe source size when using skl+ scalers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:11 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Relocate VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:13 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Relocate intel_atomic_setup_scalers() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:16 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Relocate skl_get_pfit_config() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:17 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co for the pre-ilk pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Namespace pfit registers properly Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for ilk+ pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:29 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Drop a useless forward declararion Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for ilk pfit window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:34 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-20 12:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-25 10:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Remove dead scaler register defines Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:35 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Rename skl+ scaler binding bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 22:06 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " kernel test robot
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: s/PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC/PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC/ Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for sik+ scaler window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for pipe scaler registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:48 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Define more PS_CTRL bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-19 4:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qkfzy89.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox