From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/19] drm/i915/dsb: Use DEwake to combat PkgC latency
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 18:51:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRRPi3iQeFdQrEIL@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB63602CC163A61DEE251714E2F4F0A@DM4PR11MB6360.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 06:08:42PM +0000, Shankar, Uma wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Ville
> > Syrjala
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 12:45 AM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/19] drm/i915/dsb: Use DEwake to combat PkgC
> > latency
> >
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Normally we could be in a deep PkgC state all the way up to the point when DSB
> > starts its execution at the transcoders undelayed vblank. The DSB will then have
> > to wait for the hardware to wake up before it can execute anything. This will
> > waste a huge chunk of the vblank time just waiting, and risks the DSB execution
> > spilling into the vertical active period. That will be very bad, especially when
> > programming the LUTs as the anti-collision logic will cause DSB to corrupt LUT
> > writes during vertical active.
> >
> > To avoid these problems we can instruct the DSB to pre-wake the display engined
> > on a specific scanline so that everything will be 100% ready to go when we hit the
> > transcoder's undelayed vblank.
> >
> > One annoyance is that the scanline is specified as just that, a single scanline. So if
> > we happen to start the DSB execution after passing said scanline no DEwake will
> > happen and we may drop back into some PkgC state before reaching the
> > transcoder's undelayed vblank. To prevent that we'll use the "force DEwake" bit
> > to manually force the display engined to stay awake. We'll then have to clear the
>
> Nit: Typo in engine
>
> > force bit again after the DSB is done (the force bit remains effective even when
> > the DSB is otherwise disabled).
>
> Approach looks good, this will help hardware be ready and maximize the chance of
> update within the vblank.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h | 3 +-
> > 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > index b3dd4013d058..c5a9ea53a718 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_color.c
> > @@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@ void intel_color_prepare_commit(struct
> > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> > if (!crtc_state->pre_csc_lut && !crtc_state->post_csc_lut)
> > return;
> >
> > - crtc_state->dsb = intel_dsb_prepare(crtc, 1024);
> > + crtc_state->dsb = intel_dsb_prepare(crtc_state, 1024);
> > if (!crtc_state->dsb)
> > return;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> > index 73d609507f24..3e32aa49b8eb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.c
> > @@ -7,11 +7,16 @@
> > #include "gem/i915_gem_internal.h"
> >
> > #include "i915_drv.h"
> > +#include "i915_irq.h"
> > #include "i915_reg.h"
> > +#include "intel_crtc.h"
> > #include "intel_de.h"
> > #include "intel_display_types.h"
> > #include "intel_dsb.h"
> > #include "intel_dsb_regs.h"
> > +#include "intel_vblank.h"
> > +#include "intel_vrr.h"
> > +#include "skl_watermark.h"
> >
> > struct i915_vma;
> >
> > @@ -47,6 +52,8 @@ struct intel_dsb {
> > * register.
> > */
> > unsigned int ins_start_offset;
> > +
> > + int dewake_scanline;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -297,17 +304,40 @@ static void intel_dsb_align_tail(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
> >
> > void intel_dsb_finish(struct intel_dsb *dsb) {
> > + struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE remains active even after DSB is
> > + * disabled, so make sure to clear it (if set during
> > + * intel_dsb_commit()).
> > + */
> > + intel_dsb_reg_write_masked(dsb, DSB_PMCTRL_2(crtc->pipe, dsb->id),
> > + DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE, 0);
>
> We should also keep DSB_BLOCK_DEWAKE_EXTENSION set to 1, the default .
This is a masked write that doesn't touch that bit.
>
> With this fixed or clarified, this is:
> Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
>
> > intel_dsb_align_tail(dsb);
> > }
> >
> > -/**
> > - * intel_dsb_commit() - Trigger workload execution of DSB.
> > - * @dsb: DSB context
> > - * @wait_for_vblank: wait for vblank before executing
> > - *
> > - * This function is used to do actual write to hardware using DSB.
> > - */
> > -void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb, bool wait_for_vblank)
> > +static int intel_dsb_dewake_scanline(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state) {
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
> > + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state-
> > >hw.adjusted_mode;
> > + unsigned int latency = skl_watermark_max_latency(i915);
> > + int vblank_start;
> > +
> > + if (crtc_state->vrr.enable) {
> > + vblank_start = intel_vrr_vmin_vblank_start(crtc_state);
> > + } else {
> > + vblank_start = adjusted_mode->crtc_vblank_start;
> > +
> > + if (adjusted_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)
> > + vblank_start = DIV_ROUND_UP(vblank_start, 2);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return max(0, vblank_start - intel_usecs_to_scanlines(adjusted_mode,
> > +latency)); }
> > +
> > +static void _intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb, u32 ctrl,
> > + unsigned int dewake_scanline)
> > {
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev); @@ -
> > 325,14 +355,49 @@ void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb, bool
> > wait_for_vblank)
> > }
> >
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSB_CTRL(pipe, dsb->id),
> > - (wait_for_vblank ? DSB_WAIT_FOR_VBLANK : 0) |
> > - DSB_ENABLE);
> > + ctrl | DSB_ENABLE);
> > +
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSB_HEAD(pipe, dsb->id),
> > i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma));
> > +
> > + if (dewake_scanline >= 0) {
> > + int diff, hw_dewake_scanline;
> > +
> > + hw_dewake_scanline = intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw(crtc,
> > +dewake_scanline);
> > +
> > + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSB_PMCTRL(pipe, dsb->id),
> > + DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE |
> > +
> > DSB_SCANLINE_FOR_DEWAKE(hw_dewake_scanline));
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Force DEwake immediately if we're already past
> > + * or close to racing past the target scanline.
> > + */
> > + diff = dewake_scanline - intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
> > + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSB_PMCTRL_2(pipe, dsb->id),
> > + (diff >= 0 && diff < 5 ? DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE :
> > 0) |
> > + DSB_BLOCK_DEWAKE_EXTENSION);
> > + }
> > +
> > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, DSB_TAIL(pipe, dsb->id),
> > i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma) + tail); }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * intel_dsb_commit() - Trigger workload execution of DSB.
> > + * @dsb: DSB context
> > + * @wait_for_vblank: wait for vblank before executing
> > + *
> > + * This function is used to do actual write to hardware using DSB.
> > + */
> > +void intel_dsb_commit(struct intel_dsb *dsb,
> > + bool wait_for_vblank)
> > +{
> > + _intel_dsb_commit(dsb,
> > + wait_for_vblank ? DSB_WAIT_FOR_VBLANK : 0,
> > + wait_for_vblank ? dsb->dewake_scanline : -1); }
> > +
> > void intel_dsb_wait(struct intel_dsb *dsb) {
> > struct intel_crtc *crtc = dsb->crtc;
> > @@ -363,7 +428,7 @@ void intel_dsb_wait(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
> >
> > /**
> > * intel_dsb_prepare() - Allocate, pin and map the DSB command buffer.
> > - * @crtc: the CRTC
> > + * @crtc_state: the CRTC state
> > * @max_cmds: number of commands we need to fit into command buffer
> > *
> > * This function prepare the command buffer which is used to store dsb @@ -
> > 372,9 +437,10 @@ void intel_dsb_wait(struct intel_dsb *dsb)
> > * Returns:
> > * DSB context, NULL on failure
> > */
> > -struct intel_dsb *intel_dsb_prepare(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > +struct intel_dsb *intel_dsb_prepare(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state,
> > unsigned int max_cmds)
> > {
> > + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > @@ -420,6 +486,7 @@ struct intel_dsb *intel_dsb_prepare(struct intel_crtc
> > *crtc,
> > dsb->size = size / 4; /* in dwords */
> > dsb->free_pos = 0;
> > dsb->ins_start_offset = 0;
> > + dsb->dewake_scanline = intel_dsb_dewake_scanline(crtc_state);
> >
> > return dsb;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> > index 54e9e1dc31ee..16d80f434356 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsb.h
> > @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@
> > #include "i915_reg_defs.h"
> >
> > struct intel_crtc;
> > +struct intel_crtc_state;
> > struct intel_dsb;
> >
> > -struct intel_dsb *intel_dsb_prepare(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> > +struct intel_dsb *intel_dsb_prepare(const struct intel_crtc_state
> > +*crtc_state,
> > unsigned int max_cmds);
> > void intel_dsb_finish(struct intel_dsb *dsb); void intel_dsb_cleanup(struct
> > intel_dsb *dsb);
> > --
> > 2.39.3
>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 19:14 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/19] drm/i915: Load LUTs with DSB Ville Syrjala
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/19] drm/i915: Constify LUT entries in checker Ville Syrjala
2023-07-05 9:43 ` Manna, Animesh
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/19] drm/i915/dsb: Use non-locked register access Ville Syrjala
2023-06-08 11:46 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-11 20:22 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-09-12 7:37 ` Jani Nikula
2023-09-12 7:49 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/19] drm/i915/dsb: Dump the DSB command buffer when DSB fails Ville Syrjala
2023-07-11 4:55 ` Manna, Animesh
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/19] drm/i915/dsb: Define more DSB bits Ville Syrjala
2023-09-11 20:32 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/19] drm/i915/dsb: Define the contents of some intstructions bit better Ville Syrjala
2023-09-11 20:50 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-09-27 15:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-09-27 16:16 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/19] drm/i915/dsb: Avoid corrupting the first register write Ville Syrjala
2023-07-05 9:39 ` Manna, Animesh
2023-07-05 9:46 ` Manna, Animesh
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/19] drm/i915/dsb: Don't use indexed writes when byte enables are not all set Ville Syrjala
2023-07-11 5:00 ` Manna, Animesh
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/19] drm/i915/dsb: Introduce intel_dsb_noop() Ville Syrjala
2023-09-11 20:52 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/19] drm/i915/dsb: Introduce intel_dsb_reg_write_masked() Ville Syrjala
2023-09-11 20:55 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/19] drm/i915/dsb: Add support for non-posted DSB registers writes Ville Syrjala
2023-07-11 5:43 ` Manna, Animesh
2023-09-11 21:04 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/19] drm/i915/dsb: Don't use DSB to load the LUTs during full modeset Ville Syrjala
2023-09-11 21:09 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/19] drm/i915/dsb: Load LUTs using the DSB during vblank Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 16:24 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/19] drm/i915/dsb: Use non-posted register writes for legacy LUT Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 17:02 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/19] drm/i915/dsb: Evade transcoder undelayed vblank when using DSB Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 17:13 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/19] drm/i915: Introduce skl_watermark_max_latency() Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 17:25 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 16/19] drm/i915: Introudce intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw() Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 17:37 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/19] drm/i915/dsb: Use DEwake to combat PkgC latency Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 18:08 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-09-27 15:51 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-09-27 16:11 ` Shankar, Uma
2023-06-06 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 18/19] drm/i915/dsb: Re-instate DSB for LUT updates Ville Syrjala
2023-09-13 18:09 ` Shankar, Uma
2025-01-13 19:26 ` Ed Maste
2025-01-17 14:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-06-06 19:15 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 19/19] drm/i915: Do state check for color management changes Ville Syrjala
2023-06-06 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Load LUTs with DSB (rev2) Patchwork
2023-06-06 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-06-06 22:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-06-07 14:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-27 16:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/19] drm/i915: Load LUTs with DSB Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRRPi3iQeFdQrEIL@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox