From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:00:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176297761536.3698.16687933098897289557@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110232017.1475869-36-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Quoting Matt Roper (2025-11-10 20:20:22-03:00)
>Since forcewake uses a reference counting get/put model, there are many
>places where we need to be careful to drop the forcewake reference when
>bailing out of a function early on an error path. Add scope-based
>cleanup options that can be used in place of explicit get/put to help
>prevent mistakes in this area.
>
>Examples:
>
> CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
>
> Obtain forcewake on the XE_FW_GT domain and hold it until the
> end of the current block. The wakeref will be dropped
> automatically when the current scope is exited by any means
> (return, break, reaching the end of the block, etc.).
Looking further down in the patches, I see that fw_ref is only being
used to check for success. I wish there was a way for us to do
something like:
if (xe_force_wake_require(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT))
return; /* ... or whatever that handles the force wake error. */
, but I can't think of a way define such a macro, since we need a
variable in the scope where xe_force_wake_require() would be called for
the cleanup to work properly.
>
> xe_with_force_wake(fw_ref, gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) {
In display code, we usually have with_intel_something(). I wonder if we
should follow suit and use with_xe_force_wake().
> ...
> }
>
> Hold all forcewake domains for the following block. As with the
> CLASS usage, forcewake will be dropped automatically when the
> block is exited by any means.
>
>Use of these cleanup helpers should allow us to remove some ugly
>goto-based error handling and help avoid mistakes in functions with lots
>of early error exits.
>
>v2:
> - Create a separate constructor that just wraps xe_force_wake_get for
> use in the class. This eliminates the need to update the signature
> of xe_force_wake_get(). (Michal)
>
>Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>index 0e3e84bfa51c..0204503b53a0 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>@@ -61,4 +61,32 @@ xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(unsigned int fw_ref, enum xe_force_wake_domains dom
> return fw_ref & domain;
> }
>
>+struct xe_force_wake_ref {
>+ struct xe_force_wake *fw;
>+ unsigned int domains;
>+};
>+
>+static struct xe_force_wake_ref
>+xe_force_wake_constructor(struct xe_force_wake *fw, unsigned int domains)
>+{
>+ struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref = { .fw = fw };
>+
>+ fw_ref.domains = xe_force_wake_get(fw, domains);
>+
>+ return fw_ref;
>+}
>+
>+DEFINE_CLASS(xe_force_wake, struct xe_force_wake_ref,
>+ xe_force_wake_put(_T.fw, _T.domains),
>+ xe_force_wake_constructor(fw, domains),
>+ struct xe_force_wake *fw, unsigned int domains);
>+
>+/*
>+ * Scoped helper for the forcewake class, using the same trick as scoped_guard()
>+ * to bind the lifetime to the next statement/block.
>+ */
>+#define xe_with_force_wake(ref, fw, domains) \
>+ for (CLASS(xe_force_wake, ref)(fw, domains), *done = NULL; \
>+ !done; done = (void *)1)
I think it would be good to use __UNIQUE_ID() for "done" here, to avoid
shadowing any existing variable from the outer scope. We could do it
with something like:
#define xe_with_force_wake(ref, fw, domains, done) \
for (CLASS(xe_force_wake, ref)(fw, domains), *done = NULL; \
!done; done = (void *)1)
#define xe_with_force_wake(ref, fw, domains) \
__xe_with_force_wake(ref, fw, domains, __UNIQUE_ID(done))
--
Gustavo Sousa
>+
> #endif
>--
>2.51.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-12 14:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-12 15:36 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-12 16:11 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 17:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-12 20:00 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-11-12 21:01 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-12 21:16 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-12 19:53 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-12 21:48 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:26 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 22:58 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:00 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 23:28 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:40 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:14 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:25 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:45 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:50 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:51 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:57 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:52 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:54 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:55 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:01 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 18:05 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:09 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:15 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:25 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-11 0:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-11 0:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 16:01 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-13 22:11 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176297761536.3698.16687933098897289557@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox