Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:48:16 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <176298409614.3698.13103653590637000357@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e29041b1-9a0a-4c3d-b761-9c345a0098fa@intel.com>

Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2025-11-12 16:53:46-03:00)
>
>
>On 11/11/2025 12:20 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
>> Add a scope-based helpers for runtime PM that may be used to simplify
>> cleanup logic and potentially avoid goto-based cleanup.
>> 
>> For example, using
>> 
>>         guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
>> 
>
>for the record:
>
>last year [1] use of DEFINE_GUARD for our RPM was considered almost as API abuse ;)
>but now [2] [3] it is used exactly for such scenarios
>
>[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/599366/?series=134955&rev=1
>[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc5/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L617
>[3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc5/source/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h#L191

If something breaks in the future, we are not the only ones to be
blamed? :-)

Maybe we should ask for an ack from people maintaining
include/linux/cleanup.h?

>
>> will get runtime PM and cause a corresponding put to occur automatically
>> when the current scope is exited.  'xe_pm_runtime_noresume' can be used
>> as a guard replacement for the corresponding 'noresume' variant.
>> There's also an xe_pm_runtime_ioctl conditional guard that can be used
>> as a replacement for xe_runtime_ioctl():
>> 
>>         ACQUIRE(xe_pm_runtime_ioctl, pm)(xe);
>>         if ((ret = ACQUIRE_ERR(xe_pm_runtime_ioctl, &pm)) < 0)
>>                 /* failed */
>> 
>> In a few rare cases (such as gt_reset_worker()) we need to ensure that
>> runtime PM is dropped when the function is exited by any means
>> (including error paths), but the function does not need to acquire
>> runtime PM because that has already been done earlier by a different
>> function.  For these special cases, an 'xe_pm_runtime_release_only'
>> guard can be used to handle the release without doing an acquisition.
>> 
>> These guards will be used in future patches to eliminate some of our
>> goto-based cleanup.
>> 
>> v2:
>>  - Specify success condition for xe_pm runtime_ioctl as _RET >= 0 so
>>    that positive values will be properly identified as success and
>>    trigger destructor cleanup properly.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
>> index f7f89a18b6fc..6b27039e7b2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>  #ifndef _XE_PM_H_
>>  #define _XE_PM_H_
>>  
>> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  
>>  #define DEFAULT_VRAM_THRESHOLD 300 /* in MB */
>> @@ -37,4 +38,20 @@ int xe_pm_block_on_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
>>  void xe_pm_might_block_on_suspend(void);
>>  int xe_pm_module_init(void);
>>  
>> +static inline void __xe_pm_runtime_noop(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>> +
>> +DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime, struct xe_device *,
>> +             xe_pm_runtime_get(_T), xe_pm_runtime_put(_T))
>> +DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime_noresume, struct xe_device *,
>> +             xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(_T), xe_pm_runtime_put(_T))
>> +DEFINE_GUARD_COND(xe_pm_runtime, _ioctl, xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(_T), _RET >= 0)

It would also be good to document about these in the kerneldoc for the
get variants.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Used when a function needs to release runtime PM in all possible cases
>> + * and error paths, but the wakeref was already acquired by a different
>> + * function (i.e., get() has already happened so only a put() is needed).
>> + */
>> +DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime_release_only, struct xe_device *,
>> +             __xe_pm_runtime_noop(_T), xe_pm_runtime_put(_T));
>
>maybe instead defining the noop() helper, we can just skip this param:
>
>DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime_release_only, struct xe_device *, , xe_pm_runtime_put(_T));
>
>> +
>>  #endif
>
>either way,
>
>Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-12 14:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-12 15:36   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-12 16:11   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 17:10   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-12 20:00   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-12 21:01     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-12 21:16     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-12 19:53   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-12 21:48     ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:26   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 22:58     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:39   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:00   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 23:28     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:37   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:40   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:14   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:25   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:39   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:45   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:50   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:51   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:57   ` [PATCH v2.1 " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:52     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:54   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:55   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:01   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 18:05     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:09   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:15   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:25   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-11  0:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-11  0:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 16:01   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-13 22:11 ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=176298409614.3698.13103653590637000357@intel.com \
    --to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox