From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:48:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176298409614.3698.13103653590637000357@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e29041b1-9a0a-4c3d-b761-9c345a0098fa@intel.com>
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2025-11-12 16:53:46-03:00)
>
>
>On 11/11/2025 12:20 AM, Matt Roper wrote:
>> Add a scope-based helpers for runtime PM that may be used to simplify
>> cleanup logic and potentially avoid goto-based cleanup.
>>
>> For example, using
>>
>> guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
>>
>
>for the record:
>
>last year [1] use of DEFINE_GUARD for our RPM was considered almost as API abuse ;)
>but now [2] [3] it is used exactly for such scenarios
>
>[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/599366/?series=134955&rev=1
>[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc5/source/include/linux/pm_runtime.h#L617
>[3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18-rc5/source/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h#L191
If something breaks in the future, we are not the only ones to be
blamed? :-)
Maybe we should ask for an ack from people maintaining
include/linux/cleanup.h?
>
>> will get runtime PM and cause a corresponding put to occur automatically
>> when the current scope is exited. 'xe_pm_runtime_noresume' can be used
>> as a guard replacement for the corresponding 'noresume' variant.
>> There's also an xe_pm_runtime_ioctl conditional guard that can be used
>> as a replacement for xe_runtime_ioctl():
>>
>> ACQUIRE(xe_pm_runtime_ioctl, pm)(xe);
>> if ((ret = ACQUIRE_ERR(xe_pm_runtime_ioctl, &pm)) < 0)
>> /* failed */
>>
>> In a few rare cases (such as gt_reset_worker()) we need to ensure that
>> runtime PM is dropped when the function is exited by any means
>> (including error paths), but the function does not need to acquire
>> runtime PM because that has already been done earlier by a different
>> function. For these special cases, an 'xe_pm_runtime_release_only'
>> guard can be used to handle the release without doing an acquisition.
>>
>> These guards will be used in future patches to eliminate some of our
>> goto-based cleanup.
>>
>> v2:
>> - Specify success condition for xe_pm runtime_ioctl as _RET >= 0 so
>> that positive values will be properly identified as success and
>> trigger destructor cleanup properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
>> index f7f89a18b6fc..6b27039e7b2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pm.h
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>> #ifndef _XE_PM_H_
>> #define _XE_PM_H_
>>
>> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>
>> #define DEFAULT_VRAM_THRESHOLD 300 /* in MB */
>> @@ -37,4 +38,20 @@ int xe_pm_block_on_suspend(struct xe_device *xe);
>> void xe_pm_might_block_on_suspend(void);
>> int xe_pm_module_init(void);
>>
>> +static inline void __xe_pm_runtime_noop(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>> +
>> +DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime, struct xe_device *,
>> + xe_pm_runtime_get(_T), xe_pm_runtime_put(_T))
>> +DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime_noresume, struct xe_device *,
>> + xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(_T), xe_pm_runtime_put(_T))
>> +DEFINE_GUARD_COND(xe_pm_runtime, _ioctl, xe_pm_runtime_get_ioctl(_T), _RET >= 0)
It would also be good to document about these in the kerneldoc for the
get variants.
--
Gustavo Sousa
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Used when a function needs to release runtime PM in all possible cases
>> + * and error paths, but the wakeref was already acquired by a different
>> + * function (i.e., get() has already happened so only a put() is needed).
>> + */
>> +DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime_release_only, struct xe_device *,
>> + __xe_pm_runtime_noop(_T), xe_pm_runtime_put(_T));
>
>maybe instead defining the noop() helper, we can just skip this param:
>
>DEFINE_GUARD(xe_pm_runtime_release_only, struct xe_device *, , xe_pm_runtime_put(_T));
>
>> +
>> #endif
>
>either way,
>
>Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-12 14:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-12 15:36 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-12 16:11 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 17:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-12 20:00 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-12 21:01 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-12 21:16 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-12 19:53 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-12 21:48 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:26 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 22:58 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:00 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 23:28 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:40 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:14 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:25 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:45 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:50 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:51 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:57 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:52 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:54 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:55 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:01 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 18:05 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:09 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:15 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:25 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-11 0:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-11 0:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 16:01 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-13 22:11 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176298409614.3698.13103653590637000357@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox