Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:25:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <176304394887.3698.6245959522925522278@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110232017.1475869-48-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

Quoting Matt Roper (2025-11-10 20:20:34-03:00)
>Eliminate some goto-based cleanup by utilizing scoped cleanup helpers.
>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c   | 23 +++++++++-------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c | 25 ++++++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
>index 1fd4a815e784..6a935a75f2a4 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_fb_pin.c
>@@ -210,10 +210,11 @@ static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>         /* TODO: Consider sharing framebuffer mapping?
>          * embed i915_vma inside intel_framebuffer
>          */
>-        xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
>-        ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&ggtt->lock);
>+        guard(xe_pm_runtime_noresume)(xe);
>+        ACQUIRE(mutex_intr, lock)(&ggtt->lock);
>+        ret = ACQUIRE_ERR(mutex_intr, &lock);
>         if (ret)
>-                goto out;
>+                return ret;
> 
>         align = XE_PAGE_SIZE;
>         if (xe_bo_is_vram(bo) && ggtt->flags & XE_GGTT_FLAGS_64K)
>@@ -223,15 +224,13 @@ static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>                 vma->node = bo->ggtt_node[tile0->id];
>         } else if (view->type == I915_GTT_VIEW_NORMAL) {
>                 vma->node = xe_ggtt_node_init(ggtt);
>-                if (IS_ERR(vma->node)) {
>-                        ret = PTR_ERR(vma->node);
>-                        goto out_unlock;
>-                }
>+                if (IS_ERR(vma->node))
>+                        return PTR_ERR(vma->node);
> 
>                 ret = xe_ggtt_node_insert_locked(vma->node, xe_bo_size(bo), align, 0);
>                 if (ret) {
>                         xe_ggtt_node_fini(vma->node);
>-                        goto out_unlock;
>+                        return ret;
>                 }
> 
>                 xe_ggtt_map_bo(ggtt, vma->node, bo, xe->pat.idx[XE_CACHE_NONE]);
>@@ -245,13 +244,13 @@ static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>                 vma->node = xe_ggtt_node_init(ggtt);
>                 if (IS_ERR(vma->node)) {
>                         ret = PTR_ERR(vma->node);
>-                        goto out_unlock;
>+                        return ret;
>                 }
> 
>                 ret = xe_ggtt_node_insert_locked(vma->node, size, align, 0);
>                 if (ret) {
>                         xe_ggtt_node_fini(vma->node);
>-                        goto out_unlock;
>+                        return ret;
>                 }
> 
>                 ggtt_ofs = vma->node->base.start;
>@@ -265,10 +264,6 @@ static int __xe_pin_fb_vma_ggtt(const struct intel_framebuffer *fb,
>                                            rot_info->plane[i].dst_stride);
>         }
> 
>-out_unlock:
>-        mutex_unlock(&ggtt->lock);
>-out:
>-        xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>         return ret;
> }
> 
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>index 4ae847b628e2..084baddb160e 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_hdcp_gsc.c
>@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ bool intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status(struct drm_device *drm)
>         struct xe_gt *gt = tile->media_gt;
>         struct xe_gsc *gsc = &gt->uc.gsc;
>         bool ret = true;
>-        unsigned int fw_ref;
> 
>         if (!gsc || !xe_uc_fw_is_enabled(&gsc->fw)) {
>                 drm_dbg_kms(&xe->drm,
>@@ -45,21 +44,17 @@ bool intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status(struct drm_device *drm)
>                 return false;
>         }
> 
>-        xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
>-        fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
>-        if (!fw_ref) {
>+        guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
>+        CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GSC);
>+        if (!fw_ref.domains) {
>                 drm_dbg_kms(&xe->drm,
>                             "failed to get forcewake to check proxy status\n");
>-                ret = false;
>-                goto out;
>+                return false;
>         }
> 
>         if (!xe_gsc_proxy_init_done(gsc))
>                 ret = false;

We don't need ret anymore, right?

I think we can just return xe_gsc_proxy_init_done(gsc).

> 
>-        xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), fw_ref);
>-out:
>-        xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>         return ret;
> }
> 
>@@ -166,17 +161,15 @@ ssize_t intel_hdcp_gsc_msg_send(struct intel_hdcp_gsc_context *gsc_context,
>         u32 addr_out_off, addr_in_wr_off = 0;
>         int ret, tries = 0;
> 
>-        if (msg_in_len > max_msg_size || msg_out_len > max_msg_size) {
>-                ret = -ENOSPC;
>-                goto out;
>-        }
>+        if (msg_in_len > max_msg_size || msg_out_len > max_msg_size)
>+                return -ENOSPC;

Huh.. Did we just fix a bug in this function?

It appears this function was putting without getting when the "if"
condition evaluates to true.

--
Gustavo Sousa

> 
>         msg_size_in = msg_in_len + HDCP_GSC_HEADER_SIZE;
>         msg_size_out = msg_out_len + HDCP_GSC_HEADER_SIZE;
>         addr_out_off = PAGE_SIZE;
> 
>         host_session_id = xe_gsc_create_host_session_id();
>-        xe_pm_runtime_get_noresume(xe);
>+        guard(xe_pm_runtime_noresume)(xe);
>         addr_in_wr_off = xe_gsc_emit_header(xe, &gsc_context->hdcp_bo->vmap,
>                                             addr_in_wr_off, HECI_MEADDRESS_HDCP,
>                                             host_session_id, msg_in_len);
>@@ -201,13 +194,11 @@ ssize_t intel_hdcp_gsc_msg_send(struct intel_hdcp_gsc_context *gsc_context,
>         } while (++tries < 20);
> 
>         if (ret)
>-                goto out;
>+                return ret;
> 
>         xe_map_memcpy_from(xe, msg_out, &gsc_context->hdcp_bo->vmap,
>                            addr_out_off + HDCP_GSC_HEADER_SIZE,
>                            msg_out_len);
> 
>-out:
>-        xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>         return ret;
> }
>-- 
>2.51.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-13 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-12 14:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-12 15:36   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-12 16:11   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 17:10   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-12 20:00   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-12 21:01     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-12 21:16     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-12 19:53   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-12 21:48     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:26   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 22:58     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:39   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:00   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 23:28     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:37   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:40   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:14   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:25   ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:39   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:45   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:50   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:51   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:57   ` [PATCH v2.1 " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:52     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:54   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:55   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:01   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 18:05     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:09   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:15   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:25   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-11  0:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-11  0:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 16:01   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-13 22:11 ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=176304394887.3698.6245959522925522278@intel.com \
    --to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox