Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine()
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 15:20:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110232017.1475869-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110232017.1475869-32-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

force_wake_get_any_engine() is a single-use function to pick any engine
present on the platform and grab its forcewake.  The signature
(returning a boolean success and both the engine pointer and a forcewake
ref by reference) is a bit awkward.  Rewrite it such that the
forcewake ref is the function's return value and the caller can
determine success/failure by checking the engine pointer against NULL.

With this new signature, the function can serve as a scoped cleanup
class constructor, so define the corresponding class.  Note that if we
fail to obtain forcewake (or if the platform somehow has no engines),
the constructor can fail, returning an invalid fw_ref.  In such cases,
fw_ref.fw will be NULL, making it clear that the reference is invalid;
this fact can be used to create a thin wrapper around xe_force_wake_put
that can be used as a destructor for this class.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
index f931ff9b1ec0..9deb258ba204 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_client.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 
 #include <drm/drm_print.h>
 #include <uapi/drm/xe_drm.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
@@ -285,34 +286,48 @@ static struct xe_hw_engine *any_engine(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static bool force_wake_get_any_engine(struct xe_device *xe,
-				      struct xe_hw_engine **phwe,
-				      unsigned int *pfw_ref)
+/*
+ * Pick any engine and grab its forcewake.  On error phwe will be NULL and
+ * the returned forcewake reference will be invalid.  Callers should check
+ * phwe against NULL.
+ */
+static struct xe_force_wake_ref force_wake_get_any_engine(struct xe_device *xe,
+							  struct xe_hw_engine **phwe)
 {
 	enum xe_force_wake_domains domain;
-	unsigned int fw_ref;
+	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref = {};
 	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
-	struct xe_force_wake *fw;
+
+	*phwe = NULL;
 
 	hwe = any_engine(xe);
 	if (!hwe)
-		return false;
+		return fw_ref;	/* will be invalid */
 
 	domain = xe_hw_engine_to_fw_domain(hwe);
-	fw = gt_to_fw(hwe->gt);
 
-	fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(fw, domain);
-	if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, domain)) {
-		xe_force_wake_put(fw, fw_ref);
-		return false;
-	}
+	fw_ref.fw = gt_to_fw(hwe->gt);
+	fw_ref.domains = xe_force_wake_get(fw_ref.fw, domain);
+	if (xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, domain))
+		*phwe = hwe;	/* valid forcewake */
 
-	*phwe = hwe;
-	*pfw_ref = fw_ref;
+	return fw_ref;
+}
 
-	return true;
+static void drop_fw_if_valid(struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If force_wake_get_any_engine() fails, there's no real forcewake
+	 * reference to drop, and fw_ref.fw will be NULL.
+	 */
+	if (fw_ref.fw)
+		xe_force_wake_put(fw_ref.fw, fw_ref.domains);
 }
 
+DEFINE_CLASS(xe_force_wake_any_engine, struct xe_force_wake_ref,
+	     drop_fw_if_valid(_T), force_wake_get_any_engine(xe, phwe),
+	     struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_hw_engine **phwe);
+
 static void show_run_ticks(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
 {
 	unsigned long class, i, gt_id, capacity[XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX] = { };
@@ -322,7 +337,7 @@ static void show_run_ticks(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
 	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
 	struct xe_exec_queue *q;
 	u64 gpu_timestamp;
-	unsigned int fw_ref;
+	struct xe_force_wake_ref fw_ref;
 
 	/*
 	 * RING_TIMESTAMP registers are inaccessible in VF mode.
@@ -340,7 +355,8 @@ static void show_run_ticks(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
 		       !atomic_read(&xef->exec_queue.pending_removal));
 
 	xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
-	if (!force_wake_get_any_engine(xe, &hwe, &fw_ref)) {
+	fw_ref = force_wake_get_any_engine(xe, &hwe);
+	if (!hwe) {
 		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -360,7 +376,7 @@ static void show_run_ticks(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
 
 	gpu_timestamp = xe_hw_engine_read_timestamp(hwe);
 
-	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(hwe->gt), fw_ref);
+	xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(hwe->gt), fw_ref.domains);
 	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
 
 	for (class = 0; class < XE_ENGINE_CLASS_MAX; class++) {
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-10 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-12 14:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-12 15:36   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-12 16:11   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 17:10   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-12 20:00   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-12 21:01     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-12 21:16     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-12 19:53   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-12 21:48     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:26   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 22:58     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:39   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:00   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 23:28     ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:37   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:40   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:14   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:25   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2025-11-13 17:39   ` [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:45   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:50   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:51   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:57   ` [PATCH v2.1 " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:52     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:54   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:55   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:01   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 18:05     ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:09   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:15   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:25   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:30   ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-11  0:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-11  0:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 16:01   ` Matt Roper
2025-11-13 22:11 ` Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251110232017.1475869-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox