From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: Use scope-based cleanup
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 11:14:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176304324487.3698.16197271036502887154@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110232017.1475869-47-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Quoting Matt Roper (2025-11-10 20:20:33-03:00)
>Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM in the devcoredump
>code. This eliminates some goto-based error handling and slightly
>simplifies other functions.
>
>Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
>index 203e3038cc81..599c886c865b 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
>@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ static void xe_devcoredump_deferred_snap_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss = container_of(work, typeof(*ss), work);
> struct xe_devcoredump *coredump = container_of(ss, typeof(*coredump), snapshot);
> struct xe_device *xe = coredump_to_xe(coredump);
>- unsigned int fw_ref;
>
> /*
> * NB: Despite passing a GFP_ flags parameter here, more allocations are done
>@@ -287,15 +286,15 @@ static void xe_devcoredump_deferred_snap_work(struct work_struct *work)
> xe_devcoredump_read, xe_devcoredump_free,
> XE_COREDUMP_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES);
>
>- xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
>+ guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe);
>
> /* keep going if fw fails as we still want to save the memory and SW data */
>- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>- if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL))
>- xe_gt_info(ss->gt, "failed to get forcewake for coredump capture\n");
>- xe_vm_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->vm);
>- xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->ge);
>- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(ss->gt), fw_ref);
>+ xe_with_force_wake(fw_ref, gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) {
>+ if (!xe_force_wake_ref_has_domain(fw_ref.domains, XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL))
>+ xe_gt_info(ss->gt, "failed to get forcewake for coredump capture\n");
>+ xe_vm_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->vm);
>+ xe_guc_exec_queue_snapshot_capture_delayed(ss->ge);
>+ }
>
> ss->read.chunk_position = 0;
>
>@@ -306,7 +305,7 @@ static void xe_devcoredump_deferred_snap_work(struct work_struct *work)
> ss->read.buffer = kvmalloc(XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX,
> GFP_USER);
> if (!ss->read.buffer)
>- goto put_pm;
>+ return;
>
> __xe_devcoredump_read(ss->read.buffer,
> XE_DEVCOREDUMP_CHUNK_MAX,
>@@ -314,15 +313,12 @@ static void xe_devcoredump_deferred_snap_work(struct work_struct *work)
> } else {
> ss->read.buffer = kvmalloc(ss->read.size, GFP_USER);
> if (!ss->read.buffer)
>- goto put_pm;
>+ return;
>
> __xe_devcoredump_read(ss->read.buffer, ss->read.size, 0,
> coredump);
> xe_devcoredump_snapshot_free(ss);
> }
>-
>-put_pm:
>- xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> }
>
> static void devcoredump_snapshot(struct xe_devcoredump *coredump,
>@@ -332,7 +328,6 @@ static void devcoredump_snapshot(struct xe_devcoredump *coredump,
> struct xe_devcoredump_snapshot *ss = &coredump->snapshot;
> struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> const char *process_name = "no process";
>- unsigned int fw_ref;
> bool cookie;
>
> ss->snapshot_time = ktime_get_real();
>@@ -351,7 +346,7 @@ static void devcoredump_snapshot(struct xe_devcoredump *coredump,
> cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
>
> /* keep going if fw fails as we still want to save the memory and SW data */
>- fw_ref = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(q->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>+ CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(q->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL);
Should we move this to happen before dma_fence_begin_signalling(), just
so we keep the LIFO cleanup order at the end of the function?
--
Gustavo Sousa
>
> ss->guc.log = xe_guc_log_snapshot_capture(&guc->log, true);
> ss->guc.ct = xe_guc_ct_snapshot_capture(&guc->ct);
>@@ -364,7 +359,6 @@ static void devcoredump_snapshot(struct xe_devcoredump *coredump,
>
> queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &ss->work);
>
>- xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(q->gt), fw_ref);
> dma_fence_end_signalling(cookie);
> }
>
>--
>2.51.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 23:20 [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Improve kerneldoc Matt Roper
2025-11-12 14:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] drm/xe/eustall: Store forcewake reference in stream structure Matt Roper
2025-11-12 15:36 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] drm/xe/oa: " Matt Roper
2025-11-12 16:11 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 17:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-12 20:00 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-12 21:01 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-12 21:16 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-12 19:53 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-11-12 21:48 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:26 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 22:58 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] drm/xe/gt_idle: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] drm/xe/guc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 12:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] drm/xe/guc_pc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:00 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] drm/xe/mocs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 23:28 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:37 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:40 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] drm/xe/gsc: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 13:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] drm/xe/device: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:04 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] drm/xe/devcoredump: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:14 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-13 14:25 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] drm/xe: Create scoped cleanup class for force_wake_get_any_engine() Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:39 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanup Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] drm/xe/gt_debugfs: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:45 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewake Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:46 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] drm/xe/query: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:50 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] drm/xe/reg_sr: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:51 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] drm/xe/vram: " Matt Roper
2025-11-10 23:57 ` [PATCH v2.1 " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:52 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] drm/xe/bo: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:54 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] drm/xe/ggtt: Use scope-based runtime pm Matt Roper
2025-11-13 17:55 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] drm/xe/hwmon: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:01 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-13 18:05 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] drm/xe/sriov: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:09 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] drm/xe/tests: " Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:15 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] drm/xe/sysfs: Use scope-based runtime power management Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:25 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-10 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] drm/xe/debugfs: Use scope-based runtime PM Matt Roper
2025-11-13 18:30 ` Gustavo Sousa
2025-11-11 0:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM (rev3) Patchwork
2025-11-11 0:57 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:50 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] Scope-based forcewake and runtime PM Jani Nikula
2025-11-12 16:01 ` Matt Roper
2025-11-13 22:11 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176304324487.3698.16197271036502887154@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox