Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/9] cxl/acpi: Register CXL host ports by bridge device
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:22:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6372a399b3400_12cdff2945b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221109104059.766720-2-rrichter@amd.com>

Robert Richter wrote:
> A port of a CXL host bridge links to the bridge's acpi device
> (&adev->dev) with its corresponding uport/dport device (uport_dev and
> dport_dev respectively). The device is not a direct parent device in
> the PCI topology as pdev->dev.parent points to a PCI bridge's (struct
> pci_host_bridge) device. The following CXL memory device hierarchy
> would be valid for an endpoint once an RCD EP would be enabled (note
> this will be done in a later patch):
> 
> VH mode:
> 
>  cxlmd->dev.parent->parent
>         ^^^\^^^^^^\ ^^^^^^\
>             \      \       pci_dev (Type 1, Downstream Port)
>              \      pci_dev (Type 0, PCI Express Endpoint)
>               cxl mem device
> 
> RCD mode:
> 
>  cxlmd->dev.parent->parent
>         ^^^\^^^^^^\ ^^^^^^\
>             \      \       pci_host_bridge
>              \      pci_dev (Type 0, RCiEP)
>               cxl mem device
> 
> In VH mode a downstream port is created by port enumeration and thus
> always exists.
> 
> Now, in RCD mode the host bridge also already exists but it references
> to an ACPI device. A port lookup by the PCI device's parent device
> will fail as a direct link to the registered port is missing. The ACPI
> device of the bridge must be determined first.
> 
> To prevent this, change port registration of a CXL host to use the
> bridge device instead. Do this also for the VH case as port topology
> will better reflect the PCI topology then.
> 
> If a mock device is registered by a test driver, the bridge pointer
> can be NULL. Keep using the matching ACPI device (&adev->dev) as a
> fallback in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index fb9f72813067..06150c953f58 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,17 @@ __mock struct acpi_device *to_cxl_host_bridge(struct device *host,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct acpi_pci_root *to_cxl_pci_root(struct device *host,
> +						    struct device *match)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_device *adev = to_cxl_host_bridge(host, match);
> +
> +	if (!adev)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	return acpi_pci_find_root(adev->handle);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * A host bridge is a dport to a CFMWS decode and it is a uport to the
>   * dport (PCIe Root Ports) in the host bridge.
> @@ -193,35 +204,35 @@ static int add_host_bridge_uport(struct device *match, void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct cxl_port *root_port = arg;
>  	struct device *host = root_port->dev.parent;
> -	struct acpi_device *bridge = to_cxl_host_bridge(host, match);
> -	struct acpi_pci_root *pci_root;
> +	struct acpi_pci_root *pci_root = to_cxl_pci_root(host, match);
>  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>  	struct cxl_port *port;
> +	struct device *bridge;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	if (!bridge)
> +	if (!pci_root)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(root_port, match);
> +	/*
> +	 * If it is a mock dev, the bridge can be NULL, use matching
> +	 * device (&adev->dev) as a fallback then then.
> +	 */
> +	bridge = pci_root->bus->bridge ?: match;

While I appreciate that you ran this against the unit tests, production
code should not know or care about the presence of mock devices. So,
this was showing a gap in the mock implementation, now addressed here:

http://lore.kernel.org/r/166845667383.1449826.14492184009399164787.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com

With that, this approach can be simplified to the following:

-- >8 --
From 3cb7a46e100d016132727ad32904b629061e40d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:20:27 -0800
Subject: [PATCH v4] cxl/acpi: Register CXL host ports by bridge device

A port of a CXL host bridge links to the bridge's acpi device
(&adev->dev) with its corresponding uport/dport device (uport_dev and
dport_dev respectively). The device is not a direct parent device in
the PCI topology as pdev->dev.parent points to a PCI bridge's (struct
pci_host_bridge) device. The following CXL memory device hierarchy
would be valid for an endpoint once an RCD EP would be enabled (note
this will be done in a later patch):

VH mode:

 cxlmd->dev.parent->parent
        ^^^\^^^^^^\ ^^^^^^\
            \      \       pci_dev (Type 1, Downstream Port)
             \      pci_dev (Type 0, PCI Express Endpoint)
              cxl mem device

RCD mode:

 cxlmd->dev.parent->parent
        ^^^\^^^^^^\ ^^^^^^\
            \      \       pci_host_bridge
             \      pci_dev (Type 0, RCiEP)
              cxl mem device

In VH mode a downstream port is created by port enumeration and thus
always exists.

Now, in RCD mode the host bridge also already exists but it references
to an ACPI device. A port lookup by the PCI device's parent device
will fail as a direct link to the registered port is missing. The ACPI
device of the bridge must be determined first.

To prevent this, change port registration of a CXL host to use the
bridge device instead. Do this also for the VH case as port topology
will better reflect the PCI topology then.

Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
index fb9f72813067..71f8bdedd676 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
@@ -193,35 +193,34 @@ static int add_host_bridge_uport(struct device *match, void *arg)
 {
 	struct cxl_port *root_port = arg;
 	struct device *host = root_port->dev.parent;
-	struct acpi_device *bridge = to_cxl_host_bridge(host, match);
+	struct acpi_device *hb = to_cxl_host_bridge(host, match);
 	struct acpi_pci_root *pci_root;
 	struct cxl_dport *dport;
 	struct cxl_port *port;
+	struct device *bridge;
 	int rc;
 
-	if (!bridge)
+	if (!hb)
 		return 0;
 
-	dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(root_port, match);
+	pci_root = acpi_pci_find_root(hb->handle);
+	bridge = pci_root->bus->bridge;
+	dport = cxl_find_dport_by_dev(root_port, bridge);
 	if (!dport) {
 		dev_dbg(host, "host bridge expected and not found\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Note that this lookup already succeeded in
-	 * to_cxl_host_bridge(), so no need to check for failure here
-	 */
-	pci_root = acpi_pci_find_root(bridge->handle);
-	rc = devm_cxl_register_pci_bus(host, match, pci_root->bus);
+	rc = devm_cxl_register_pci_bus(host, bridge, pci_root->bus);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 
-	port = devm_cxl_add_port(host, match, dport->component_reg_phys, dport);
+	port = devm_cxl_add_port(host, bridge, dport->component_reg_phys,
+				 dport);
 	if (IS_ERR(port))
 		return PTR_ERR(port);
 
-	dev_info(pci_root->bus->bridge, "host supports CXL\n");
+	dev_info(bridge, "host supports CXL\n");
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -253,18 +252,20 @@ static int cxl_get_chbcr(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
 static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
 {
 	acpi_status status;
+	struct device *bridge;
 	unsigned long long uid;
 	struct cxl_dport *dport;
 	struct cxl_chbs_context ctx;
+	struct acpi_pci_root *pci_root;
 	struct cxl_port *root_port = arg;
 	struct device *host = root_port->dev.parent;
-	struct acpi_device *bridge = to_cxl_host_bridge(host, match);
+	struct acpi_device *hb = to_cxl_host_bridge(host, match);
 
-	if (!bridge)
+	if (!hb)
 		return 0;
 
-	status = acpi_evaluate_integer(bridge->handle, METHOD_NAME__UID, NULL,
-				       &uid);
+	status =
+		acpi_evaluate_integer(hb->handle, METHOD_NAME__UID, NULL, &uid);
 	if (status != AE_OK) {
 		dev_err(match, "unable to retrieve _UID\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -285,7 +286,9 @@ static int add_host_bridge_dport(struct device *match, void *arg)
 
 	dev_dbg(match, "CHBCR found: 0x%08llx\n", (u64)ctx.chbcr);
 
-	dport = devm_cxl_add_dport(root_port, match, uid, ctx.chbcr);
+	pci_root = acpi_pci_find_root(hb->handle);
+	bridge = pci_root->bus->bridge;
+	dport = devm_cxl_add_dport(root_port, bridge, uid, ctx.chbcr);
 	if (IS_ERR(dport))
 		return PTR_ERR(dport);
 
-- 
2.38.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-14 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 10:40 [PATCH v3 0/9] cxl: Add support for Restricted CXL hosts (RCD mode) Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] cxl/acpi: Register CXL host ports by bridge device Robert Richter
2022-11-09 23:11   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-14 20:22   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2022-11-15 10:37     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] cxl/acpi: Extract component registers of restricted hosts from RCRB Robert Richter
2022-11-14 21:30   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 12:17     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 17:54       ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 12:43         ` Robert Richter
2022-11-17 17:20           ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 18:25             ` Robert Richter
2022-11-17 19:23               ` Dan Williams
2022-11-18  8:12                 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] cxl/mem: Adjust cxl_mem_find_port() to find an RCH's port Robert Richter
2022-11-14 23:45   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 13:12     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 18:06       ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 18:13         ` Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] cxl/mem: Skip intermediate port enumeration of restricted endpoints (RCDs) Robert Richter
2022-11-09 16:55   ` Dave Jiang
2022-11-15  0:07   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 13:17     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 18:08       ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 18:46         ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15  0:24   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 13:28     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 18:09       ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] cxl/pci: Only register RCDs with device 0, function 0 as CXL memory device Robert Richter
2022-11-16 19:24   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 15:56     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-17 17:27       ` Dan Williams
2022-11-18  8:27         ` Robert Richter
2022-11-18 16:55           ` Dan Williams
2022-11-18 19:53             ` Robert Richter
2022-11-18 20:30               ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] cxl/pci: Do not ignore PCI config read errors in match_add_dports() Robert Richter
2022-11-09 23:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-11 11:56     ` Robert Richter
2022-11-11 12:07       ` Robert Richter
2022-11-16 19:36   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] cxl/pci: Factor out code in match_add_dports() to pci_dev_add_dport() Robert Richter
2022-11-16 19:37   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] cxl/pci: Extend devm_cxl_port_enumerate_dports() to support restricted hosts (RCH) Robert Richter
2022-11-11 11:59   ` Robert Richter
2022-11-16 20:55   ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] cxl/acpi: Set ACPI's CXL _OSC to indicate CXL1.1 support Robert Richter
2022-11-09 12:22   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 23:35   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-10  0:51     ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-11-10 17:10       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-10 19:43     ` Terry Bowman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6372a399b3400_12cdff2945b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rrichter@amd.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox