From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] cxl/acpi: Extract component registers of restricted hosts from RCRB
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ODbwk+12JvWyhJ@rric.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6372b35953580_12cdff294b7@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
On 14.11.22 13:30:01, Dan Williams wrote:
> Robert Richter wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> > index ec178e69b18f..7a5bde81e949 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/regs.c
> > @@ -307,3 +307,49 @@ int cxl_find_regblock(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_find_regblock, CXL);
> > +
> > +resource_size_t cxl_rcrb_to_component(struct device *dev,
> > + resource_size_t rcrb,
> > + enum cxl_rcrb which)
> > +{
> > + resource_size_t component_reg_phys;
> > + u32 bar0, bar1;
> > + void *addr;
> > +
> > + if (which == CXL_RCRB_UPSTREAM)
> > + rcrb += SZ_4K;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to component block containing CXL
> > + * subsystem component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows
> > + * the PCI Base spec here, esp. 64 bit extraction and memory
> > + * ranges alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1).
> > + */
>
> A request_mem_region() is needed here to ensure ownership and expected
> sequencing of accessing the RCRB to locate the component registers, and
> accessing the RCRB to manipulate the component registers. It also helps
> to sanity check that the BIOS mapped an exclusive range for the RCRB.
Right, that is missing.
>
> > + addr = ioremap(rcrb, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + SZ_8);
>
> That PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 does not belong there. It ends up being benign
> and forcing ioremap to map 12K instead of 8K, but it is a
> config-register offset, not part of the RCRB size.
Note this is BAR0 + 8 bytes, not 8k, and it does not map the whole
RCRB region but instead the first part of the config space up to
including the 64 bit BAR.
>
> > + if (!addr) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to map region %pr\n", addr);
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + bar0 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> > + bar1 = readl(addr + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1);
> > + iounmap(addr);
>
> ...corresponding release_mem_region() would go here.
>
> > +
> > + /* sanity check */
> > + if (bar0 & (PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_1M | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO))
> > + return CXL_RESOURCE_NONE;
>
> I would have also expected:
>
> - a sanity check for "Memory Space Enable" being set in the command
> register.
Ok.
>
> - an explicit check for 0xffffffff for the case when the upstream-port
> implements "no RCRB" mode.
Yes, I left support for this to a later patch, but it's better to
check it here already and possibly fall back to reg loc DVSEC then.
>
> - some check that BIOS initialized the BAR values post reset given these
> BARs are invisible to the PCI core resource assignment
What check do you have in mind here? There is already the NULL check
which would be the out-of-reset value.
Thanks,
-Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-15 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-09 10:40 [PATCH v3 0/9] cxl: Add support for Restricted CXL hosts (RCD mode) Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] cxl/acpi: Register CXL host ports by bridge device Robert Richter
2022-11-09 23:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-14 20:22 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 10:37 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] cxl/acpi: Extract component registers of restricted hosts from RCRB Robert Richter
2022-11-14 21:30 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 12:17 ` Robert Richter [this message]
2022-11-15 17:54 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 12:43 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-17 17:20 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 18:25 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-17 19:23 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-18 8:12 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] cxl/mem: Adjust cxl_mem_find_port() to find an RCH's port Robert Richter
2022-11-14 23:45 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 13:12 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 18:06 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 18:13 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] cxl/mem: Skip intermediate port enumeration of restricted endpoints (RCDs) Robert Richter
2022-11-09 16:55 ` Dave Jiang
2022-11-15 0:07 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 13:17 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 18:08 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 18:46 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 0:24 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-15 13:28 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-15 18:09 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] cxl/pci: Only register RCDs with device 0, function 0 as CXL memory device Robert Richter
2022-11-16 19:24 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-17 15:56 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-17 17:27 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-18 8:27 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-18 16:55 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-18 19:53 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-18 20:30 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] cxl/pci: Do not ignore PCI config read errors in match_add_dports() Robert Richter
2022-11-09 23:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-11 11:56 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-11 12:07 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-16 19:36 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] cxl/pci: Factor out code in match_add_dports() to pci_dev_add_dport() Robert Richter
2022-11-16 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] cxl/pci: Extend devm_cxl_port_enumerate_dports() to support restricted hosts (RCH) Robert Richter
2022-11-11 11:59 ` Robert Richter
2022-11-16 20:55 ` Dan Williams
2022-11-09 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] cxl/acpi: Set ACPI's CXL _OSC to indicate CXL1.1 support Robert Richter
2022-11-09 12:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-11-09 23:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-10 0:51 ` Verma, Vishal L
2022-11-10 17:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-10 19:43 ` Terry Bowman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3ODbwk+12JvWyhJ@rric.localdomain \
--to=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox