Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically initialize iio_chan_spec data
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:04:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55cf525d734878369f936834cca60ce7972d268a.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQOVcCinTd-ZJJX3@lore-desk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5494 bytes --]

On Thu, 2025-10-30 at 17:42 +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Using the ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL_ACC() macro as a static initializer
> > for the iio_chan_spec struct arrays makes all sensors advertise
> > channel event capabilities regardless of whether they actually
> > support event generation. And if userspace tries to configure
> > accelerometer wakeup events on a sensor device that does not
> > support them (e.g. LSM6DS0), st_lsm6dsx_write_event() dereferences
> > a NULL pointer when trying to write to the wakeup register.
> > Replace usage of the ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL_ACC() and
> > ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL() macros with dynamic allocation and
> > initialization of struct iio_chan_spec arrays, where the
> > st_lsm6dsx_event structure is only used for sensors that support
> > wakeup events; besides fixing the above bug, this serves as a
> > preliminary step for adding support for more event types.
> 
> I agree we are missing the Fixes tag here.

Ack

[...]


> > +static int st_lsm6dsx_chan_init(struct iio_chan_spec *channels, struct
> > st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw,
> > +                               enum st_lsm6dsx_sensor_id id, int
> > index)
> 
> please try to respect the 79 column limit (I still like it :))

OK

> > +{
> > +       struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &channels[index];
> > +
> > +       chan->type = (id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) ? IIO_ACCEL :
> > IIO_ANGL_VEL;
> 
> I think you should return an error here if id is not ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC or
> ST_LSM6DSX_ID_GYRO.

Will do

> > +       chan->address = hw->settings->chan_addr_base[id] + index *
> > ST_LSM6DSX_CHAN_SIZE;
> > +       chan->modified = 1;
> > +       chan->channel2 = IIO_MOD_X + index;
> > +       chan->info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW);
> > +       chan->info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE);
> > +       chan->info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
> > +       chan->scan_index = index;
> > +       chan->scan_type.sign = 's';
> > +       chan->scan_type.realbits = 16;
> > +       chan->scan_type.storagebits = 16;
> > +       chan->scan_type.endianness = IIO_LE;
> 
> what about reducing the scope of
> ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL_ACC/ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL here
> to improve the iio_chan_spec struct initialization since most of the
> fields are
> always the same between different sensors.

Do you mean declaring a local struct variable initialized via
ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL() and then copying its contents to the dynamically
allocated struct? I'm not clear what benefits that would give us; in fact,
I think it would increase the code size (both in terms of LOC and compiled
binary size), besides the additional overhead of memory copying.

> 
> > +       chan->ext_info = st_lsm6dsx_ext_info;
> > +       if (id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
> > +               if (hw->settings->event_settings.wakeup_reg.addr) {
> 
>         if (id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC &&
>             hw->settings->event_settings.wakeup_reg.addr) {
>             ...
>         }
> 
> > +                       chan->event_spec = &st_lsm6dsx_event;
> > +                       chan->num_event_specs = 1;
> > +               }
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct iio_dev *st_lsm6dsx_alloc_iiodev(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw
> > *hw,
> >                                                enum
> > st_lsm6dsx_sensor_id id,
> >                                                const char *name)
> >  {
> >         struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor;
> >         struct iio_dev *iio_dev;
> > +       struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> 
> nit: chan to be consistent
> 
> > +       int i;
> >  
> >         iio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(hw->dev, sizeof(*sensor));
> >         if (!iio_dev)
> >                 return NULL;
> >  
> > +       channels = devm_kzalloc(hw->dev, sizeof(*channels) *
> > ST_LSM6DSX_CHAN_COUNT, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> 79 column limit here. I guess you can use even devm_kcalloc() here.

Will do

> > +       if (!channels)
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > +               if (st_lsm6dsx_chan_init(channels, hw, id, i) < 0)
> > +                       return NULL;
> > +       }
> 
> new line here.
> 
> > +       channels[3].type = IIO_TIMESTAMP;
> > +       channels[3].channel = -1;
> > +       channels[3].scan_index = 3;
> > +       channels[3].scan_type.sign = 's';
> > +       channels[3].scan_type.realbits = 64;
> > +       channels[3].scan_type.storagebits = 64;
> >         iio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> >         iio_dev->available_scan_masks =
> > st_lsm6dsx_available_scan_masks;
> > -       iio_dev->channels = hw->settings->channels[id].chan;
> > -       iio_dev->num_channels = hw->settings->channels[id].len;
> > +       iio_dev->channels = channels;
> > +       iio_dev->num_channels = ST_LSM6DSX_CHAN_COUNT;
> >  
> >         sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> >         sensor->id = id;
> > -- 
> > 2.39.5
> > 


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-31  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-30  7:27 [PATCH 0/9] st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically initialize iio_chan_spec data Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  7:57   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:03     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 16:42   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-31  8:04     ` Francesco Lavra [this message]
2025-10-31  8:09       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-31  8:26     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-31  8:32       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-31 11:43         ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-02 11:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03  9:24     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-09 13:32       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event_settings more generic Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 16:44   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-31  8:08     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: move wakeup event enable mask to event_src Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  7:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically allocate iio_event_spec structs Francesco Lavra
2025-11-02 11:22   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: rework code to check for enabled events Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: remove event_threshold field from hw struct Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  8:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:10     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:49       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-02 11:29         ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-02 13:45           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03  9:34             ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-03  9:40               ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 14:53               ` David Lechner
2025-11-09 13:31                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event management functions generic Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  8:15   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:17     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:36       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-02 11:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add event configurability on a per axis basis Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30  8:24   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:23     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:56       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-17 19:23         ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-18 10:44           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-18 11:01             ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-20  9:05               ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 11:43                 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-20 13:59                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 18:31                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-21  9:14                       ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-21  9:31                         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-21 14:57                           ` Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:11                             ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30  7:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55cf525d734878369f936834cca60ce7972d268a.camel@baylibre.com \
    --to=flavra@baylibre.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox