From: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically initialize iio_chan_spec data
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 10:24:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87f68357d52fe6406bab42d5bfb41e4addd9d301.camel@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251102111648.73422267@jic23-huawei>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1939 bytes --]
On Sun, 2025-11-02 at 11:16 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:27:44 +0100
> Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> > Using the ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL_ACC() macro as a static initializer
> > for the iio_chan_spec struct arrays makes all sensors advertise
> > channel event capabilities regardless of whether they actually
> > support event generation. And if userspace tries to configure
> > accelerometer wakeup events on a sensor device that does not
> > support them (e.g. LSM6DS0), st_lsm6dsx_write_event() dereferences
> > a NULL pointer when trying to write to the wakeup register.
> > Replace usage of the ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL_ACC() and
> > ST_LSM6DSX_CHANNEL() macros with dynamic allocation and
> > initialization of struct iio_chan_spec arrays, where the
> > st_lsm6dsx_event structure is only used for sensors that support
> > wakeup events; besides fixing the above bug, this serves as a
> > preliminary step for adding support for more event types.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
>
> In cases where there are only a small number of options for what the
> channel
> arrays should contain, my normal preference would be more data over
> moving
> the complexity into code. That is have two struct iio_chan_spec arrays
> and
> pick between them based on availability of the interrupt.
>
> I haven't checked the whole series yet, but how many channel arrays
> would we need to support the features you are introducing here? That is
> how many different combinations exist in the supported chips?
In the current code there are 3 struct iio_chan_spec arrays; we would need
one more to fix the above bug, and one more to add tap event support; so a
total of 5 arrays (each of length 4).
As for struct iio_event_spec, the current code has one array (of length 1),
and to add tap event support we would need another array (of length 2).
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 7:27 [PATCH 0/9] st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically initialize iio_chan_spec data Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:03 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 16:42 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-31 8:04 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-31 8:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-31 8:26 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-31 8:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-31 11:43 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-02 11:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 9:24 ` Francesco Lavra [this message]
2025-11-09 13:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event_settings more generic Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 16:44 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-31 8:08 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: move wakeup event enable mask to event_src Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically allocate iio_event_spec structs Francesco Lavra
2025-11-02 11:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: rework code to check for enabled events Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: remove event_threshold field from hw struct Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 8:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:10 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-02 11:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-02 13:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 9:34 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-03 9:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 14:53 ` David Lechner
2025-11-09 13:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event management functions generic Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 8:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:17 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-02 11:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add event configurability on a per axis basis Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 8:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:23 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-17 19:23 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-18 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-18 11:01 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-20 9:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 11:43 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-20 13:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-21 9:14 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-21 9:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-21 14:57 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87f68357d52fe6406bab42d5bfb41e4addd9d301.camel@baylibre.com \
--to=flavra@baylibre.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox