From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
To: "Thomas Bächler" <thomas@archlinux.org>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:07:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404081407.29362.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5343D600.7000507@archlinux.org>
On Tuesday 08 April 2014, Thomas B=C3=A4chler wrote:
> Am 08.04.2014 12:25, schrieb Ruediger Meier:
> > Hm, isn't this a bit over the top? Adding a script just to
> > call "fstrim -a" automatically?
>
> It's a common task. I was getting tired of having to add this on
> every single machine that I set up.
=46or me it's very common task to do "rm -rf /tmp" after each reboot. I=20
have to setup this on every single machine. Should I go to coreutils,=20
the developers of rm to add a script which calls "rm -rf /tmp" on=20
reboot?
No, of course my distribution should give me that feature.
> > Should we also add scripts for "mount -a" or "fsck -a" or "swapon
> > -a"?
>
> And what purpose would that serve? Did you just take random commands
> and add '-a' to prove a point?
I wanted to point out that util-linux is a project to provide us tools=20
and not all the ways how and when to use them. systemd ustream is=20
mounting and fsck'ing our filesystems automatically. So they can also=20
fstrim if they find it useful.
> > And wouldn't we also need to add "example crontab" lines for
> > non-systemd systems! Sounds a bit ridiculous, right?
>
> You can add them if you feel like it. But this is not an "example"
> file, it is ready to be used.
An example crontab line is also ready to use. Your example timer is=20
(hopefully) not automatically enabled just because it is installed.
> > I think it's the distro's or admin's job to write and add the
> > scripts for filesystems maintenance etc.
>
> That's ridiculous. We finally, for the first time ever, have a
> unified way of creating service definitions that can be used
> unchanged in all relevant distributions (except Gentoo and Slackware,
> of course).
Beside the fact that before "unique service definitions" were invented=20
nobody would have thought that one would need such thing just to call a=20
single commandline one time per day.
> The main advantage of this unification is that they can =20
> be shipped and maintained by upstream projects - after all, the
> upstream projects know what services make sense and how to start them
> properly.
I don't say something against systemd here and I don't see this black=20
and white only. I'am just against adding sysadmin scripts which=20
actually do only trivial things. Though it might be worth to add such=20
unit file if it does something more interesting, like we have already=20
uuidd.service and uuidd.socket (and uuidd.rc) which provides nices ways=20
how to start uuidd.
> > BTW fstrim.timer is missing in "make dist" tar ball.
>
> Sorry, you are right. I'm a bit lost in this build system, Karel
> probably knows how to fix this.
cu,
Rudi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-08 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 21:41 [PATCH] fstrim: add systemd units Thomas Bächler
2014-04-07 10:43 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 10:25 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 10:57 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-08 12:07 ` Ruediger Meier [this message]
2014-04-08 15:42 ` Dave Reisner
2014-04-08 17:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 7:52 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 10:07 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 11:02 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-09 12:12 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 12:49 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:24 ` Thomas Bächler
2014-04-09 15:44 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 14:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 15:48 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-09 15:55 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-04-09 18:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-10 8:05 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 9:17 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 12:49 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-10 13:16 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-10 13:22 ` Ruediger Meier
2014-04-08 17:26 ` Karel Zak
2014-04-08 17:30 ` Thomas Bächler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201404081407.29362.sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--to=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@archlinux.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox